Cargando…
Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin
BACKGROUND: An occurrence of secondary caries around the indirect restoration margin is reported to remain a leading cause of failures. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the interfacial microleakage of conventional glass-ionomer (CGI), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and Nano-hybrid composite...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665019 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10823 |
_version_ | 1783657498123698176 |
---|---|
author | Haralur, Satheesh B. AL Ghaseb, Ghaseb Ahmed Alqahtani, Norah Ali Alqahtani, Bader |
author_facet | Haralur, Satheesh B. AL Ghaseb, Ghaseb Ahmed Alqahtani, Norah Ali Alqahtani, Bader |
author_sort | Haralur, Satheesh B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An occurrence of secondary caries around the indirect restoration margin is reported to remain a leading cause of failures. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the interfacial microleakage of conventional glass-ionomer (CGI), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and Nano-hybrid composite (CR) restorations at a full veneer margin crown. METHODS: Ninety human extracted molar teeth were divided into three groups (n = 30). Each group was subdivided into three subgroups (n = 10) according to the extent of the structural defects; The structural defect in G1 had a depth of 1.5 mm, width and length at 2 mm and 1 mm intrusion within the crown cervical margin. The corresponding structural defect dimension values for G2 were 2, 5, 4 and 2 mm with defects extending onto the root structure. Meanwhile, G3: structural deficiency of 2 mm depth, 3 mm width and 3 mm length and with 1.5 mm extension into the prepared teeth. These structural defects in each subgroup were restored with CGI, RMGI and CR. Artificial carious lesion formation was induced at the cervical finish line with a demineralizing solution. The artificial carious lesions were restored as per the group distribution. Subsequently, teeth samples were prepared and cemented with Nickel-chromium full coverage restorations utilizing glass-ionomer luting cement. Teeth samples were thermocycled, isolated with nail varnish, and immersed in 0.1% methylene blue for 24 h. The teeth samples were sectioned longitudinally, dye penetration was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests. RESULTS: CGI-G1 recorded the highest micro-leakage score at 1.450; while CR-G3 recorded the least score (0.350). At a cementum-restoration interface, CR-G1 (0.850) documented the lowest micro-leakage; RMGI-G3 had a greater value at 1.700. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid CR could be effectively used to restore the restoration of a marginal gap around crown margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7916530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79165302021-03-03 Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin Haralur, Satheesh B. AL Ghaseb, Ghaseb Ahmed Alqahtani, Norah Ali Alqahtani, Bader PeerJ Dentistry BACKGROUND: An occurrence of secondary caries around the indirect restoration margin is reported to remain a leading cause of failures. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the interfacial microleakage of conventional glass-ionomer (CGI), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and Nano-hybrid composite (CR) restorations at a full veneer margin crown. METHODS: Ninety human extracted molar teeth were divided into three groups (n = 30). Each group was subdivided into three subgroups (n = 10) according to the extent of the structural defects; The structural defect in G1 had a depth of 1.5 mm, width and length at 2 mm and 1 mm intrusion within the crown cervical margin. The corresponding structural defect dimension values for G2 were 2, 5, 4 and 2 mm with defects extending onto the root structure. Meanwhile, G3: structural deficiency of 2 mm depth, 3 mm width and 3 mm length and with 1.5 mm extension into the prepared teeth. These structural defects in each subgroup were restored with CGI, RMGI and CR. Artificial carious lesion formation was induced at the cervical finish line with a demineralizing solution. The artificial carious lesions were restored as per the group distribution. Subsequently, teeth samples were prepared and cemented with Nickel-chromium full coverage restorations utilizing glass-ionomer luting cement. Teeth samples were thermocycled, isolated with nail varnish, and immersed in 0.1% methylene blue for 24 h. The teeth samples were sectioned longitudinally, dye penetration was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests. RESULTS: CGI-G1 recorded the highest micro-leakage score at 1.450; while CR-G3 recorded the least score (0.350). At a cementum-restoration interface, CR-G1 (0.850) documented the lowest micro-leakage; RMGI-G3 had a greater value at 1.700. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid CR could be effectively used to restore the restoration of a marginal gap around crown margins. PeerJ Inc. 2021-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7916530/ /pubmed/33665019 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10823 Text en © 2021 Haralur et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Dentistry Haralur, Satheesh B. AL Ghaseb, Ghaseb Ahmed Alqahtani, Norah Ali Alqahtani, Bader Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin |
title | Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin |
title_full | Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin |
title_fullStr | Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin |
title_short | Comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin |
title_sort | comparison of microleakage between different restorative materials to restore marginal gap at crown margin |
topic | Dentistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33665019 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haralursatheeshb comparisonofmicroleakagebetweendifferentrestorativematerialstorestoremarginalgapatcrownmargin AT alghasebghasebahmed comparisonofmicroleakagebetweendifferentrestorativematerialstorestoremarginalgapatcrownmargin AT alqahtaninorahali comparisonofmicroleakagebetweendifferentrestorativematerialstorestoremarginalgapatcrownmargin AT alqahtanibader comparisonofmicroleakagebetweendifferentrestorativematerialstorestoremarginalgapatcrownmargin |