Cargando…

Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study

BACKGROUND: Double J ureteral stents are widely used on urological patients to provide drainage of the upper urinary tract. Unfourtunately, ureteral stents are not free from complications, as bacterial colonization and require a second procedure for removal. The purpose of the current comparative ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soria, Federico, de La Cruz, Julia E., Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo, Pamplona, Manuel, Pérez-Fentes, Daniel, Resel-Folskerma, Luis, Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00802-x
_version_ 1783657443417391104
author Soria, Federico
de La Cruz, Julia E.
Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo
Pamplona, Manuel
Pérez-Fentes, Daniel
Resel-Folskerma, Luis
Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
author_facet Soria, Federico
de La Cruz, Julia E.
Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo
Pamplona, Manuel
Pérez-Fentes, Daniel
Resel-Folskerma, Luis
Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
author_sort Soria, Federico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Double J ureteral stents are widely used on urological patients to provide drainage of the upper urinary tract. Unfourtunately, ureteral stents are not free from complications, as bacterial colonization and require a second procedure for removal. The purpose of the current comparative experimental study is to evaluate a new heparin-coated biodegradable antireflux ureteral stent (BraidStent®-H) to prevent urinary bacterial colonization. METHODS: A total of 24 female pigs were underwent determination of bacteriuria and nephrosonographic, endoscopic and contrast fluoroscopy assessment of the urinary tract. Afterward, were randomly assigned animals to Group-I, in which a 5Fr double-pigtail ureteral stent was placed for 6 weeks, or Group-II, in which a BraidStent®-H was placed. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1, 3, 6, 8, 12 weeks. The final follow-up includes the above methods and an exhaustive pathological study of the urinary tract was accomplished after 20 weeks. RESULTS: Bacteriuria findings in the first 48 h were significant between groups at 6 h and 12 h. Asymptomatic bacteriuria does not reach 100% of the animals in Group-II until 48 h versus Group-I where it appears at 6 h. The weekly bacteriuria mean rate was 27.7% and 44.4% in Group I and II respectively, without statistical significance. In Group II there were no animals with vesicoureteral reflux, with statistical significance at 3 and 6 weeks with Group-I. The 91.2% of stents in Group-II were degraded between 3 and 6 weeks, without obstructive fragments. Distal ureteral peristalsis was maintained in 66.6–75% in Group-II at 1–6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The heparin coating of BraidStent® allows an early decrease of bacterial colonization, but its effectiveness is low at the long term. Heparin coating did not affect scheduled degradation rate or size of stents fragments. BraidStent®-H avoids the side effects associated with current ureteral stents, thus should cause less discomfort to patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7916282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79162822021-03-02 Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study Soria, Federico de La Cruz, Julia E. Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo Pamplona, Manuel Pérez-Fentes, Daniel Resel-Folskerma, Luis Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M. BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Double J ureteral stents are widely used on urological patients to provide drainage of the upper urinary tract. Unfourtunately, ureteral stents are not free from complications, as bacterial colonization and require a second procedure for removal. The purpose of the current comparative experimental study is to evaluate a new heparin-coated biodegradable antireflux ureteral stent (BraidStent®-H) to prevent urinary bacterial colonization. METHODS: A total of 24 female pigs were underwent determination of bacteriuria and nephrosonographic, endoscopic and contrast fluoroscopy assessment of the urinary tract. Afterward, were randomly assigned animals to Group-I, in which a 5Fr double-pigtail ureteral stent was placed for 6 weeks, or Group-II, in which a BraidStent®-H was placed. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1, 3, 6, 8, 12 weeks. The final follow-up includes the above methods and an exhaustive pathological study of the urinary tract was accomplished after 20 weeks. RESULTS: Bacteriuria findings in the first 48 h were significant between groups at 6 h and 12 h. Asymptomatic bacteriuria does not reach 100% of the animals in Group-II until 48 h versus Group-I where it appears at 6 h. The weekly bacteriuria mean rate was 27.7% and 44.4% in Group I and II respectively, without statistical significance. In Group II there were no animals with vesicoureteral reflux, with statistical significance at 3 and 6 weeks with Group-I. The 91.2% of stents in Group-II were degraded between 3 and 6 weeks, without obstructive fragments. Distal ureteral peristalsis was maintained in 66.6–75% in Group-II at 1–6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The heparin coating of BraidStent® allows an early decrease of bacterial colonization, but its effectiveness is low at the long term. Heparin coating did not affect scheduled degradation rate or size of stents fragments. BraidStent®-H avoids the side effects associated with current ureteral stents, thus should cause less discomfort to patients. BioMed Central 2021-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7916282/ /pubmed/33639905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00802-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Soria, Federico
de La Cruz, Julia E.
Caballero-Romeu, Juan Pablo
Pamplona, Manuel
Pérez-Fentes, Daniel
Resel-Folskerma, Luis
Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study
title Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study
title_full Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study
title_short Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study
title_sort comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33639905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00802-x
work_keys_str_mv AT soriafederico comparativeassessmentofbiodegradableantirefluxheparinecoatedureteralstentanimalmodelstudy
AT delacruzjuliae comparativeassessmentofbiodegradableantirefluxheparinecoatedureteralstentanimalmodelstudy
AT caballeroromeujuanpablo comparativeassessmentofbiodegradableantirefluxheparinecoatedureteralstentanimalmodelstudy
AT pamplonamanuel comparativeassessmentofbiodegradableantirefluxheparinecoatedureteralstentanimalmodelstudy
AT perezfentesdaniel comparativeassessmentofbiodegradableantirefluxheparinecoatedureteralstentanimalmodelstudy
AT reselfolskermaluis comparativeassessmentofbiodegradableantirefluxheparinecoatedureteralstentanimalmodelstudy
AT sanchezmargallofranciscom comparativeassessmentofbiodegradableantirefluxheparinecoatedureteralstentanimalmodelstudy