Cargando…

Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Bacteria deploy multiple defenses to prevent mobile genetic element (MGEs) invasion. CRISPR–Cas immune systems use RNA-guided nucleases to target MGEs, which counter with anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Our understanding of the biology and co-evolutionary dynamics of the common Type I-C CRISPR–Cas subty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: León, Lina M, Park, Allyson E, Borges, Adair L, Zhang, Jenny Y, Bondy-Denomy, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab006
_version_ 1783656880368779264
author León, Lina M
Park, Allyson E
Borges, Adair L
Zhang, Jenny Y
Bondy-Denomy, Joseph
author_facet León, Lina M
Park, Allyson E
Borges, Adair L
Zhang, Jenny Y
Bondy-Denomy, Joseph
author_sort León, Lina M
collection PubMed
description Bacteria deploy multiple defenses to prevent mobile genetic element (MGEs) invasion. CRISPR–Cas immune systems use RNA-guided nucleases to target MGEs, which counter with anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Our understanding of the biology and co-evolutionary dynamics of the common Type I-C CRISPR–Cas subtype has lagged because it lacks an in vivo phage-host model system. Here, we show the anti-phage function of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type I-C CRISPR–Cas system encoded on a conjugative pKLC102 island, and its Acr-mediated inhibition by distinct MGEs. Seven genes with anti-Type I-C function (acrIC genes) were identified, many with highly acidic amino acid content, including previously described DNA mimic AcrIF2. Four of the acr genes were broad spectrum, also inhibiting I-E or I-F P. aeruginosa CRISPR–Cas subtypes. Dual inhibition comes at a cost, however, as simultaneous expression of Type I-C and I-F systems renders phages expressing the dual inhibitor AcrIF2 more sensitive to targeting. Mutagenesis of numerous acidic residues in AcrIF2 did not impair anti-I-C or anti-I-F function per se but did exacerbate inhibition defects during competition, suggesting that excess negative charge may buffer DNA mimics against competition. Like AcrIF2, five of the Acr proteins block Cascade from binding DNA, while two function downstream, likely preventing Cas3 recruitment or activity. One such inhibitor, AcrIC3, is found in an ‘anti-Cas3’ cluster within conjugative elements, encoded alongside bona fide Cas3 inhibitors AcrIF3 and AcrIE1. Our findings demonstrate an active battle between an MGE-encoded CRISPR–Cas system and its diverse MGE targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7913775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79137752021-03-03 Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa León, Lina M Park, Allyson E Borges, Adair L Zhang, Jenny Y Bondy-Denomy, Joseph Nucleic Acids Res Molecular Biology Bacteria deploy multiple defenses to prevent mobile genetic element (MGEs) invasion. CRISPR–Cas immune systems use RNA-guided nucleases to target MGEs, which counter with anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Our understanding of the biology and co-evolutionary dynamics of the common Type I-C CRISPR–Cas subtype has lagged because it lacks an in vivo phage-host model system. Here, we show the anti-phage function of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type I-C CRISPR–Cas system encoded on a conjugative pKLC102 island, and its Acr-mediated inhibition by distinct MGEs. Seven genes with anti-Type I-C function (acrIC genes) were identified, many with highly acidic amino acid content, including previously described DNA mimic AcrIF2. Four of the acr genes were broad spectrum, also inhibiting I-E or I-F P. aeruginosa CRISPR–Cas subtypes. Dual inhibition comes at a cost, however, as simultaneous expression of Type I-C and I-F systems renders phages expressing the dual inhibitor AcrIF2 more sensitive to targeting. Mutagenesis of numerous acidic residues in AcrIF2 did not impair anti-I-C or anti-I-F function per se but did exacerbate inhibition defects during competition, suggesting that excess negative charge may buffer DNA mimics against competition. Like AcrIF2, five of the Acr proteins block Cascade from binding DNA, while two function downstream, likely preventing Cas3 recruitment or activity. One such inhibitor, AcrIC3, is found in an ‘anti-Cas3’ cluster within conjugative elements, encoded alongside bona fide Cas3 inhibitors AcrIF3 and AcrIE1. Our findings demonstrate an active battle between an MGE-encoded CRISPR–Cas system and its diverse MGE targets. Oxford University Press 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7913775/ /pubmed/33544853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab006 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Molecular Biology
León, Lina M
Park, Allyson E
Borges, Adair L
Zhang, Jenny Y
Bondy-Denomy, Joseph
Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_fullStr Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full_unstemmed Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_short Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_sort mobile element warfare via crispr and anti-crispr in pseudomonas aeruginosa
topic Molecular Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7913775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab006
work_keys_str_mv AT leonlinam mobileelementwarfareviacrisprandanticrisprinpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT parkallysone mobileelementwarfareviacrisprandanticrisprinpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT borgesadairl mobileelementwarfareviacrisprandanticrisprinpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT zhangjennyy mobileelementwarfareviacrisprandanticrisprinpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT bondydenomyjoseph mobileelementwarfareviacrisprandanticrisprinpseudomonasaeruginosa