Cargando…
“Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery
PURPOSE: To assess the biometry and postoperative refraction in iris repair using ArtificialIris in combination with an intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Germany. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33658755 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S302224 |
_version_ | 1783657675840552960 |
---|---|
author | Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin |
author_facet | Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin |
author_sort | Mayer, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the biometry and postoperative refraction in iris repair using ArtificialIris in combination with an intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Germany. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We included 44 aniridic and aphakic eyes for IOL implantation in combination with iris prosthesis reconstruction. The iris prostheses were either sutured into the ciliary sulcus and fixed by transscleral suturing or were implanted together with a capsular tension ring and the IOL in the capsular bag. The primary outcomes measured were pre- and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (CDVA), objective and subjective refraction, anterior chamber depth and optical biometry comparing common IOL formulae. RESULTS: Reasons for surgery were trauma (39 eyes), iatrogenic causes (1 eye), aniridic state after severe iritis (2 eyes) or iris tumor (2 eyes). Monocular CDVA improved significantly (p<0.0001) from median 0.55 logMAR (0.0 to 1.98) to 0.16 logMAR (−0.08 to 2.0). There were no significant differences between the postoperative target refraction calculated by the formulae “Haigis”, “Hoffer-Q”, “SRK/T” and “Holladay 1” (p=0.68). The absolute deviation from target refraction did not differ significantly between the formulae (p=0.87). Median target refraction was −0.42 D (−4.0 to 1.68). Postoperatively median spherical equivalent was 0.00 D (−5.38 to 2.38). Median absolute deviation from target refraction after 5 months of follow-up was 0.98 D (0.06 to 5.17). CONCLUSION: Postoperative refraction using common techniques and using preoperative biometry revealed a well predictable postoperative refraction. There is no correction factor needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7917327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79173272021-03-02 “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the biometry and postoperative refraction in iris repair using ArtificialIris in combination with an intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Germany. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We included 44 aniridic and aphakic eyes for IOL implantation in combination with iris prosthesis reconstruction. The iris prostheses were either sutured into the ciliary sulcus and fixed by transscleral suturing or were implanted together with a capsular tension ring and the IOL in the capsular bag. The primary outcomes measured were pre- and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (CDVA), objective and subjective refraction, anterior chamber depth and optical biometry comparing common IOL formulae. RESULTS: Reasons for surgery were trauma (39 eyes), iatrogenic causes (1 eye), aniridic state after severe iritis (2 eyes) or iris tumor (2 eyes). Monocular CDVA improved significantly (p<0.0001) from median 0.55 logMAR (0.0 to 1.98) to 0.16 logMAR (−0.08 to 2.0). There were no significant differences between the postoperative target refraction calculated by the formulae “Haigis”, “Hoffer-Q”, “SRK/T” and “Holladay 1” (p=0.68). The absolute deviation from target refraction did not differ significantly between the formulae (p=0.87). Median target refraction was −0.42 D (−4.0 to 1.68). Postoperatively median spherical equivalent was 0.00 D (−5.38 to 2.38). Median absolute deviation from target refraction after 5 months of follow-up was 0.98 D (0.06 to 5.17). CONCLUSION: Postoperative refraction using common techniques and using preoperative biometry revealed a well predictable postoperative refraction. There is no correction factor needed. Dove 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7917327/ /pubmed/33658755 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S302224 Text en © 2021 Mayer and Khoramnia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mayer, Christian Khoramnia, Ramin “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery |
title | “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery |
title_full | “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery |
title_fullStr | “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery |
title_short | “Double Prosthesis Implantation”: Biometry and Refractive Outcomes in Combined Intraocular Lens and Artificial Iris Surgery |
title_sort | “double prosthesis implantation”: biometry and refractive outcomes in combined intraocular lens and artificial iris surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33658755 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S302224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayerchristian doubleprosthesisimplantationbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesincombinedintraocularlensandartificialirissurgery AT khoramniaramin doubleprosthesisimplantationbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesincombinedintraocularlensandartificialirissurgery |