Cargando…
Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders
Background: Sheep milk (SM) is a possible alternate dairy source for those who experience digestive symptoms with cow milk (CM). While both the milks contain lactose, one of the causes for self-reported intolerance to CM, the composition of SM and CM also differs across proteins and fats, which have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.603816 |
_version_ | 1783657635051995136 |
---|---|
author | Shrestha, Aahana Samuelsson, Linda M. Sharma, Pankaja Day, Li Cameron-Smith, David Milan, Amber M. |
author_facet | Shrestha, Aahana Samuelsson, Linda M. Sharma, Pankaja Day, Li Cameron-Smith, David Milan, Amber M. |
author_sort | Shrestha, Aahana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Sheep milk (SM) is a possible alternate dairy source for those who experience digestive symptoms with cow milk (CM). While both the milks contain lactose, one of the causes for self-reported intolerance to CM, the composition of SM and CM also differs across proteins and fats, which have been shown to impact digestive processes. Objective: To compare the acute digestive comfort and lactose malabsorption of SM to CM in female dairy avoiders. Method: In a double-blinded, randomized cross over trial, 30 dairy-avoiding females (aged 20–30 years) drank 650 mL of SM or CM (each reconstituted from spray dried powder) following an overnight fast, on two separate occasions at least 1 week apart. Blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin assessment, and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the lactase (LCT) gene (C/T(13910) and G/A(22018)). Breath H(2) and visual analog scale (VAS) digestive symptom scores were recorded at fasting and regular intervals over 4 h after ingestion. Results: Eighty percentage of study participants were lactase non-persistent (LNP; CC(13910) and GG(22018) genotype). Digestive symptoms, including abdominal cramps, distension, rumbling, bloating, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, vomiting, and nausea, were similar in response to SM and CM ingestion (milk × time, P > 0.05). Breath H(2) was greater after CM than SM (72 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 6 ppm at 240 min, P < 0.001), which may be due to greater lactose content in CM (33 vs. 25 g). Accordingly, when corrected for the lactose content breath H(2) did not differ between the two milks. The response remained similar when analyzed in the LNP subset alone (n = 20). Conclusions: Despite a higher energy and nutrient content, SM did not increase adverse digestive symptoms after ingestion, relative to CM, although there was a reduced breath H(2) response, which could be attributed to the lower lactose content in SM. The tolerability of SM should be explored in populations without lactose intolerance for whom underlying trigger for intolerance is unknown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7917135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79171352021-03-02 Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders Shrestha, Aahana Samuelsson, Linda M. Sharma, Pankaja Day, Li Cameron-Smith, David Milan, Amber M. Front Nutr Nutrition Background: Sheep milk (SM) is a possible alternate dairy source for those who experience digestive symptoms with cow milk (CM). While both the milks contain lactose, one of the causes for self-reported intolerance to CM, the composition of SM and CM also differs across proteins and fats, which have been shown to impact digestive processes. Objective: To compare the acute digestive comfort and lactose malabsorption of SM to CM in female dairy avoiders. Method: In a double-blinded, randomized cross over trial, 30 dairy-avoiding females (aged 20–30 years) drank 650 mL of SM or CM (each reconstituted from spray dried powder) following an overnight fast, on two separate occasions at least 1 week apart. Blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin assessment, and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the lactase (LCT) gene (C/T(13910) and G/A(22018)). Breath H(2) and visual analog scale (VAS) digestive symptom scores were recorded at fasting and regular intervals over 4 h after ingestion. Results: Eighty percentage of study participants were lactase non-persistent (LNP; CC(13910) and GG(22018) genotype). Digestive symptoms, including abdominal cramps, distension, rumbling, bloating, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, vomiting, and nausea, were similar in response to SM and CM ingestion (milk × time, P > 0.05). Breath H(2) was greater after CM than SM (72 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 6 ppm at 240 min, P < 0.001), which may be due to greater lactose content in CM (33 vs. 25 g). Accordingly, when corrected for the lactose content breath H(2) did not differ between the two milks. The response remained similar when analyzed in the LNP subset alone (n = 20). Conclusions: Despite a higher energy and nutrient content, SM did not increase adverse digestive symptoms after ingestion, relative to CM, although there was a reduced breath H(2) response, which could be attributed to the lower lactose content in SM. The tolerability of SM should be explored in populations without lactose intolerance for whom underlying trigger for intolerance is unknown. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7917135/ /pubmed/33659266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.603816 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shrestha, Samuelsson, Sharma, Day, Cameron-Smith and Milan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Shrestha, Aahana Samuelsson, Linda M. Sharma, Pankaja Day, Li Cameron-Smith, David Milan, Amber M. Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders |
title | Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders |
title_full | Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders |
title_fullStr | Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders |
title_short | Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders |
title_sort | comparing response of sheep and cow milk on acute digestive comfort and lactose malabsorption: a randomized controlled trial in female dairy avoiders |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.603816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shresthaaahana comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders AT samuelssonlindam comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders AT sharmapankaja comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders AT dayli comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders AT cameronsmithdavid comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders AT milanamberm comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders |