Cargando…

Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings

The current study introduces a method for manufacturing steel–aluminum bearing bushings by compound forging. To study the process, cylindrical bimetal workpieces consisting of steel AISI 4820 (1.7147, 20MnCr5) in the internal diameter and aluminum 6082 (3.2315, AlSi1MgMn) in the external diameter we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behrens, Bernd-Arno, Uhe, Johanna, Petersen, Tom, Klose, Christian, Thürer, Susanne E., Diefenbach, Julian, Chugreeva, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040803
_version_ 1783657079859314688
author Behrens, Bernd-Arno
Uhe, Johanna
Petersen, Tom
Klose, Christian
Thürer, Susanne E.
Diefenbach, Julian
Chugreeva, Anna
author_facet Behrens, Bernd-Arno
Uhe, Johanna
Petersen, Tom
Klose, Christian
Thürer, Susanne E.
Diefenbach, Julian
Chugreeva, Anna
author_sort Behrens, Bernd-Arno
collection PubMed
description The current study introduces a method for manufacturing steel–aluminum bearing bushings by compound forging. To study the process, cylindrical bimetal workpieces consisting of steel AISI 4820 (1.7147, 20MnCr5) in the internal diameter and aluminum 6082 (3.2315, AlSi1MgMn) in the external diameter were used. The forming of compounds consisting of dissimilar materials is challenging due to their different thermophysical and mechanical properties. The specific heating concept discussed in this article was developed in order to achieve sufficient formability for both materials simultaneously. By means of tailored heating, the bimetal workpieces were successfully formed to a bearing bushing geometry using two different strategies with different heating durations. A metallurgical bond without any forging defects, e.g., gaps and cracks, was observed in areas of high deformation. The steel–aluminum interface was subsequently examined by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). It was found that the examined forming process, which utilized steel–aluminum workpieces having no metallurgical bond prior to forming, led to the formation of insular intermetallic phases along the joining zone with a maximum thickness of approximately 5–7 µm. The results of the EDS analysis indicated a prevailing Fe(x)Al(y) phase in the resulting intermetallic layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7914764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79147642021-03-01 Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings Behrens, Bernd-Arno Uhe, Johanna Petersen, Tom Klose, Christian Thürer, Susanne E. Diefenbach, Julian Chugreeva, Anna Materials (Basel) Article The current study introduces a method for manufacturing steel–aluminum bearing bushings by compound forging. To study the process, cylindrical bimetal workpieces consisting of steel AISI 4820 (1.7147, 20MnCr5) in the internal diameter and aluminum 6082 (3.2315, AlSi1MgMn) in the external diameter were used. The forming of compounds consisting of dissimilar materials is challenging due to their different thermophysical and mechanical properties. The specific heating concept discussed in this article was developed in order to achieve sufficient formability for both materials simultaneously. By means of tailored heating, the bimetal workpieces were successfully formed to a bearing bushing geometry using two different strategies with different heating durations. A metallurgical bond without any forging defects, e.g., gaps and cracks, was observed in areas of high deformation. The steel–aluminum interface was subsequently examined by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). It was found that the examined forming process, which utilized steel–aluminum workpieces having no metallurgical bond prior to forming, led to the formation of insular intermetallic phases along the joining zone with a maximum thickness of approximately 5–7 µm. The results of the EDS analysis indicated a prevailing Fe(x)Al(y) phase in the resulting intermetallic layer. MDPI 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7914764/ /pubmed/33567646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040803 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Behrens, Bernd-Arno
Uhe, Johanna
Petersen, Tom
Klose, Christian
Thürer, Susanne E.
Diefenbach, Julian
Chugreeva, Anna
Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings
title Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings
title_full Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings
title_fullStr Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings
title_short Challenges in the Forging of Steel-Aluminum Bearing Bushings
title_sort challenges in the forging of steel-aluminum bearing bushings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040803
work_keys_str_mv AT behrensberndarno challengesintheforgingofsteelaluminumbearingbushings
AT uhejohanna challengesintheforgingofsteelaluminumbearingbushings
AT petersentom challengesintheforgingofsteelaluminumbearingbushings
AT klosechristian challengesintheforgingofsteelaluminumbearingbushings
AT thurersusannee challengesintheforgingofsteelaluminumbearingbushings
AT diefenbachjulian challengesintheforgingofsteelaluminumbearingbushings
AT chugreevaanna challengesintheforgingofsteelaluminumbearingbushings