Cargando…
Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition
The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) is one of the most common tools for assessing the fundamental movement skills (FMS) in children between 3 and 10 years. This study aimed to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the TGMD—3rd Edition (TGMD-3) between expert and novice raters...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041652 |
_version_ | 1783657377950597120 |
---|---|
author | Carballo-Fazanes, Aida Rey, Ezequiel Valentini, Nadia C. Rodríguez-Fernández, José E. Varela-Casal, Cristina Rico-Díaz, Javier Barcala-Furelos, Roberto Abelairas-Gómez, Cristian |
author_facet | Carballo-Fazanes, Aida Rey, Ezequiel Valentini, Nadia C. Rodríguez-Fernández, José E. Varela-Casal, Cristina Rico-Díaz, Javier Barcala-Furelos, Roberto Abelairas-Gómez, Cristian |
author_sort | Carballo-Fazanes, Aida |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) is one of the most common tools for assessing the fundamental movement skills (FMS) in children between 3 and 10 years. This study aimed to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the TGMD—3rd Edition (TGMD-3) between expert and novice raters using live and video assessment. Five raters [2 experts and 3 novices (one of them BSc in Physical Education and Sport Science)] assessed and scored the performance of the TGMD-3 of 25 healthy children [Female: 60%; mean (standard deviation) age 9.16 (1.31)]. Schoolchildren were attending at one public elementary school during the academic year 2019–2020 from Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Raters scored each children performance through two viewing moods (live and slow-motion). The ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) was used to determine the agreement between raters. Our results showed moderate-to-excellent intra-rater reliability for overall score and locomotor and ball skills subscales; moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability for overall and ball skills; and poor-to-good for locomotor subscale. Higher intra-rater reliability was achieved by the expert raters and novice rater with physical education background compared to novice raters. However, the inter-rater reliability was more variable in all the raters regardless of their experience or background. No significant differences in reliability were found when comparing live and video assessments. For clinical practice, it would be recommended that raters reach an agreement before the assessment to avoid subjective interpretations that might distort the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7915997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79159972021-03-01 Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition Carballo-Fazanes, Aida Rey, Ezequiel Valentini, Nadia C. Rodríguez-Fernández, José E. Varela-Casal, Cristina Rico-Díaz, Javier Barcala-Furelos, Roberto Abelairas-Gómez, Cristian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) is one of the most common tools for assessing the fundamental movement skills (FMS) in children between 3 and 10 years. This study aimed to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the TGMD—3rd Edition (TGMD-3) between expert and novice raters using live and video assessment. Five raters [2 experts and 3 novices (one of them BSc in Physical Education and Sport Science)] assessed and scored the performance of the TGMD-3 of 25 healthy children [Female: 60%; mean (standard deviation) age 9.16 (1.31)]. Schoolchildren were attending at one public elementary school during the academic year 2019–2020 from Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Raters scored each children performance through two viewing moods (live and slow-motion). The ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) was used to determine the agreement between raters. Our results showed moderate-to-excellent intra-rater reliability for overall score and locomotor and ball skills subscales; moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability for overall and ball skills; and poor-to-good for locomotor subscale. Higher intra-rater reliability was achieved by the expert raters and novice rater with physical education background compared to novice raters. However, the inter-rater reliability was more variable in all the raters regardless of their experience or background. No significant differences in reliability were found when comparing live and video assessments. For clinical practice, it would be recommended that raters reach an agreement before the assessment to avoid subjective interpretations that might distort the results. MDPI 2021-02-09 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7915997/ /pubmed/33572298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041652 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Carballo-Fazanes, Aida Rey, Ezequiel Valentini, Nadia C. Rodríguez-Fernández, José E. Varela-Casal, Cristina Rico-Díaz, Javier Barcala-Furelos, Roberto Abelairas-Gómez, Cristian Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition |
title | Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition |
title_full | Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition |
title_fullStr | Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition |
title_full_unstemmed | Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition |
title_short | Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition |
title_sort | intra-rater (live vs. video assessment) and inter-rater (expert vs. novice) reliability of the test of gross motor development—third edition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572298 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carballofazanesaida intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition AT reyezequiel intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition AT valentininadiac intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition AT rodriguezfernandezjosee intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition AT varelacasalcristina intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition AT ricodiazjavier intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition AT barcalafurelosroberto intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition AT abelairasgomezcristian intraraterlivevsvideoassessmentandinterraterexpertvsnovicereliabilityofthetestofgrossmotordevelopmentthirdedition |