Cargando…
Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System
We have developed an integrated caregiver patient-portal system (i.e., patient–caregiver portal) that (1) allows a patient to identify their primary caregiver and their communication preferences with that caregiver in the healthcare setting; (2) connects the caregiver to a unique portal page to indi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020193 |
_version_ | 1783657500722069504 |
---|---|
author | Longacre, Margaret L. Keleher, Cynthia Chwistek, Marcin Odelberg, Michelle Siemon, Mark Collins, Molly Fang, Carolyn Y. |
author_facet | Longacre, Margaret L. Keleher, Cynthia Chwistek, Marcin Odelberg, Michelle Siemon, Mark Collins, Molly Fang, Carolyn Y. |
author_sort | Longacre, Margaret L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We have developed an integrated caregiver patient-portal system (i.e., patient–caregiver portal) that (1) allows a patient to identify their primary caregiver and their communication preferences with that caregiver in the healthcare setting; (2) connects the caregiver to a unique portal page to indicate their needs; and (3) informs the healthcare team of patient and caregiver responses to aid in integrating the caregiver. The purpose of this manuscript is to report on the formative phases (Phases I and II) of system development. Phase I involved a pre-assessment to anticipate complexity or barriers in the system design and future implementation. We used the non-adaption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework and rubric to conduct this pre-assessment. Phase II involved exploring reactions (i.e., concerns or benefits) to the system among a small sample of stakeholders (i.e., 5 palliative oncology patients and their caregivers, N = 10). The purpose of these two phases was to identify system changes prior to conducting usability testing among patient/caregiver dyads in palliative oncology (phase III). Completion of the NASSS rubric highlighted potential implementation barriers, such as the non-uniformity of caregiving, disparities in portal use, and a lack of cost–benefit (value) findings in the literature. The dyads’ feedback reinforced several NASSS ratings, including the benefits of connecting caregivers and allowing for caregiver voice as well as the concerns of limited use of patient-portals by the patients (but not the caregivers) and the need for user assistance during stressful health events. One change that resulted from this analysis was ensuring that we provided research participants (users) with detailed guidance and support on how to log in and use a patient–caregiver portal. In future iterations, we will also consider allowing more than one caregiver to be included and incorporating additional strategies to enable caregivers to interact in the system as part of the care team (e.g., via email). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7916542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79165422021-03-01 Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System Longacre, Margaret L. Keleher, Cynthia Chwistek, Marcin Odelberg, Michelle Siemon, Mark Collins, Molly Fang, Carolyn Y. Healthcare (Basel) Article We have developed an integrated caregiver patient-portal system (i.e., patient–caregiver portal) that (1) allows a patient to identify their primary caregiver and their communication preferences with that caregiver in the healthcare setting; (2) connects the caregiver to a unique portal page to indicate their needs; and (3) informs the healthcare team of patient and caregiver responses to aid in integrating the caregiver. The purpose of this manuscript is to report on the formative phases (Phases I and II) of system development. Phase I involved a pre-assessment to anticipate complexity or barriers in the system design and future implementation. We used the non-adaption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework and rubric to conduct this pre-assessment. Phase II involved exploring reactions (i.e., concerns or benefits) to the system among a small sample of stakeholders (i.e., 5 palliative oncology patients and their caregivers, N = 10). The purpose of these two phases was to identify system changes prior to conducting usability testing among patient/caregiver dyads in palliative oncology (phase III). Completion of the NASSS rubric highlighted potential implementation barriers, such as the non-uniformity of caregiving, disparities in portal use, and a lack of cost–benefit (value) findings in the literature. The dyads’ feedback reinforced several NASSS ratings, including the benefits of connecting caregivers and allowing for caregiver voice as well as the concerns of limited use of patient-portals by the patients (but not the caregivers) and the need for user assistance during stressful health events. One change that resulted from this analysis was ensuring that we provided research participants (users) with detailed guidance and support on how to log in and use a patient–caregiver portal. In future iterations, we will also consider allowing more than one caregiver to be included and incorporating additional strategies to enable caregivers to interact in the system as part of the care team (e.g., via email). MDPI 2021-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7916542/ /pubmed/33578838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020193 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Longacre, Margaret L. Keleher, Cynthia Chwistek, Marcin Odelberg, Michelle Siemon, Mark Collins, Molly Fang, Carolyn Y. Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System |
title | Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System |
title_full | Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System |
title_fullStr | Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System |
title_short | Developing an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System |
title_sort | developing an integrated caregiver patient-portal system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longacremargaretl developinganintegratedcaregiverpatientportalsystem AT kelehercynthia developinganintegratedcaregiverpatientportalsystem AT chwistekmarcin developinganintegratedcaregiverpatientportalsystem AT odelbergmichelle developinganintegratedcaregiverpatientportalsystem AT siemonmark developinganintegratedcaregiverpatientportalsystem AT collinsmolly developinganintegratedcaregiverpatientportalsystem AT fangcarolyny developinganintegratedcaregiverpatientportalsystem |