Cargando…

A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them

The ultimate goal of gene expression regulation is on the protein level. However, because the amounts of mRNAs and proteins are controlled by their synthesis and degradation rates, the cellular amount of a given protein can be attained by following different strategies. By studying omics data for si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forés-Martos, Jaume, Forte, Anabel, García-Martínez, José, Pérez-Ortín, José E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33562654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020334
_version_ 1783657040157081600
author Forés-Martos, Jaume
Forte, Anabel
García-Martínez, José
Pérez-Ortín, José E.
author_facet Forés-Martos, Jaume
Forte, Anabel
García-Martínez, José
Pérez-Ortín, José E.
author_sort Forés-Martos, Jaume
collection PubMed
description The ultimate goal of gene expression regulation is on the protein level. However, because the amounts of mRNAs and proteins are controlled by their synthesis and degradation rates, the cellular amount of a given protein can be attained by following different strategies. By studying omics data for six expression variables (mRNA and protein amounts, plus their synthesis and decay rates), we previously demonstrated the existence of common expression strategies (CESs) for functionally related genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we extend that study to two other eukaryotes: the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and cultured human HeLa cells. We also use genomic data from the model prokaryote Escherichia coli as an external reference. We show that six-variable profiles (6VPs) can be constructed for every gene and that these 6VPs are similar for genes with similar functions in all the studied organisms. The differences in 6VPs between organisms can be used to establish their phylogenetic relationships. The analysis of the correlations among the six variables supports the hypothesis that most gene expression control occurs in actively growing organisms at the transcription rate level, and that translation plays a minor role. We propose that living organisms use CESs for the genes acting on the same physiological pathways, especially for those belonging to stable macromolecular complexes, but CESs have been modeled by evolution to adapt to the specific life circumstances of each organism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7914595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79145952021-03-01 A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them Forés-Martos, Jaume Forte, Anabel García-Martínez, José Pérez-Ortín, José E. Cells Article The ultimate goal of gene expression regulation is on the protein level. However, because the amounts of mRNAs and proteins are controlled by their synthesis and degradation rates, the cellular amount of a given protein can be attained by following different strategies. By studying omics data for six expression variables (mRNA and protein amounts, plus their synthesis and decay rates), we previously demonstrated the existence of common expression strategies (CESs) for functionally related genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we extend that study to two other eukaryotes: the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and cultured human HeLa cells. We also use genomic data from the model prokaryote Escherichia coli as an external reference. We show that six-variable profiles (6VPs) can be constructed for every gene and that these 6VPs are similar for genes with similar functions in all the studied organisms. The differences in 6VPs between organisms can be used to establish their phylogenetic relationships. The analysis of the correlations among the six variables supports the hypothesis that most gene expression control occurs in actively growing organisms at the transcription rate level, and that translation plays a minor role. We propose that living organisms use CESs for the genes acting on the same physiological pathways, especially for those belonging to stable macromolecular complexes, but CESs have been modeled by evolution to adapt to the specific life circumstances of each organism. MDPI 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7914595/ /pubmed/33562654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020334 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Forés-Martos, Jaume
Forte, Anabel
García-Martínez, José
Pérez-Ortín, José E.
A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them
title A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them
title_full A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them
title_fullStr A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them
title_full_unstemmed A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them
title_short A Trans-Omics Comparison Reveals Common Gene Expression Strategies in Four Model Organisms and Exposes Similarities and Differences between Them
title_sort trans-omics comparison reveals common gene expression strategies in four model organisms and exposes similarities and differences between them
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33562654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10020334
work_keys_str_mv AT foresmartosjaume atransomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem
AT forteanabel atransomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem
AT garciamartinezjose atransomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem
AT perezortinjosee atransomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem
AT foresmartosjaume transomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem
AT forteanabel transomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem
AT garciamartinezjose transomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem
AT perezortinjosee transomicscomparisonrevealscommongeneexpressionstrategiesinfourmodelorganismsandexposessimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthem