Cargando…

Treatment with antifibrotic agents in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis with usual interstitial pneumonia

BACKGROUND: There are no established therapeutic options available for idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) apart from supportive care and lung transplantation. Furthermore, it is known that IPPFE with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern and lower lobe predominance is a disea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugino, Keishi, Ono, Hirotaka, Shimizu, Hiroshige, Kurosawa, Takeyuki, Matsumoto, Keiko, Ando, Masahiro, Mori, Kiyoshi, Tsuboi, Eiyasu, Homma, Sakae, Kishi, Kazuma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00196-2020
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There are no established therapeutic options available for idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) apart from supportive care and lung transplantation. Furthermore, it is known that IPPFE with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern and lower lobe predominance is a disease entity distinct from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). To our knowledge, few studies are available that report on the efficacy of antifibrotic agents for IPPFE with UIP. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of antifibrotic agents between IPPFE with UIP and typical IPF in real-world clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of all patients at two interstitial lung disease centres. Sixty-four patients were diagnosed as having IPPFE with UIP and 195 patients were diagnosed with typical IPF. We compared the efficacy of antifibrotic agents between these two groups. RESULTS: Survival time was significantly shorter in the patients with IPPFE with UIP. Some 125 patients were administered antifibrotic agents for over 6 months (34 with IPPFE with UIP and 91 with typical IPF). Reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) 6 months after treatment with antifibrotic agents was significantly greater in the IPPFE with UIP group than in those in the typical IPF group. Moreover, the change in % predicted FVC was significantly greater during the follow-up in patients with IPPFE with UIP compared with those with typical IPF. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of antifibrotic agents was limited in patients with IPPFE with UIP. Thus, IPPFE with UIP remains a fatal and progressive disease.