Cargando…

“Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery

PURPOSE: To assess the biometry and postoperative refraction in iris repair using ArtificialIris in combination with an intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Germany. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayer, Christian, Khoramnia, Ramin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33658755
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S302224
_version_ 1783657675840552960
author Mayer, Christian
Khoramnia, Ramin
author_facet Mayer, Christian
Khoramnia, Ramin
author_sort Mayer, Christian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the biometry and postoperative refraction in iris repair using ArtificialIris in combination with an intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Germany. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We included 44 aniridic and aphakic eyes for IOL implantation in combination with iris prosthesis reconstruction. The iris prostheses were either sutured into the ciliary sulcus and fixed by transscleral suturing or were implanted together with a capsular tension ring and the IOL in the capsular bag. The primary outcomes measured were pre- and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (CDVA), objective and subjective refraction, anterior chamber depth and optical biometry comparing common IOL formulae. RESULTS: Reasons for surgery were trauma (39 eyes), iatrogenic causes (1 eye), aniridic state after severe iritis (2 eyes) or iris tumor (2 eyes). Monocular CDVA improved significantly (p<0.0001) from median 0.55 logMAR (0.0 to 1.98) to 0.16 logMAR (−0.08 to 2.0). There were no significant differences between the postoperative target refraction calculated by the formulae “Haigis”, “Hoffer-Q”, “SRK/T” and “Holladay 1” (p=0.68). The absolute deviation from target refraction did not differ significantly between the formulae (p=0.87). Median target refraction was −0.42 D (−4.0 to 1.68). Postoperatively median spherical equivalent was 0.00 D (−5.38 to 2.38). Median absolute deviation from target refraction after 5 months of follow-up was 0.98 D (0.06 to 5.17). CONCLUSION: Postoperative refraction using common techniques and using preoperative biometry revealed a well predictable postoperative refraction. There is no correction factor needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7917327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79173272021-03-02 “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the biometry and postoperative refraction in iris repair using ArtificialIris in combination with an intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Germany. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We included 44 aniridic and aphakic eyes for IOL implantation in combination with iris prosthesis reconstruction. The iris prostheses were either sutured into the ciliary sulcus and fixed by transscleral suturing or were implanted together with a capsular tension ring and the IOL in the capsular bag. The primary outcomes measured were pre- and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (CDVA), objective and subjective refraction, anterior chamber depth and optical biometry comparing common IOL formulae. RESULTS: Reasons for surgery were trauma (39 eyes), iatrogenic causes (1 eye), aniridic state after severe iritis (2 eyes) or iris tumor (2 eyes). Monocular CDVA improved significantly (p<0.0001) from median 0.55 logMAR (0.0 to 1.98) to 0.16 logMAR (−0.08 to 2.0). There were no significant differences between the postoperative target refraction calculated by the formulae “Haigis”, “Hoffer-Q”, “SRK/T” and “Holladay 1” (p=0.68). The absolute deviation from target refraction did not differ significantly between the formulae (p=0.87). Median target refraction was −0.42 D (−4.0 to 1.68). Postoperatively median spherical equivalent was 0.00 D (−5.38 to 2.38). Median absolute deviation from target refraction after 5 months of follow-up was 0.98 D (0.06 to 5.17). CONCLUSION: Postoperative refraction using common techniques and using preoperative biometry revealed a well predictable postoperative refraction. There is no correction factor needed. Dove 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7917327/ /pubmed/33658755 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S302224 Text en © 2021 Mayer and Khoramnia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Mayer, Christian
Khoramnia, Ramin
“Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery
title “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery
title_full “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery
title_fullStr “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery
title_full_unstemmed “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery
title_short “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery
title_sort “double prosthesis implantation”: biometry and refractive outcomes in combined intraocular lens and artificial iris surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33658755
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S302224
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerchristian doubleprosthesisimplantationbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesincombinedintraocularlensandartificialirissurgery
AT khoramniaramin doubleprosthesisimplantationbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesincombinedintraocularlensandartificialirissurgery