Cargando…

Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. An electronic literature search was carried out, supplemented by a manual search. The literature search was completed in June 2020. The results o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnutenhaus, Sigmar, Edelmann, Cornelia, Knipper, Anne, Luthardt, Ralph G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040704
_version_ 1783657571681304576
author Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
Edelmann, Cornelia
Knipper, Anne
Luthardt, Ralph G.
author_facet Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
Edelmann, Cornelia
Knipper, Anne
Luthardt, Ralph G.
author_sort Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
collection PubMed
description The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. An electronic literature search was carried out, supplemented by a manual search. The literature search was completed in June 2020. The results of in vitro and clinical studies were recorded separately from each other. For inclusion in the review, the studies had to examine at least the prosthetically relevant parameters for angle deviation, as well as global deviation or lateral deviation at the platform of the implant. Sixteen of 320 articles were included in the investigation: nine in vitro and seven clinical studies. The meta-analysis showed values of 4.1° for the clinical studies (95% CI, 3.12–5.10) and 3.7° for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 2.31–5.10) in terms of the angle deviation. The global deviation at the implant apex of the implant was 1.00 mm for the clinical studies (95% CI, 0.83–1.16) and 0.91 mm for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 0.60–1.12). These values indicate no significant difference between the clinical and in vitro studies. The results of this systematic review show a clinical accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted navigation that is comparable to that of static navigation. However, the dynamic navigation systems show a great heterogeneity that must be taken into account. Moreover, currently there are few clinical data available. Therefore, further investigations into the practicability of dynamic navigation seem necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7916851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79168512021-03-01 Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies Schnutenhaus, Sigmar Edelmann, Cornelia Knipper, Anne Luthardt, Ralph G. J Clin Med Review The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. An electronic literature search was carried out, supplemented by a manual search. The literature search was completed in June 2020. The results of in vitro and clinical studies were recorded separately from each other. For inclusion in the review, the studies had to examine at least the prosthetically relevant parameters for angle deviation, as well as global deviation or lateral deviation at the platform of the implant. Sixteen of 320 articles were included in the investigation: nine in vitro and seven clinical studies. The meta-analysis showed values of 4.1° for the clinical studies (95% CI, 3.12–5.10) and 3.7° for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 2.31–5.10) in terms of the angle deviation. The global deviation at the implant apex of the implant was 1.00 mm for the clinical studies (95% CI, 0.83–1.16) and 0.91 mm for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 0.60–1.12). These values indicate no significant difference between the clinical and in vitro studies. The results of this systematic review show a clinical accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted navigation that is comparable to that of static navigation. However, the dynamic navigation systems show a great heterogeneity that must be taken into account. Moreover, currently there are few clinical data available. Therefore, further investigations into the practicability of dynamic navigation seem necessary. MDPI 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7916851/ /pubmed/33670136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040704 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
Edelmann, Cornelia
Knipper, Anne
Luthardt, Ralph G.
Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies
title Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies
title_full Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies
title_fullStr Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies
title_short Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies
title_sort accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and in vitro studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670136
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040704
work_keys_str_mv AT schnutenhaussigmar accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies
AT edelmanncornelia accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies
AT knipperanne accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies
AT luthardtralphg accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies