Cargando…
Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies
There is increasing interest in the use of technology to support social health in dementia. The primary objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of effectiveness of digital technologies used by people with dementia to improve self-management and social participation. Records pu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33562749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040604 |
_version_ | 1783657306093780992 |
---|---|
author | Neal, David van den Berg, Floor Planting, Caroline Ettema, Teake Dijkstra, Karin Finnema, Evelyn Dröes, Rose-Marie |
author_facet | Neal, David van den Berg, Floor Planting, Caroline Ettema, Teake Dijkstra, Karin Finnema, Evelyn Dröes, Rose-Marie |
author_sort | Neal, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is increasing interest in the use of technology to support social health in dementia. The primary objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of effectiveness of digital technologies used by people with dementia to improve self-management and social participation. Records published from 1 January 2007 to 9 April 2020 were identified from Pubmed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Controlled interventional studies evaluating interventions based on any digital technology were included if: primary users of the technology had dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI); and the study reported outcomes relevant to self-management or social participation. Studies were clustered by population, intervention, and outcomes, and narrative synthesis was undertaken. Of 1394 records identified, nine met the inclusion criteria: two were deemed to be of poor methodological quality, six of fair quality, and one of good quality. Three clusters of technologies were identified: virtual reality, wearables, and software applications. We identified weak evidence that digital technologies may provide less benefit to people with dementia than people with MCI. Future research should address the methodological limitations and narrow scope of existing work. In the absence of strong evidence, clinicians and caregivers must use their judgement to appraise available technologies on a case-by-case basis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7915697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79156972021-03-01 Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies Neal, David van den Berg, Floor Planting, Caroline Ettema, Teake Dijkstra, Karin Finnema, Evelyn Dröes, Rose-Marie J Clin Med Review There is increasing interest in the use of technology to support social health in dementia. The primary objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence of effectiveness of digital technologies used by people with dementia to improve self-management and social participation. Records published from 1 January 2007 to 9 April 2020 were identified from Pubmed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Controlled interventional studies evaluating interventions based on any digital technology were included if: primary users of the technology had dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI); and the study reported outcomes relevant to self-management or social participation. Studies were clustered by population, intervention, and outcomes, and narrative synthesis was undertaken. Of 1394 records identified, nine met the inclusion criteria: two were deemed to be of poor methodological quality, six of fair quality, and one of good quality. Three clusters of technologies were identified: virtual reality, wearables, and software applications. We identified weak evidence that digital technologies may provide less benefit to people with dementia than people with MCI. Future research should address the methodological limitations and narrow scope of existing work. In the absence of strong evidence, clinicians and caregivers must use their judgement to appraise available technologies on a case-by-case basis. MDPI 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7915697/ /pubmed/33562749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040604 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Neal, David van den Berg, Floor Planting, Caroline Ettema, Teake Dijkstra, Karin Finnema, Evelyn Dröes, Rose-Marie Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies |
title | Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies |
title_full | Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies |
title_fullStr | Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies |
title_short | Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies |
title_sort | can use of digital technologies by people with dementia improve self-management and social participation? a systematic review of effect studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33562749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nealdavid canuseofdigitaltechnologiesbypeoplewithdementiaimproveselfmanagementandsocialparticipationasystematicreviewofeffectstudies AT vandenbergfloor canuseofdigitaltechnologiesbypeoplewithdementiaimproveselfmanagementandsocialparticipationasystematicreviewofeffectstudies AT plantingcaroline canuseofdigitaltechnologiesbypeoplewithdementiaimproveselfmanagementandsocialparticipationasystematicreviewofeffectstudies AT ettemateake canuseofdigitaltechnologiesbypeoplewithdementiaimproveselfmanagementandsocialparticipationasystematicreviewofeffectstudies AT dijkstrakarin canuseofdigitaltechnologiesbypeoplewithdementiaimproveselfmanagementandsocialparticipationasystematicreviewofeffectstudies AT finnemaevelyn canuseofdigitaltechnologiesbypeoplewithdementiaimproveselfmanagementandsocialparticipationasystematicreviewofeffectstudies AT droesrosemarie canuseofdigitaltechnologiesbypeoplewithdementiaimproveselfmanagementandsocialparticipationasystematicreviewofeffectstudies |