Cargando…

Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries

BACKGROUND: Despite the life-saving work they perform, community health workers (CHWs) have long been subject to global debate about their remuneration. There is now, however, an emerging consensus that CHWs should be paid. As the discussion evolves from whether to financially remunerate CHWs to how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballard, Madeleine, Westgate, Carey, Alban, Rebecca, Choudhury, Nandini, Adamjee, Rehan, Schwarz, Ryan, Bishop, Julia, McLaughlin, Meg, Flood, David, Finnegan, Karen, Rogers, Ash, Olsen, Helen, Johnson, Ari, Palazuelos, Daniel, Schechter, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society of Global Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692894
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04010
_version_ 1783657478450315264
author Ballard, Madeleine
Westgate, Carey
Alban, Rebecca
Choudhury, Nandini
Adamjee, Rehan
Schwarz, Ryan
Bishop, Julia
McLaughlin, Meg
Flood, David
Finnegan, Karen
Rogers, Ash
Olsen, Helen
Johnson, Ari
Palazuelos, Daniel
Schechter, Jennifer
author_facet Ballard, Madeleine
Westgate, Carey
Alban, Rebecca
Choudhury, Nandini
Adamjee, Rehan
Schwarz, Ryan
Bishop, Julia
McLaughlin, Meg
Flood, David
Finnegan, Karen
Rogers, Ash
Olsen, Helen
Johnson, Ari
Palazuelos, Daniel
Schechter, Jennifer
author_sort Ballard, Madeleine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the life-saving work they perform, community health workers (CHWs) have long been subject to global debate about their remuneration. There is now, however, an emerging consensus that CHWs should be paid. As the discussion evolves from whether to financially remunerate CHWs to how to do so, there is an urgent need to better understand the types of CHW payment models and their implications. METHODS: This study examines the legal framework on CHW compensation in five countries: Brazil, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa. In order to map the characteristics of each approach, a review of the regulatory framework governing CHW compensation in each country was undertaken. Law firms in each of the five countries were engaged to support the identification and interpretation of relevant legal documents. To guide the search and aid in the creation of uniform country profiles, a standardized set of questions was developed, covering: (i) legal requirements for CHW compensation, (ii) CHW compensation mechanisms, and (iii) CHW legal protections and benefits. RESULTS: The five countries profiled represent possible archetypes for CHW compensation: Brazil (public), Ghana (volunteer-based), Nigeria (private), Rwanda (cooperatives with performance based incentives) and South Africa (hybrid public/private). Advantages and disadvantages of each model with respect to (i) CHWs, in terms of financial protection, and (ii) the health system, in terms of ease of implementation, are outlined. CONCLUSIONS: While a strong legal framework does not necessarily translate into high-quality implementation of compensation practices, it is the first necessary step. Certain approaches to CHW compensation – particularly public-sector or models with public sector wage floors – best institutionalize recommended CHW protections. Political will and long-term financing often remain challenges; removing ecosystem barriers – such as multilateral and bilateral restrictions on the payment of salaries – can help governments institutionalize CHW payment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7916445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Society of Global Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79164452021-03-09 Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries Ballard, Madeleine Westgate, Carey Alban, Rebecca Choudhury, Nandini Adamjee, Rehan Schwarz, Ryan Bishop, Julia McLaughlin, Meg Flood, David Finnegan, Karen Rogers, Ash Olsen, Helen Johnson, Ari Palazuelos, Daniel Schechter, Jennifer J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Despite the life-saving work they perform, community health workers (CHWs) have long been subject to global debate about their remuneration. There is now, however, an emerging consensus that CHWs should be paid. As the discussion evolves from whether to financially remunerate CHWs to how to do so, there is an urgent need to better understand the types of CHW payment models and their implications. METHODS: This study examines the legal framework on CHW compensation in five countries: Brazil, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa. In order to map the characteristics of each approach, a review of the regulatory framework governing CHW compensation in each country was undertaken. Law firms in each of the five countries were engaged to support the identification and interpretation of relevant legal documents. To guide the search and aid in the creation of uniform country profiles, a standardized set of questions was developed, covering: (i) legal requirements for CHW compensation, (ii) CHW compensation mechanisms, and (iii) CHW legal protections and benefits. RESULTS: The five countries profiled represent possible archetypes for CHW compensation: Brazil (public), Ghana (volunteer-based), Nigeria (private), Rwanda (cooperatives with performance based incentives) and South Africa (hybrid public/private). Advantages and disadvantages of each model with respect to (i) CHWs, in terms of financial protection, and (ii) the health system, in terms of ease of implementation, are outlined. CONCLUSIONS: While a strong legal framework does not necessarily translate into high-quality implementation of compensation practices, it is the first necessary step. Certain approaches to CHW compensation – particularly public-sector or models with public sector wage floors – best institutionalize recommended CHW protections. Political will and long-term financing often remain challenges; removing ecosystem barriers – such as multilateral and bilateral restrictions on the payment of salaries – can help governments institutionalize CHW payment. International Society of Global Health 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7916445/ /pubmed/33692894 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04010 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Ballard, Madeleine
Westgate, Carey
Alban, Rebecca
Choudhury, Nandini
Adamjee, Rehan
Schwarz, Ryan
Bishop, Julia
McLaughlin, Meg
Flood, David
Finnegan, Karen
Rogers, Ash
Olsen, Helen
Johnson, Ari
Palazuelos, Daniel
Schechter, Jennifer
Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries
title Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries
title_full Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries
title_fullStr Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries
title_full_unstemmed Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries
title_short Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries
title_sort compensation models for community health workers: comparison of legal frameworks across five countries
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33692894
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04010
work_keys_str_mv AT ballardmadeleine compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT westgatecarey compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT albanrebecca compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT choudhurynandini compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT adamjeerehan compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT schwarzryan compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT bishopjulia compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT mclaughlinmeg compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT flooddavid compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT finnegankaren compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT rogersash compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT olsenhelen compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT johnsonari compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT palazuelosdaniel compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries
AT schechterjennifer compensationmodelsforcommunityhealthworkerscomparisonoflegalframeworksacrossfivecountries