Cargando…

Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model

Bioengineered artificial skin substitutes (BASS) are the main treatment used in addition to autografts when skin injuries involve a large body surface area. Antiseptic/antibiotic treatment is necessary to prevent infections in the BASS implant area. This study aims to evaluate the effect of antisept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quiñones-Vico, María I., Fernández-González, Ana, Pérez-Castejón, Elena, Montero-Vílchez, Trinidad, Arias-Santiago, Salvador
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040642
_version_ 1783657044156350464
author Quiñones-Vico, María I.
Fernández-González, Ana
Pérez-Castejón, Elena
Montero-Vílchez, Trinidad
Arias-Santiago, Salvador
author_facet Quiñones-Vico, María I.
Fernández-González, Ana
Pérez-Castejón, Elena
Montero-Vílchez, Trinidad
Arias-Santiago, Salvador
author_sort Quiñones-Vico, María I.
collection PubMed
description Bioengineered artificial skin substitutes (BASS) are the main treatment used in addition to autografts when skin injuries involve a large body surface area. Antiseptic/antibiotic treatment is necessary to prevent infections in the BASS implant area. This study aims to evaluate the effect of antiseptics and antibiotics on cell viability, structural integrity, and epidermal barrier function in BASS based on hyaluronic acid during a 28 day follow-up period. Keratinocytes (KTs) and dermal fibroblasts (DFs) were isolated from skin samples and used to establish BASS. The following antibiotic/antiseptic treatment was applied every 48 h: colistin (1%), chlorhexidine digluconate (1%), sodium chloride (0.02%), and polyhexanide (0.1%). Cell viability (LIVE/DEAD(®) assay), structural integrity (histological evaluation), and epidermal barrier function (trans-epidermal water loss, (TEWL), Tewameter(®)) were also evaluated. Cell viability percentage of BASS treated with chlorhexidine digluconate was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.001) than the other antiseptics at day 28. Compared to other treatments, chlorhexidine digluconate and polyhexanide significantly affected the epithelium. No significant differences were found regarding epidermal barrier. These results may be useful for treatment protocols after implantation of BASS in patients and evaluating them in clinical practice. BASS represent a suitable model to test in vitro the impact of different treatments of other skin wounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7914612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79146122021-03-01 Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model Quiñones-Vico, María I. Fernández-González, Ana Pérez-Castejón, Elena Montero-Vílchez, Trinidad Arias-Santiago, Salvador J Clin Med Article Bioengineered artificial skin substitutes (BASS) are the main treatment used in addition to autografts when skin injuries involve a large body surface area. Antiseptic/antibiotic treatment is necessary to prevent infections in the BASS implant area. This study aims to evaluate the effect of antiseptics and antibiotics on cell viability, structural integrity, and epidermal barrier function in BASS based on hyaluronic acid during a 28 day follow-up period. Keratinocytes (KTs) and dermal fibroblasts (DFs) were isolated from skin samples and used to establish BASS. The following antibiotic/antiseptic treatment was applied every 48 h: colistin (1%), chlorhexidine digluconate (1%), sodium chloride (0.02%), and polyhexanide (0.1%). Cell viability (LIVE/DEAD(®) assay), structural integrity (histological evaluation), and epidermal barrier function (trans-epidermal water loss, (TEWL), Tewameter(®)) were also evaluated. Cell viability percentage of BASS treated with chlorhexidine digluconate was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.001) than the other antiseptics at day 28. Compared to other treatments, chlorhexidine digluconate and polyhexanide significantly affected the epithelium. No significant differences were found regarding epidermal barrier. These results may be useful for treatment protocols after implantation of BASS in patients and evaluating them in clinical practice. BASS represent a suitable model to test in vitro the impact of different treatments of other skin wounds. MDPI 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7914612/ /pubmed/33567522 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040642 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Quiñones-Vico, María I.
Fernández-González, Ana
Pérez-Castejón, Elena
Montero-Vílchez, Trinidad
Arias-Santiago, Salvador
Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model
title Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model
title_full Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model
title_fullStr Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model
title_full_unstemmed Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model
title_short Cytotoxicity and Epidermal Barrier Function Evaluation of Common Antiseptics for Clinical Use in an Artificial Autologous Skin Model
title_sort cytotoxicity and epidermal barrier function evaluation of common antiseptics for clinical use in an artificial autologous skin model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567522
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040642
work_keys_str_mv AT quinonesvicomariai cytotoxicityandepidermalbarrierfunctionevaluationofcommonantisepticsforclinicaluseinanartificialautologousskinmodel
AT fernandezgonzalezana cytotoxicityandepidermalbarrierfunctionevaluationofcommonantisepticsforclinicaluseinanartificialautologousskinmodel
AT perezcastejonelena cytotoxicityandepidermalbarrierfunctionevaluationofcommonantisepticsforclinicaluseinanartificialautologousskinmodel
AT monterovilcheztrinidad cytotoxicityandepidermalbarrierfunctionevaluationofcommonantisepticsforclinicaluseinanartificialautologousskinmodel
AT ariassantiagosalvador cytotoxicityandepidermalbarrierfunctionevaluationofcommonantisepticsforclinicaluseinanartificialautologousskinmodel