Cargando…

Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorscheider, Johannes, Benkert, Pascal, Lienert, Carmen, Hänni, Peter, Derfuss, Tobias, Kuhle, Jens, Kappos, Ludwig, Yaldizli, Özgür
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6
_version_ 1783656972515540992
author Lorscheider, Johannes
Benkert, Pascal
Lienert, Carmen
Hänni, Peter
Derfuss, Tobias
Kuhle, Jens
Kappos, Ludwig
Yaldizli, Özgür
author_facet Lorscheider, Johannes
Benkert, Pascal
Lienert, Carmen
Hänni, Peter
Derfuss, Tobias
Kuhle, Jens
Kappos, Ludwig
Yaldizli, Özgür
author_sort Lorscheider, Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting, where both agents are licensed as a first-line DMT for the treatment of RRMS. METHODS: We identified patients with RRMS commencing dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod in the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances (SVK) Registry between August 2014 and July 2019. Propensity score-matching was applied to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapses and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses. RESULTS: Of the 2113 included patients, 1922 were matched (dimethyl fumarate, n = 961; fingolimod, n = 961). Relapse rates did not differ between the groups (incident rate ratio 1.0, 95%CI 0.8–1.2, p = 0.86). Moreover, no difference in the hazard of 1-year confirmed disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR] 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.6; p = 0.80) or disability improvement (HR 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.2; p = 0.40) was detected. These findings were consistent both for treatment-naïve patients and patients switching from another DMT. CONCLUSION: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable effectiveness regarding reduction of relapses and disability worsening in RRMS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7914245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79142452021-03-15 Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis Lorscheider, Johannes Benkert, Pascal Lienert, Carmen Hänni, Peter Derfuss, Tobias Kuhle, Jens Kappos, Ludwig Yaldizli, Özgür J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting, where both agents are licensed as a first-line DMT for the treatment of RRMS. METHODS: We identified patients with RRMS commencing dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod in the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances (SVK) Registry between August 2014 and July 2019. Propensity score-matching was applied to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapses and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses. RESULTS: Of the 2113 included patients, 1922 were matched (dimethyl fumarate, n = 961; fingolimod, n = 961). Relapse rates did not differ between the groups (incident rate ratio 1.0, 95%CI 0.8–1.2, p = 0.86). Moreover, no difference in the hazard of 1-year confirmed disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR] 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.6; p = 0.80) or disability improvement (HR 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.2; p = 0.40) was detected. These findings were consistent both for treatment-naïve patients and patients switching from another DMT. CONCLUSION: Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable effectiveness regarding reduction of relapses and disability worsening in RRMS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7914245/ /pubmed/32974794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Communication
Lorscheider, Johannes
Benkert, Pascal
Lienert, Carmen
Hänni, Peter
Derfuss, Tobias
Kuhle, Jens
Kappos, Ludwig
Yaldizli, Özgür
Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
title Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
title_full Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
title_short Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
title_sort comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lorscheiderjohannes comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis
AT benkertpascal comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis
AT lienertcarmen comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis
AT hannipeter comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis
AT derfusstobias comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis
AT kuhlejens comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis
AT kapposludwig comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis
AT yaldizliozgur comparativeanalysisofdimethylfumarateandfingolimodinrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosis