Cargando…
Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data
In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041214 |
_version_ | 1783657285465145344 |
---|---|
author | Gomes, Eduardo Bertini, Luciano Campos, Wagner Rangel Sobral, Ana Paula Mocaiber, Izabela Copetti, Alessandro |
author_facet | Gomes, Eduardo Bertini, Luciano Campos, Wagner Rangel Sobral, Ana Paula Mocaiber, Izabela Copetti, Alessandro |
author_sort | Gomes, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigated the potential advantage of coupling activity and intensity, namely, Activity-Intensity, in accelerometer data to improve the description of daily activities of individuals. We further tested two alternatives for supervised classification. In the first alternative, the activity and intensity are inferred together by applying a single classifier algorithm. In the other alternative, the activity and intensity are classified separately. In both cases, the algorithms used for classification are k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF). The results showed the viability of the classification with good accuracy for Activity-Intensity recognition. The best approach was KNN implemented in the single classifier alternative, which resulted in 79% of accuracy. Using two classifiers, the result was 97% accuracy for activity recognition (Random Forest), and 80% for intensity recognition (KNN), which resulted in 78% for activity-intensity coupled. These findings have potential applications to improve the contextualized evaluation of movement by health professionals in the form of a decision system with expert rules. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7915619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79156192021-03-01 Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data Gomes, Eduardo Bertini, Luciano Campos, Wagner Rangel Sobral, Ana Paula Mocaiber, Izabela Copetti, Alessandro Sensors (Basel) Article In pervasive healthcare monitoring, activity recognition is critical information for adequate management of the patient. Despite the great number of studies on this topic, a contextually relevant parameter that has received less attention is intensity recognition. In the present study, we investigated the potential advantage of coupling activity and intensity, namely, Activity-Intensity, in accelerometer data to improve the description of daily activities of individuals. We further tested two alternatives for supervised classification. In the first alternative, the activity and intensity are inferred together by applying a single classifier algorithm. In the other alternative, the activity and intensity are classified separately. In both cases, the algorithms used for classification are k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF). The results showed the viability of the classification with good accuracy for Activity-Intensity recognition. The best approach was KNN implemented in the single classifier alternative, which resulted in 79% of accuracy. Using two classifiers, the result was 97% accuracy for activity recognition (Random Forest), and 80% for intensity recognition (KNN), which resulted in 78% for activity-intensity coupled. These findings have potential applications to improve the contextualized evaluation of movement by health professionals in the form of a decision system with expert rules. MDPI 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7915619/ /pubmed/33572249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041214 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gomes, Eduardo Bertini, Luciano Campos, Wagner Rangel Sobral, Ana Paula Mocaiber, Izabela Copetti, Alessandro Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data |
title | Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data |
title_full | Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data |
title_short | Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data |
title_sort | machine learning algorithms for activity-intensity recognition using accelerometer data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomeseduardo machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata AT bertiniluciano machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata AT camposwagnerrangel machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata AT sobralanapaula machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata AT mocaiberizabela machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata AT copettialessandro machinelearningalgorithmsforactivityintensityrecognitionusingaccelerometerdata |