Cargando…

Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data

In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Eduardo, Bertini, Luciano, Campos, Wagner Rangel, Sobral, Ana Paula, Mocaiber, Izabela, Copetti, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041214
_version_ 1783657285465145344
author Gomes, Eduardo
Bertini, Luciano
Campos, Wagner Rangel
Sobral, Ana Paula
Mocaiber, Izabela
Copetti, Alessandro
author_facet Gomes, Eduardo
Bertini, Luciano
Campos, Wagner Rangel
Sobral, Ana Paula
Mocaiber, Izabela
Copetti, Alessandro
author_sort Gomes, Eduardo
collection PubMed
description In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigated the potential advantage of coupling activity and intensity, namely, Activity-Intensity, in accelerometer data to improve the description of daily activities of individuals. We further tested two alternatives for supervised classification. In the first alternative, the activity and intensity are inferred together by applying a single classifier algorithm. In the other alternative, the activity and intensity are classified separately. In both cases, the algorithms used for classification are k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF). The results showed the viability of the classification with good accuracy for Activity-Intensity recognition. The best approach was KNN implemented in the single classifier alternative, which resulted in 79% of accuracy. Using two classifiers, the result was 97% accuracy for activity recognition (Random Forest), and 80% for intensity recognition (KNN), which resulted in 78% for activity-intensity coupled. These findings have potential applications to improve the contextualized evaluation of movement by health professionals in the form of a decision system with expert rules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7915619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79156192021-03-01 Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data Gomes, Eduardo Bertini, Luciano Campos, Wagner Rangel Sobral, Ana Paula Mocaiber, Izabela Copetti, Alessandro Sensors (Basel) Article In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigated the potential advantage of coupling activity and intensity, namely, Activity-Intensity, in accelerometer data to improve the description of daily activities of individuals. We further tested two alternatives for supervised classification. In the first alternative, the activity and intensity are inferred together by applying a single classifier algorithm. In the other alternative, the activity and intensity are classified separately. In both cases, the algorithms used for classification are k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF). The results showed the viability of the classification with good accuracy for Activity-Intensity recognition. The best approach was KNN implemented in the single classifier alternative, which resulted in 79% of accuracy. Using two classifiers, the result was 97% accuracy for activity recognition (Random Forest), and 80% for intensity recognition (KNN), which resulted in 78% for activity-intensity coupled. These findings have potential applications to improve the contextualized evaluation of movement by health professionals in the form of a decision system with expert rules. MDPI 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7915619/ /pubmed/33572249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041214 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gomes, Eduardo
Bertini, Luciano
Campos, Wagner Rangel
Sobral, Ana Paula
Mocaiber, Izabela
Copetti, Alessandro
Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data
title Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data
title_full Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data
title_fullStr Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data
title_short Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data
title_sort machine learning algorithms for activity-intensity recognition using accelerometer data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041214
work_keys_str_mv AT gomeseduardo machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata
AT bertiniluciano machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata
AT camposwagnerrangel machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata
AT sobralanapaula machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata
AT mocaiberizabela machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata
AT copettialessandro machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata