Cargando…

Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications

Ceftobiprole combines an excellent spectrum for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) pathogens, with a low/medium MDR risk, and the β-lactams’ safety in frail patients admitted to the hospital in internal medicine wards which may be at high risk of adverse events...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lupia, Tommaso, Pallotto, Carlo, Corcione, Silvia, Boglione, Lucio, De Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020170
_version_ 1783657272546689024
author Lupia, Tommaso
Pallotto, Carlo
Corcione, Silvia
Boglione, Lucio
De Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe
author_facet Lupia, Tommaso
Pallotto, Carlo
Corcione, Silvia
Boglione, Lucio
De Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe
author_sort Lupia, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Ceftobiprole combines an excellent spectrum for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) pathogens, with a low/medium MDR risk, and the β-lactams’ safety in frail patients admitted to the hospital in internal medicine wards which may be at high risk of adverse events by anti-MRSA coverage as oxazolidinones or glycopeptides. We aimed to report the available evidence regarding ceftobiprole use in pneumonia and invasive bacterial infections, shedding light on ceftobiprole stewardship. The clinical application and real-life experiences of using ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, including infective endocarditis, are limited but nevertheless promising. In addition, extended-spectrum ceftobiprole activity, including Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, has theoretical advantages for use as empirical therapy in bacteremia potentially caused by a broad spectrum of microorganisms, such as catheter-related bacteremia. In the future, the desirable approach to sepsis and severe infections will be administered to patients according to their clinical situation, the intrinsic host characteristics, the susceptibility profile, and local epidemiology, while the “universal antibiotic strategy” will no longer be adequate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7915564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79155642021-03-01 Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications Lupia, Tommaso Pallotto, Carlo Corcione, Silvia Boglione, Lucio De Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe Antibiotics (Basel) Review Ceftobiprole combines an excellent spectrum for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) pathogens, with a low/medium MDR risk, and the β-lactams’ safety in frail patients admitted to the hospital in internal medicine wards which may be at high risk of adverse events by anti-MRSA coverage as oxazolidinones or glycopeptides. We aimed to report the available evidence regarding ceftobiprole use in pneumonia and invasive bacterial infections, shedding light on ceftobiprole stewardship. The clinical application and real-life experiences of using ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, including infective endocarditis, are limited but nevertheless promising. In addition, extended-spectrum ceftobiprole activity, including Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, has theoretical advantages for use as empirical therapy in bacteremia potentially caused by a broad spectrum of microorganisms, such as catheter-related bacteremia. In the future, the desirable approach to sepsis and severe infections will be administered to patients according to their clinical situation, the intrinsic host characteristics, the susceptibility profile, and local epidemiology, while the “universal antibiotic strategy” will no longer be adequate. MDPI 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7915564/ /pubmed/33567771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020170 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Lupia, Tommaso
Pallotto, Carlo
Corcione, Silvia
Boglione, Lucio
De Rosa, Francesco Giuseppe
Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications
title Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications
title_full Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications
title_fullStr Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications
title_full_unstemmed Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications
title_short Ceftobiprole Perspective: Current and Potential Future Indications
title_sort ceftobiprole perspective: current and potential future indications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33567771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10020170
work_keys_str_mv AT lupiatommaso ceftobiproleperspectivecurrentandpotentialfutureindications
AT pallottocarlo ceftobiproleperspectivecurrentandpotentialfutureindications
AT corcionesilvia ceftobiproleperspectivecurrentandpotentialfutureindications
AT boglionelucio ceftobiproleperspectivecurrentandpotentialfutureindications
AT derosafrancescogiuseppe ceftobiproleperspectivecurrentandpotentialfutureindications