Cargando…

Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders

Background: Sheep milk (SM) is a possible alternate dairy source for those who experience digestive symptoms with cow milk (CM). While both the milks contain lactose, one of the causes for self-reported intolerance to CM, the composition of SM and CM also differs across proteins and fats, which have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Aahana, Samuelsson, Linda M., Sharma, Pankaja, Day, Li, Cameron-Smith, David, Milan, Amber M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.603816
_version_ 1783657635051995136
author Shrestha, Aahana
Samuelsson, Linda M.
Sharma, Pankaja
Day, Li
Cameron-Smith, David
Milan, Amber M.
author_facet Shrestha, Aahana
Samuelsson, Linda M.
Sharma, Pankaja
Day, Li
Cameron-Smith, David
Milan, Amber M.
author_sort Shrestha, Aahana
collection PubMed
description Background: Sheep milk (SM) is a possible alternate dairy source for those who experience digestive symptoms with cow milk (CM). While both the milks contain lactose, one of the causes for self-reported intolerance to CM, the composition of SM and CM also differs across proteins and fats, which have been shown to impact digestive processes. Objective: To compare the acute digestive comfort and lactose malabsorption of SM to CM in female dairy avoiders. Method: In a double-blinded, randomized cross over trial, 30 dairy-avoiding females (aged 20–30 years) drank 650 mL of SM or CM (each reconstituted from spray dried powder) following an overnight fast, on two separate occasions at least 1 week apart. Blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin assessment, and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the lactase (LCT) gene (C/T(13910) and G/A(22018)). Breath H(2) and visual analog scale (VAS) digestive symptom scores were recorded at fasting and regular intervals over 4 h after ingestion. Results: Eighty percentage of study participants were lactase non-persistent (LNP; CC(13910) and GG(22018) genotype). Digestive symptoms, including abdominal cramps, distension, rumbling, bloating, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, vomiting, and nausea, were similar in response to SM and CM ingestion (milk × time, P > 0.05). Breath H(2) was greater after CM than SM (72 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 6 ppm at 240 min, P < 0.001), which may be due to greater lactose content in CM (33 vs. 25 g). Accordingly, when corrected for the lactose content breath H(2) did not differ between the two milks. The response remained similar when analyzed in the LNP subset alone (n = 20). Conclusions: Despite a higher energy and nutrient content, SM did not increase adverse digestive symptoms after ingestion, relative to CM, although there was a reduced breath H(2) response, which could be attributed to the lower lactose content in SM. The tolerability of SM should be explored in populations without lactose intolerance for whom underlying trigger for intolerance is unknown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7917135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79171352021-03-02 Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders Shrestha, Aahana Samuelsson, Linda M. Sharma, Pankaja Day, Li Cameron-Smith, David Milan, Amber M. Front Nutr Nutrition Background: Sheep milk (SM) is a possible alternate dairy source for those who experience digestive symptoms with cow milk (CM). While both the milks contain lactose, one of the causes for self-reported intolerance to CM, the composition of SM and CM also differs across proteins and fats, which have been shown to impact digestive processes. Objective: To compare the acute digestive comfort and lactose malabsorption of SM to CM in female dairy avoiders. Method: In a double-blinded, randomized cross over trial, 30 dairy-avoiding females (aged 20–30 years) drank 650 mL of SM or CM (each reconstituted from spray dried powder) following an overnight fast, on two separate occasions at least 1 week apart. Blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin assessment, and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the lactase (LCT) gene (C/T(13910) and G/A(22018)). Breath H(2) and visual analog scale (VAS) digestive symptom scores were recorded at fasting and regular intervals over 4 h after ingestion. Results: Eighty percentage of study participants were lactase non-persistent (LNP; CC(13910) and GG(22018) genotype). Digestive symptoms, including abdominal cramps, distension, rumbling, bloating, belching, diarrhea, flatulence, vomiting, and nausea, were similar in response to SM and CM ingestion (milk × time, P > 0.05). Breath H(2) was greater after CM than SM (72 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 6 ppm at 240 min, P < 0.001), which may be due to greater lactose content in CM (33 vs. 25 g). Accordingly, when corrected for the lactose content breath H(2) did not differ between the two milks. The response remained similar when analyzed in the LNP subset alone (n = 20). Conclusions: Despite a higher energy and nutrient content, SM did not increase adverse digestive symptoms after ingestion, relative to CM, although there was a reduced breath H(2) response, which could be attributed to the lower lactose content in SM. The tolerability of SM should be explored in populations without lactose intolerance for whom underlying trigger for intolerance is unknown. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7917135/ /pubmed/33659266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.603816 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shrestha, Samuelsson, Sharma, Day, Cameron-Smith and Milan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Shrestha, Aahana
Samuelsson, Linda M.
Sharma, Pankaja
Day, Li
Cameron-Smith, David
Milan, Amber M.
Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders
title Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders
title_full Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders
title_fullStr Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders
title_short Comparing Response of Sheep and Cow Milk on Acute Digestive Comfort and Lactose Malabsorption: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Female Dairy Avoiders
title_sort comparing response of sheep and cow milk on acute digestive comfort and lactose malabsorption: a randomized controlled trial in female dairy avoiders
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33659266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.603816
work_keys_str_mv AT shresthaaahana comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders
AT samuelssonlindam comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders
AT sharmapankaja comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders
AT dayli comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders
AT cameronsmithdavid comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders
AT milanamberm comparingresponseofsheepandcowmilkonacutedigestivecomfortandlactosemalabsorptionarandomizedcontrolledtrialinfemaledairyavoiders