Cargando…

Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation

The binders povidone (Kollidon 30), copovidone (Kollidon VA64), hypromellose (Pharmacoat 606), and three types of hyprolose (HPC SSL-SFP, HPC SSL, and HPC SL-FP) were evaluated regarding their suitability in twin-screw wet granulation. Six mixtures of lactose and binder as well as lactose without bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köster, Claudia, Pohl, Sebastian, Kleinebudde, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020241
_version_ 1783657433772589056
author Köster, Claudia
Pohl, Sebastian
Kleinebudde, Peter
author_facet Köster, Claudia
Pohl, Sebastian
Kleinebudde, Peter
author_sort Köster, Claudia
collection PubMed
description The binders povidone (Kollidon 30), copovidone (Kollidon VA64), hypromellose (Pharmacoat 606), and three types of hyprolose (HPC SSL-SFP, HPC SSL, and HPC SL-FP) were evaluated regarding their suitability in twin-screw wet granulation. Six mixtures of lactose and binder as well as lactose without binder were twin-screw granulated with demineralized water at different barrel fill levels and subsequently tableted. A screening run with HPC SSL determined the amount of water as an influential parameter for oversized agglomerates. Subsequent examination of different binders, especially Kollidon 30 and Kollidon VA64 resulted in large granules. All binders, except Pharmacoat 606, led to a reduction of fines compared to granulation without a binder. The molecular weight of applied hyproloses did not appear as influential. Tableting required an upstream sieving step to remove overlarge granules. Tableting was possible for all formulations at sufficient compression pressure. Most binders resulted in comparable tensile strengths, while Pharmacoat 606 led to lower and lactose without a binder to the lowest tensile strength. Tablets without a binder disintegrated easily, whereas binder containing tablets of sufficient tensile strength often nearly failed or failed the disintegration test. Especially tablets containing Pharmacoat 606 and HPC SL-FP disintegrated too slowly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7916237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79162372021-03-01 Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation Köster, Claudia Pohl, Sebastian Kleinebudde, Peter Pharmaceutics Article The binders povidone (Kollidon 30), copovidone (Kollidon VA64), hypromellose (Pharmacoat 606), and three types of hyprolose (HPC SSL-SFP, HPC SSL, and HPC SL-FP) were evaluated regarding their suitability in twin-screw wet granulation. Six mixtures of lactose and binder as well as lactose without binder were twin-screw granulated with demineralized water at different barrel fill levels and subsequently tableted. A screening run with HPC SSL determined the amount of water as an influential parameter for oversized agglomerates. Subsequent examination of different binders, especially Kollidon 30 and Kollidon VA64 resulted in large granules. All binders, except Pharmacoat 606, led to a reduction of fines compared to granulation without a binder. The molecular weight of applied hyproloses did not appear as influential. Tableting required an upstream sieving step to remove overlarge granules. Tableting was possible for all formulations at sufficient compression pressure. Most binders resulted in comparable tensile strengths, while Pharmacoat 606 led to lower and lactose without a binder to the lowest tensile strength. Tablets without a binder disintegrated easily, whereas binder containing tablets of sufficient tensile strength often nearly failed or failed the disintegration test. Especially tablets containing Pharmacoat 606 and HPC SL-FP disintegrated too slowly. MDPI 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7916237/ /pubmed/33572394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020241 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Köster, Claudia
Pohl, Sebastian
Kleinebudde, Peter
Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation
title Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation
title_full Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation
title_fullStr Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation
title_short Evaluation of Binders in Twin-Screw Wet Granulation
title_sort evaluation of binders in twin-screw wet granulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33572394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13020241
work_keys_str_mv AT kosterclaudia evaluationofbindersintwinscrewwetgranulation
AT pohlsebastian evaluationofbindersintwinscrewwetgranulation
AT kleinebuddepeter evaluationofbindersintwinscrewwetgranulation