Cargando…
Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5)
A field study undertaken in Australia compared the antibody responses induced in client-owned cats that had been vaccinated using two inactivated whole feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) vaccines, the monovalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and the polyvalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) 5. Serum samples from 428 F...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13020240 |
_version_ | 1783656845653573632 |
---|---|
author | Westman, Mark Norris, Jacqueline Malik, Richard Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina Parr, Yasmin A. Armstrong, Emma McDonald, Mike Hall, Evelyn Sheehy, Paul Hosie, Margaret J. |
author_facet | Westman, Mark Norris, Jacqueline Malik, Richard Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina Parr, Yasmin A. Armstrong, Emma McDonald, Mike Hall, Evelyn Sheehy, Paul Hosie, Margaret J. |
author_sort | Westman, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | A field study undertaken in Australia compared the antibody responses induced in client-owned cats that had been vaccinated using two inactivated whole feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) vaccines, the monovalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and the polyvalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) 5. Serum samples from 428 FeLV-uninfected cats (118 FeLV-vaccinated and 310 FeLV-unvaccinated) were tested for anti-FeLV neutralising antibodies (NAb) using a live virus neutralisation assay to identify 378 FeLV-unexposed (NAb-negative) and 50 FeLV-exposed (NAb-positive; abortive infections) cats, following by anti-surface unit (SU) FeLV-A and FeLV-B antibody ELISA testing. An additional 42 FeLV-infected cats (28 presumptively regressively infected, 14 presumptively progressively infected) were also tested for anti-SU antibodies. NAb-positive cats displayed significantly higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses compared to NAb-negative cats (p < 0.001). FeLV-unexposed cats (NAb-negative) that had been vaccinated less than 18 months after a previous FeLV vaccination using the monovalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K) displayed higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses than a comparable group vaccinated with the polyvalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) (p < 0.001 for both anti-FeLV-A and FeLV-B SU antibody responses). This difference in anti-SU antibody responses between cats vaccinated with the monovalent or polyvalent vaccine, however, was not observed in cats that had been naturally exposed to FeLV (NAb-positive) (p = 0.33). It was postulated that vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) 5 primed the humoral response prior to FeLV exposure, such that antibody production increased when the animal was challenged, while vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K induced an immediate preparatory antibody response that did not quantitatively increase after FeLV exposure. These results raise questions about the comparable vaccine efficacy of the different FeLV vaccine formulations and correlates of protection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7913631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79136312021-02-28 Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) Westman, Mark Norris, Jacqueline Malik, Richard Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina Parr, Yasmin A. Armstrong, Emma McDonald, Mike Hall, Evelyn Sheehy, Paul Hosie, Margaret J. Viruses Article A field study undertaken in Australia compared the antibody responses induced in client-owned cats that had been vaccinated using two inactivated whole feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) vaccines, the monovalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and the polyvalent vaccine Fel-O-Vax(®) 5. Serum samples from 428 FeLV-uninfected cats (118 FeLV-vaccinated and 310 FeLV-unvaccinated) were tested for anti-FeLV neutralising antibodies (NAb) using a live virus neutralisation assay to identify 378 FeLV-unexposed (NAb-negative) and 50 FeLV-exposed (NAb-positive; abortive infections) cats, following by anti-surface unit (SU) FeLV-A and FeLV-B antibody ELISA testing. An additional 42 FeLV-infected cats (28 presumptively regressively infected, 14 presumptively progressively infected) were also tested for anti-SU antibodies. NAb-positive cats displayed significantly higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses compared to NAb-negative cats (p < 0.001). FeLV-unexposed cats (NAb-negative) that had been vaccinated less than 18 months after a previous FeLV vaccination using the monovalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K) displayed higher anti-SU antibody ELISA responses than a comparable group vaccinated with the polyvalent vaccine (Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) (p < 0.001 for both anti-FeLV-A and FeLV-B SU antibody responses). This difference in anti-SU antibody responses between cats vaccinated with the monovalent or polyvalent vaccine, however, was not observed in cats that had been naturally exposed to FeLV (NAb-positive) (p = 0.33). It was postulated that vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) 5 primed the humoral response prior to FeLV exposure, such that antibody production increased when the animal was challenged, while vaccination with Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K induced an immediate preparatory antibody response that did not quantitatively increase after FeLV exposure. These results raise questions about the comparable vaccine efficacy of the different FeLV vaccine formulations and correlates of protection. MDPI 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7913631/ /pubmed/33546485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13020240 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Westman, Mark Norris, Jacqueline Malik, Richard Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina Parr, Yasmin A. Armstrong, Emma McDonald, Mike Hall, Evelyn Sheehy, Paul Hosie, Margaret J. Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) |
title | Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) |
title_full | Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) |
title_fullStr | Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) |
title_full_unstemmed | Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) |
title_short | Anti-SU Antibody Responses in Client-Owned Cats Following Vaccination against Feline Leukaemia Virus with Two Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccines (Fel-O-Vax(®) Lv-K and Fel-O-Vax(®) 5) |
title_sort | anti-su antibody responses in client-owned cats following vaccination against feline leukaemia virus with two inactivated whole-virus vaccines (fel-o-vax(®) lv-k and fel-o-vax(®) 5) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v13020240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT westmanmark antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT norrisjacqueline antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT malikrichard antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT hofmannlehmannregina antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT parryasmina antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT armstrongemma antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT mcdonaldmike antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT hallevelyn antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT sheehypaul antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 AT hosiemargaretj antisuantibodyresponsesinclientownedcatsfollowingvaccinationagainstfelineleukaemiaviruswithtwoinactivatedwholevirusvaccinesfelovaxlvkandfelovax5 |