Cargando…

Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)

A field study undertaken in Australia compared the antibody responses induced in client-owned cats that had been vaccinated using two inactivated whole feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) vaccines, the monovalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and the polyvalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) 5. Serum samples from 428 F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westman, Mark, Norris, Jacqueline, Malik, Richard, Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina, Parr, Yasmin A., Armstrong, Emma, McDonald, Mike, Hall, Evelyn, Sheehy, Paul, Hosie, Margaret J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13020240
_version_ 1783656845653573632
author Westman, Mark
Norris, Jacqueline
Malik, Richard
Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina
Parr, Yasmin A.
Armstrong, Emma
McDonald, Mike
Hall, Evelyn
Sheehy, Paul
Hosie, Margaret J.
author_facet Westman, Mark
Norris, Jacqueline
Malik, Richard
Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina
Parr, Yasmin A.
Armstrong, Emma
McDonald, Mike
Hall, Evelyn
Sheehy, Paul
Hosie, Margaret J.
author_sort Westman, Mark
collection PubMed
description A field study undertaken in Australia compared the antibody responses induced in client-owned cats that had been vaccinated using two inactivated whole feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) vaccines, the monovalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and the polyvalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) 5. Serum samples from 428 FeLV-uninfected cats (118 FeLV-vaccinated and 310 FeLV-unvaccinated) were tested for anti-FeLV neutralising antibodies (NAb) using a live virus neutralisation assay to identify 378 FeLV-unexposed (NAb-negative) and 50 FeLV-exposed (NAb-positive; abortive infections) cats, following by anti-surface unit (SU) FeLV-A and FeLV-B antibody ELISA testing. An additional 42 FeLV-infected cats (28 presumptively regressively infected, 14 presumptively progressively infected) were also tested for anti-SU antibodies. NAb-positive cats displayed significantly higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses compared to NAb-negative cats (p < 0.001). FeLV-unexposed cats (NAb-negative) that had been vaccinated less than 18 months after a previous FeLV vaccination using the monovalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K) displayed higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses than a comparable group vaccinated with the polyvalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) (p < 0.001 for both anti-FeLV-A and FeLV-B SU antibody responses). This difference in anti-SU antibody responses between cats vaccinated with the monovalent or polyvalent vaccine, however, was not observed in cats that had been naturally exposed to FeLV (NAb-positive) (p = 0.33). It was postulated that vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) 5 primed the humoral response prior to FeLV exposure, such that antibody production increased when the animal was challenged, while vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K induced an immediate preparatory antibody response that did not quantitatively increase after FeLV exposure. These results raise questions about the comparable vaccine efficacy of the different FeLV vaccine formulations and correlates of protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7913631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79136312021-02-28 Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) Westman, Mark Norris, Jacqueline Malik, Richard Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina Parr, Yasmin A. Armstrong, Emma McDonald, Mike Hall, Evelyn Sheehy, Paul Hosie, Margaret J. Viruses Article A field study undertaken in Australia compared the antibody responses induced in client-owned cats that had been vaccinated using two inactivated whole feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) vaccines, the monovalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and the polyvalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) 5. Serum samples from 428 FeLV-uninfected cats (118 FeLV-vaccinated and 310 FeLV-unvaccinated) were tested for anti-FeLV neutralising antibodies (NAb) using a live virus neutralisation assay to identify 378 FeLV-unexposed (NAb-negative) and 50 FeLV-exposed (NAb-positive; abortive infections) cats, following by anti-surface unit (SU) FeLV-A and FeLV-B antibody ELISA testing. An additional 42 FeLV-infected cats (28 presumptively regressively infected, 14 presumptively progressively infected) were also tested for anti-SU antibodies. NAb-positive cats displayed significantly higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses compared to NAb-negative cats (p < 0.001). FeLV-unexposed cats (NAb-negative) that had been vaccinated less than 18 months after a previous FeLV vaccination using the monovalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K) displayed higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses than a comparable group vaccinated with the polyvalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) (p < 0.001 for both anti-FeLV-A and FeLV-B SU antibody responses). This difference in anti-SU antibody responses between cats vaccinated with the monovalent or polyvalent vaccine, however, was not observed in cats that had been naturally exposed to FeLV (NAb-positive) (p = 0.33). It was postulated that vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) 5 primed the humoral response prior to FeLV exposure, such that antibody production increased when the animal was challenged, while vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K induced an immediate preparatory antibody response that did not quantitatively increase after FeLV exposure. These results raise questions about the comparable vaccine efficacy of the different FeLV vaccine formulations and correlates of protection. MDPI 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7913631/ /pubmed/33546485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13020240 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Westman, Mark
Norris, Jacqueline
Malik, Richard
Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina
Parr, Yasmin A.
Armstrong, Emma
McDonald, Mike
Hall, Evelyn
Sheehy, Paul
Hosie, Margaret J.
Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)
title Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)
title_full Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)
title_fullStr Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)
title_full_unstemmed Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)
title_short Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)
title_sort anti-su antibody responses in client-owned cats following vaccination against feline leukaemia virus with two inactivated whole-virus vaccines (fel-o-vax(®) lv-k and fel-o-vax(®) 5)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13020240
work_keys_str_mv AT westmanmark antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT norrisjacqueline antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT malikrichard antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT hofmannlehmannregina antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT parryasmina antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT armstrongemma antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT mcdonaldmike antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT hallevelyn antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT sheehypaul antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5
AT hosiemargaretj antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5