Cargando…
Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses
Textural characteristics of fruit are important for their quality, storability, and consumer acceptance. While texture can be evaluated instrumentally or sensorially, instrumental measurements are preferred if they can be reliably related to human perception. The objectives of this research were to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10020384 |
_version_ | 1783657464050221056 |
---|---|
author | Bejaei, Masoumeh Stanich, Kareen Cliff, Margaret A. |
author_facet | Bejaei, Masoumeh Stanich, Kareen Cliff, Margaret A. |
author_sort | Bejaei, Masoumeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Textural characteristics of fruit are important for their quality, storability, and consumer acceptance. While texture can be evaluated instrumentally or sensorially, instrumental measurements are preferred if they can be reliably related to human perception. The objectives of this research were to validate instrumental measurements with sensory determinations, develop a classification scheme to group apples by their textural characteristics, and create models to predict sensory attributes from instrumental and compositional analyses. The textural characteristics (crispness, hardness, juiciness, and skin toughness) of 12 apple cultivars were evaluated on new and established cultivars. Fruit was also evaluated using five instrumental measurements from TA.XTplus Texture Analyzer, and three compositional determinations. The experiment was repeated for analysis and validation purposes. Principal component (PC) analysis revealed that 95.88% of the variation in the instrumental determinations could be explained by two components (PC 1 and PC 2); which were highly correlated with flesh firmness and skin strength, respectively. Four textural groups of apples were identified, and the accuracy of classification was established at 94.44% by using linear discriminant analysis. The predictive models that were developed between the sensory and instrumental-compositional data explained more than 85% of the variation in the data for hardness and crispness, while models for juiciness and skin toughness were more complex. The work should assist industry personnel to reduce time-consuming and costly sensory testing, yet have an appreciation of the textural traits as perceived by the consumer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7916372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79163722021-03-01 Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses Bejaei, Masoumeh Stanich, Kareen Cliff, Margaret A. Foods Article Textural characteristics of fruit are important for their quality, storability, and consumer acceptance. While texture can be evaluated instrumentally or sensorially, instrumental measurements are preferred if they can be reliably related to human perception. The objectives of this research were to validate instrumental measurements with sensory determinations, develop a classification scheme to group apples by their textural characteristics, and create models to predict sensory attributes from instrumental and compositional analyses. The textural characteristics (crispness, hardness, juiciness, and skin toughness) of 12 apple cultivars were evaluated on new and established cultivars. Fruit was also evaluated using five instrumental measurements from TA.XTplus Texture Analyzer, and three compositional determinations. The experiment was repeated for analysis and validation purposes. Principal component (PC) analysis revealed that 95.88% of the variation in the instrumental determinations could be explained by two components (PC 1 and PC 2); which were highly correlated with flesh firmness and skin strength, respectively. Four textural groups of apples were identified, and the accuracy of classification was established at 94.44% by using linear discriminant analysis. The predictive models that were developed between the sensory and instrumental-compositional data explained more than 85% of the variation in the data for hardness and crispness, while models for juiciness and skin toughness were more complex. The work should assist industry personnel to reduce time-consuming and costly sensory testing, yet have an appreciation of the textural traits as perceived by the consumer. MDPI 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7916372/ /pubmed/33578667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10020384 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bejaei, Masoumeh Stanich, Kareen Cliff, Margaret A. Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses |
title | Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses |
title_full | Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses |
title_fullStr | Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses |
title_short | Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses |
title_sort | modelling and classification of apple textural attributes using sensory, instrumental and compositional analyses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10020384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bejaeimasoumeh modellingandclassificationofappletexturalattributesusingsensoryinstrumentalandcompositionalanalyses AT stanichkareen modellingandclassificationofappletexturalattributesusingsensoryinstrumentalandcompositionalanalyses AT cliffmargareta modellingandclassificationofappletexturalattributesusingsensoryinstrumentalandcompositionalanalyses |