Cargando…

A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments

Acoustic event detection and analysis has been widely developed in the last few years for its valuable application in monitoring elderly or dependant people, for surveillance issues, for multimedia retrieval, or even for biodiversity metrics in natural environments. For this purpose, sound source id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonet-Solà, Daniel, Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041274
_version_ 1783657567512166400
author Bonet-Solà, Daniel
Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma
author_facet Bonet-Solà, Daniel
Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma
author_sort Bonet-Solà, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Acoustic event detection and analysis has been widely developed in the last few years for its valuable application in monitoring elderly or dependant people, for surveillance issues, for multimedia retrieval, or even for biodiversity metrics in natural environments. For this purpose, sound source identification is a key issue to give a smart technological answer to all the aforementioned applications. Diverse types of sounds and variate environments, together with a number of challenges in terms of application, widen the choice of artificial intelligence algorithm proposal. This paper presents a comparative study on combining several feature extraction algorithms (Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC), Gammatone Cepstrum Coefficients (GTCC), and Narrow Band (NB)) with a group of machine learning algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Neural Networks (NN), and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)), tested over five different acoustic environments. This work has the goal of detailing a best practice method and evaluate the reliability of this general-purpose algorithm for all the classes. Preliminary results show that most of the combinations of feature extraction and machine learning present acceptable results in most of the described corpora. Nevertheless, there is a combination that outperforms the others: the use of GTCC together with kNN, and its results are further analyzed for all the corpora.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7916834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79168342021-03-01 A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments Bonet-Solà, Daniel Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma Sensors (Basel) Article Acoustic event detection and analysis has been widely developed in the last few years for its valuable application in monitoring elderly or dependant people, for surveillance issues, for multimedia retrieval, or even for biodiversity metrics in natural environments. For this purpose, sound source identification is a key issue to give a smart technological answer to all the aforementioned applications. Diverse types of sounds and variate environments, together with a number of challenges in terms of application, widen the choice of artificial intelligence algorithm proposal. This paper presents a comparative study on combining several feature extraction algorithms (Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC), Gammatone Cepstrum Coefficients (GTCC), and Narrow Band (NB)) with a group of machine learning algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Neural Networks (NN), and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)), tested over five different acoustic environments. This work has the goal of detailing a best practice method and evaluate the reliability of this general-purpose algorithm for all the classes. Preliminary results show that most of the combinations of feature extraction and machine learning present acceptable results in most of the described corpora. Nevertheless, there is a combination that outperforms the others: the use of GTCC together with kNN, and its results are further analyzed for all the corpora. MDPI 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7916834/ /pubmed/33670096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041274 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bonet-Solà, Daniel
Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma
A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments
title A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments
title_full A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments
title_fullStr A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments
title_short A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments
title_sort comparative survey of feature extraction and machine learning methods in diverse acoustic environments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041274
work_keys_str_mv AT bonetsoladaniel acomparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments
AT alsinapagesrosama acomparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments
AT bonetsoladaniel comparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments
AT alsinapagesrosama comparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments