Cargando…
A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments
Acoustic event detection and analysis has been widely developed in the last few years for its valuable application in monitoring elderly or dependant people, for surveillance issues, for multimedia retrieval, or even for biodiversity metrics in natural environments. For this purpose, sound source id...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041274 |
_version_ | 1783657567512166400 |
---|---|
author | Bonet-Solà, Daniel Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma |
author_facet | Bonet-Solà, Daniel Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma |
author_sort | Bonet-Solà, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acoustic event detection and analysis has been widely developed in the last few years for its valuable application in monitoring elderly or dependant people, for surveillance issues, for multimedia retrieval, or even for biodiversity metrics in natural environments. For this purpose, sound source identification is a key issue to give a smart technological answer to all the aforementioned applications. Diverse types of sounds and variate environments, together with a number of challenges in terms of application, widen the choice of artificial intelligence algorithm proposal. This paper presents a comparative study on combining several feature extraction algorithms (Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC), Gammatone Cepstrum Coefficients (GTCC), and Narrow Band (NB)) with a group of machine learning algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Neural Networks (NN), and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)), tested over five different acoustic environments. This work has the goal of detailing a best practice method and evaluate the reliability of this general-purpose algorithm for all the classes. Preliminary results show that most of the combinations of feature extraction and machine learning present acceptable results in most of the described corpora. Nevertheless, there is a combination that outperforms the others: the use of GTCC together with kNN, and its results are further analyzed for all the corpora. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7916834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79168342021-03-01 A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments Bonet-Solà, Daniel Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma Sensors (Basel) Article Acoustic event detection and analysis has been widely developed in the last few years for its valuable application in monitoring elderly or dependant people, for surveillance issues, for multimedia retrieval, or even for biodiversity metrics in natural environments. For this purpose, sound source identification is a key issue to give a smart technological answer to all the aforementioned applications. Diverse types of sounds and variate environments, together with a number of challenges in terms of application, widen the choice of artificial intelligence algorithm proposal. This paper presents a comparative study on combining several feature extraction algorithms (Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC), Gammatone Cepstrum Coefficients (GTCC), and Narrow Band (NB)) with a group of machine learning algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Neural Networks (NN), and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)), tested over five different acoustic environments. This work has the goal of detailing a best practice method and evaluate the reliability of this general-purpose algorithm for all the classes. Preliminary results show that most of the combinations of feature extraction and machine learning present acceptable results in most of the described corpora. Nevertheless, there is a combination that outperforms the others: the use of GTCC together with kNN, and its results are further analyzed for all the corpora. MDPI 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7916834/ /pubmed/33670096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041274 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bonet-Solà, Daniel Alsina-Pagès, Rosa Ma A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments |
title | A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments |
title_full | A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments |
title_short | A Comparative Survey of Feature Extraction and Machine Learning Methods in Diverse Acoustic Environments |
title_sort | comparative survey of feature extraction and machine learning methods in diverse acoustic environments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonetsoladaniel acomparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments AT alsinapagesrosama acomparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments AT bonetsoladaniel comparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments AT alsinapagesrosama comparativesurveyoffeatureextractionandmachinelearningmethodsindiverseacousticenvironments |