Cargando…
Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6 |
_version_ | 1783656972515540992 |
---|---|
author | Lorscheider, Johannes Benkert, Pascal Lienert, Carmen Hänni, Peter Derfuss, Tobias Kuhle, Jens Kappos, Ludwig Yaldizli, Özgür |
author_facet | Lorscheider, Johannes Benkert, Pascal Lienert, Carmen Hänni, Peter Derfuss, Tobias Kuhle, Jens Kappos, Ludwig Yaldizli, Özgür |
author_sort | Lorscheider, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting, where both agents are licensed as a first-line DMT for the treatment of RRMS. METHODS: We identified patients with RRMS commencing dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod in the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances (SVK) Registry between August 2014 and July 2019. Propensity score-matching was applied to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapses and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses. RESULTS: Of the 2113 included patients, 1922 were matched (dimethyl fumarate, n = 961; fingolimod, n = 961). Relapse rates did not differ between the groups (incident rate ratio 1.0, 95%CI 0.8–1.2, p = 0.86). Moreover, no difference in the hazard of 1-year confirmed disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR] 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.6; p = 0.80) or disability improvement (HR 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.2; p = 0.40) was detected. These findings were consistent both for treatment-naïve patients and patients switching from another DMT. CONCLUSION: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable effectiveness regarding reduction of relapses and disability worsening in RRMS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7914245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79142452021-03-15 Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis Lorscheider, Johannes Benkert, Pascal Lienert, Carmen Hänni, Peter Derfuss, Tobias Kuhle, Jens Kappos, Ludwig Yaldizli, Özgür J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting, where both agents are licensed as a first-line DMT for the treatment of RRMS. METHODS: We identified patients with RRMS commencing dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod in the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances (SVK) Registry between August 2014 and July 2019. Propensity score-matching was applied to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapses and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses. RESULTS: Of the 2113 included patients, 1922 were matched (dimethyl fumarate, n = 961; fingolimod, n = 961). Relapse rates did not differ between the groups (incident rate ratio 1.0, 95%CI 0.8–1.2, p = 0.86). Moreover, no difference in the hazard of 1-year confirmed disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR] 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.6; p = 0.80) or disability improvement (HR 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.2; p = 0.40) was detected. These findings were consistent both for treatment-naïve patients and patients switching from another DMT. CONCLUSION: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable effectiveness regarding reduction of relapses and disability worsening in RRMS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7914245/ /pubmed/32974794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Communication Lorscheider, Johannes Benkert, Pascal Lienert, Carmen Hänni, Peter Derfuss, Tobias Kuhle, Jens Kappos, Ludwig Yaldizli, Özgür Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis |
title | Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_full | Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_short | Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis |
title_sort | comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorscheiderjohannes comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT benkertpascal comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT lienertcarmen comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT hannipeter comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT derfusstobias comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT kuhlejens comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT kapposludwig comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis AT yaldizliozgur comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis |