Cargando…

Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid

This paper aims to propose a temperature-dependent cohesive model to predict the delamination of dissimilar metal–composite material hybrid under Mode-I and Mode-II delamination. Commercial nonlinear finite element (FE) code LS-DYNA was used to simulate the material and cohesive model of hybrid alum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Zhen Pei, Ahmad, Zaini, Wong, King Jye, Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian, Petrů, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13040492
_version_ 1783657076343439360
author Chow, Zhen Pei
Ahmad, Zaini
Wong, King Jye
Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian
Petrů, Michal
author_facet Chow, Zhen Pei
Ahmad, Zaini
Wong, King Jye
Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian
Petrů, Michal
author_sort Chow, Zhen Pei
collection PubMed
description This paper aims to propose a temperature-dependent cohesive model to predict the delamination of dissimilar metal–composite material hybrid under Mode-I and Mode-II delamination. Commercial nonlinear finite element (FE) code LS-DYNA was used to simulate the material and cohesive model of hybrid aluminium–glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) laminate. For an accurate representation of the Mode-I and Mode-II delamination between aluminium and GFRP laminates, cohesive zone modelling with bilinear traction separation law was implemented. Cohesive zone properties at different temperatures were obtained by applying trends of experimental results from double cantilever beam and end notched flexural tests. Results from experimental tests were compared with simulation results at 30, 70 and 110 °C to verify the validity of the model. Mode-I and Mode-II FE models compared to experimental tests show a good correlation of 5.73% and 7.26% discrepancy, respectively. Crack front stress distribution at 30 °C is characterised by a smooth gradual decrease in Mode-I stress from the centre to the edge of the specimen. At 70 °C, the entire crack front reaches the maximum Mode-I stress with the exception of much lower stress build-up at the specimen’s edge. On the other hand, the Mode-II stress increases progressively from the centre to the edge at 30 °C. At 70 °C, uniform low stress is built up along the crack front with the exception of significantly higher stress concentrated only at the free edge. At 110 °C, the stress distribution for both modes transforms back to the similar profile, as observed in the 30 °C case.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7914749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79147492021-03-01 Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid Chow, Zhen Pei Ahmad, Zaini Wong, King Jye Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian Petrů, Michal Polymers (Basel) Article This paper aims to propose a temperature-dependent cohesive model to predict the delamination of dissimilar metal–composite material hybrid under Mode-I and Mode-II delamination. Commercial nonlinear finite element (FE) code LS-DYNA was used to simulate the material and cohesive model of hybrid aluminium–glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) laminate. For an accurate representation of the Mode-I and Mode-II delamination between aluminium and GFRP laminates, cohesive zone modelling with bilinear traction separation law was implemented. Cohesive zone properties at different temperatures were obtained by applying trends of experimental results from double cantilever beam and end notched flexural tests. Results from experimental tests were compared with simulation results at 30, 70 and 110 °C to verify the validity of the model. Mode-I and Mode-II FE models compared to experimental tests show a good correlation of 5.73% and 7.26% discrepancy, respectively. Crack front stress distribution at 30 °C is characterised by a smooth gradual decrease in Mode-I stress from the centre to the edge of the specimen. At 70 °C, the entire crack front reaches the maximum Mode-I stress with the exception of much lower stress build-up at the specimen’s edge. On the other hand, the Mode-II stress increases progressively from the centre to the edge at 30 °C. At 70 °C, uniform low stress is built up along the crack front with the exception of significantly higher stress concentrated only at the free edge. At 110 °C, the stress distribution for both modes transforms back to the similar profile, as observed in the 30 °C case. MDPI 2021-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7914749/ /pubmed/33557350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13040492 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chow, Zhen Pei
Ahmad, Zaini
Wong, King Jye
Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian
Petrů, Michal
Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid
title Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid
title_full Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid
title_fullStr Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid
title_full_unstemmed Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid
title_short Thermal Delamination Modelling and Evaluation of Aluminium–Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Hybrid
title_sort thermal delamination modelling and evaluation of aluminium–glass fibre-reinforced polymer hybrid
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13040492
work_keys_str_mv AT chowzhenpei thermaldelaminationmodellingandevaluationofaluminiumglassfibrereinforcedpolymerhybrid
AT ahmadzaini thermaldelaminationmodellingandevaluationofaluminiumglassfibrereinforcedpolymerhybrid
AT wongkingjye thermaldelaminationmodellingandevaluationofaluminiumglassfibrereinforcedpolymerhybrid
AT koloorseyedsaeidrahimian thermaldelaminationmodellingandevaluationofaluminiumglassfibrereinforcedpolymerhybrid
AT petrumichal thermaldelaminationmodellingandevaluationofaluminiumglassfibrereinforcedpolymerhybrid