Cargando…

Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral

Perceived social support opportunities are central to successful exercise referral scheme (ERS) client experiences. However, there remains a lack of guidance on how ERSs can embed social support opportunities within their provision. This study presents retrospective acceptability findings from a 12-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Portman, Robert M., Levy, Andrew R., Maher, Anthony J., Fairclough, Stuart J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041720
_version_ 1783657527298228224
author Portman, Robert M.
Levy, Andrew R.
Maher, Anthony J.
Fairclough, Stuart J.
author_facet Portman, Robert M.
Levy, Andrew R.
Maher, Anthony J.
Fairclough, Stuart J.
author_sort Portman, Robert M.
collection PubMed
description Perceived social support opportunities are central to successful exercise referral scheme (ERS) client experiences. However, there remains a lack of guidance on how ERSs can embed social support opportunities within their provision. This study presents retrospective acceptability findings from a 12-week social-identity-informed peer support intervention to enhance perceived social support among clients of an English ERS. Five peer volunteers were recruited, trained, and deployed in supervised ERS sessions across two sites. Peers assisted exercise referral officers (EROs) by providing supplementary practical, informational, motivational, and emotional support to ERS clients. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with peers (n = 4), EROs (n = 2), and clients (n = 5) and analysed thematically. The analysis identified three primary themes. The first theme detailed how EROs utilised peer volunteers to supplement the ERS client experience. This theme delineated peer roles within the ERS context and identified salient individual peer characteristics that contributed to their success. The second theme described peer acceptability among the various stakeholders. Peers were valued for their ability to reduce burden on EROs and to enhance perceptions of comfort among ERS clients. The final theme presented participant feedback regarding how the intervention may be further refined and enhanced. Peers represented a cost-effective and acceptable means of providing auxiliary social support to ERS clients. Moving forward, the structured integration of peers can improve the accessibility of social support among ERS participants, thus facilitating better rates of ERS completion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7916654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79166542021-03-01 Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral Portman, Robert M. Levy, Andrew R. Maher, Anthony J. Fairclough, Stuart J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Perceived social support opportunities are central to successful exercise referral scheme (ERS) client experiences. However, there remains a lack of guidance on how ERSs can embed social support opportunities within their provision. This study presents retrospective acceptability findings from a 12-week social-identity-informed peer support intervention to enhance perceived social support among clients of an English ERS. Five peer volunteers were recruited, trained, and deployed in supervised ERS sessions across two sites. Peers assisted exercise referral officers (EROs) by providing supplementary practical, informational, motivational, and emotional support to ERS clients. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with peers (n = 4), EROs (n = 2), and clients (n = 5) and analysed thematically. The analysis identified three primary themes. The first theme detailed how EROs utilised peer volunteers to supplement the ERS client experience. This theme delineated peer roles within the ERS context and identified salient individual peer characteristics that contributed to their success. The second theme described peer acceptability among the various stakeholders. Peers were valued for their ability to reduce burden on EROs and to enhance perceptions of comfort among ERS clients. The final theme presented participant feedback regarding how the intervention may be further refined and enhanced. Peers represented a cost-effective and acceptable means of providing auxiliary social support to ERS clients. Moving forward, the structured integration of peers can improve the accessibility of social support among ERS participants, thus facilitating better rates of ERS completion. MDPI 2021-02-10 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7916654/ /pubmed/33578966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041720 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Portman, Robert M.
Levy, Andrew R.
Maher, Anthony J.
Fairclough, Stuart J.
Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral
title Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral
title_full Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral
title_fullStr Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral
title_short Multi-Stakeholder Retrospective Acceptability of a Peer Support Intervention for Exercise Referral
title_sort multi-stakeholder retrospective acceptability of a peer support intervention for exercise referral
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041720
work_keys_str_mv AT portmanrobertm multistakeholderretrospectiveacceptabilityofapeersupportinterventionforexercisereferral
AT levyandrewr multistakeholderretrospectiveacceptabilityofapeersupportinterventionforexercisereferral
AT maheranthonyj multistakeholderretrospectiveacceptabilityofapeersupportinterventionforexercisereferral
AT faircloughstuartj multistakeholderretrospectiveacceptabilityofapeersupportinterventionforexercisereferral