Cargando…

Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations

Systemic fungal infections are associated with high mortality rates despite adequate treatment. Moreover, acquired resistance to antifungals is increasing, which further complicates the therapeutic management. One strategy to overcome antifungal resistance is to use antifungal combinations. In vitro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bidaud, Anne-Laure, Schwarz, Patrick, Herbreteau, Guillaume, Dannaoui, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof7020113
_version_ 1783656850147770368
author Bidaud, Anne-Laure
Schwarz, Patrick
Herbreteau, Guillaume
Dannaoui, Eric
author_facet Bidaud, Anne-Laure
Schwarz, Patrick
Herbreteau, Guillaume
Dannaoui, Eric
author_sort Bidaud, Anne-Laure
collection PubMed
description Systemic fungal infections are associated with high mortality rates despite adequate treatment. Moreover, acquired resistance to antifungals is increasing, which further complicates the therapeutic management. One strategy to overcome antifungal resistance is to use antifungal combinations. In vitro, several techniques are used to assess drug interactions, such as the broth microdilution checkerboard, agar-diffusion methods, and time-kill curves. Currently, the most widely used technique is the checkerboard method. The aim of all these techniques is to determine if the interaction between antifungal agents is synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. However, the interpretation of the results remains difficult. Several methods of analysis can be used, based on different theories. The most commonly used method is the calculation of the fractional inhibitory concentration index. Determination of the usefulness of combination treatments in patients needs well-conducted clinical trials, which are difficult. It is therefore important to study antifungal combinations in vivo, in experimental animal models of fungal infections. Although mammalian models have mostly been used, new alternative animal models in invertebrates look promising. To evaluate the antifungal efficacy, the most commonly used criteria are the mortality rate and the fungal load in the target organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7913650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79136502021-02-28 Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations Bidaud, Anne-Laure Schwarz, Patrick Herbreteau, Guillaume Dannaoui, Eric J Fungi (Basel) Review Systemic fungal infections are associated with high mortality rates despite adequate treatment. Moreover, acquired resistance to antifungals is increasing, which further complicates the therapeutic management. One strategy to overcome antifungal resistance is to use antifungal combinations. In vitro, several techniques are used to assess drug interactions, such as the broth microdilution checkerboard, agar-diffusion methods, and time-kill curves. Currently, the most widely used technique is the checkerboard method. The aim of all these techniques is to determine if the interaction between antifungal agents is synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. However, the interpretation of the results remains difficult. Several methods of analysis can be used, based on different theories. The most commonly used method is the calculation of the fractional inhibitory concentration index. Determination of the usefulness of combination treatments in patients needs well-conducted clinical trials, which are difficult. It is therefore important to study antifungal combinations in vivo, in experimental animal models of fungal infections. Although mammalian models have mostly been used, new alternative animal models in invertebrates look promising. To evaluate the antifungal efficacy, the most commonly used criteria are the mortality rate and the fungal load in the target organs. MDPI 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7913650/ /pubmed/33557026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof7020113 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bidaud, Anne-Laure
Schwarz, Patrick
Herbreteau, Guillaume
Dannaoui, Eric
Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations
title Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations
title_full Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations
title_fullStr Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations
title_full_unstemmed Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations
title_short Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations
title_sort techniques for the assessment of in vitro and in vivo antifungal combinations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof7020113
work_keys_str_mv AT bidaudannelaure techniquesfortheassessmentofinvitroandinvivoantifungalcombinations
AT schwarzpatrick techniquesfortheassessmentofinvitroandinvivoantifungalcombinations
AT herbreteauguillaume techniquesfortheassessmentofinvitroandinvivoantifungalcombinations
AT dannaouieric techniquesfortheassessmentofinvitroandinvivoantifungalcombinations