Cargando…
Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. An electronic literature search was carried out, supplemented by a manual search. The literature search was completed in June 2020. The results o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040704 |
_version_ | 1783657571681304576 |
---|---|
author | Schnutenhaus, Sigmar Edelmann, Cornelia Knipper, Anne Luthardt, Ralph G. |
author_facet | Schnutenhaus, Sigmar Edelmann, Cornelia Knipper, Anne Luthardt, Ralph G. |
author_sort | Schnutenhaus, Sigmar |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. An electronic literature search was carried out, supplemented by a manual search. The literature search was completed in June 2020. The results of in vitro and clinical studies were recorded separately from each other. For inclusion in the review, the studies had to examine at least the prosthetically relevant parameters for angle deviation, as well as global deviation or lateral deviation at the platform of the implant. Sixteen of 320 articles were included in the investigation: nine in vitro and seven clinical studies. The meta-analysis showed values of 4.1° for the clinical studies (95% CI, 3.12–5.10) and 3.7° for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 2.31–5.10) in terms of the angle deviation. The global deviation at the implant apex of the implant was 1.00 mm for the clinical studies (95% CI, 0.83–1.16) and 0.91 mm for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 0.60–1.12). These values indicate no significant difference between the clinical and in vitro studies. The results of this systematic review show a clinical accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted navigation that is comparable to that of static navigation. However, the dynamic navigation systems show a great heterogeneity that must be taken into account. Moreover, currently there are few clinical data available. Therefore, further investigations into the practicability of dynamic navigation seem necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7916851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79168512021-03-01 Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies Schnutenhaus, Sigmar Edelmann, Cornelia Knipper, Anne Luthardt, Ralph G. J Clin Med Review The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. An electronic literature search was carried out, supplemented by a manual search. The literature search was completed in June 2020. The results of in vitro and clinical studies were recorded separately from each other. For inclusion in the review, the studies had to examine at least the prosthetically relevant parameters for angle deviation, as well as global deviation or lateral deviation at the platform of the implant. Sixteen of 320 articles were included in the investigation: nine in vitro and seven clinical studies. The meta-analysis showed values of 4.1° for the clinical studies (95% CI, 3.12–5.10) and 3.7° for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 2.31–5.10) in terms of the angle deviation. The global deviation at the implant apex of the implant was 1.00 mm for the clinical studies (95% CI, 0.83–1.16) and 0.91 mm for the in vitro studies (95% CI, 0.60–1.12). These values indicate no significant difference between the clinical and in vitro studies. The results of this systematic review show a clinical accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted navigation that is comparable to that of static navigation. However, the dynamic navigation systems show a great heterogeneity that must be taken into account. Moreover, currently there are few clinical data available. Therefore, further investigations into the practicability of dynamic navigation seem necessary. MDPI 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7916851/ /pubmed/33670136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040704 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Schnutenhaus, Sigmar Edelmann, Cornelia Knipper, Anne Luthardt, Ralph G. Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies |
title | Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies |
title_full | Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies |
title_short | Accuracy of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In Vitro Studies |
title_sort | accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and in vitro studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7916851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040704 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnutenhaussigmar accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies AT edelmanncornelia accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies AT knipperanne accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies AT luthardtralphg accuracyofdynamiccomputerassistedimplantplacementasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicalandinvitrostudies |