Cargando…

YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis

YouTube is a popular video-sharing platform commonly visited by patients and healthcare professionals for medical information. Gout is the most frequent cause of inflammatory arthritis in adults. However, the accuracy and quality of gout-related information on YouTube are not fully known. Thus, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onder, Mustafa Erkut, Zengin, Orhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33646342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7
_version_ 1783657686137569280
author Onder, Mustafa Erkut
Zengin, Orhan
author_facet Onder, Mustafa Erkut
Zengin, Orhan
author_sort Onder, Mustafa Erkut
collection PubMed
description YouTube is a popular video-sharing platform commonly visited by patients and healthcare professionals for medical information. Gout is the most frequent cause of inflammatory arthritis in adults. However, the accuracy and quality of gout-related information on YouTube are not fully known. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the reliability and quality of YouTube videos pertaining to gout. A YouTube search was conducted using the keywords “gout”, “gout arthritis”, “gout treatment”, and “gout diet”. Of the 240 videos screened, 114 that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The number of days since upload, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments and duration of the videos were recorded. A Modified DISCERN tool and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) were used to evaluate the reliability and quality of the videos. Of the 114 analyzed videos, 87.72% were deemed as useful while 12.28% contained misleading information with higher viewership. The most common topic was “gout diet”. The majority of the videos demonstrated high quality (57.89%), followed by intermediate quality (28.95%) while the percentage of low-quality videos was 13.16%. Videos posted by academic institutions/professional organizations and physicians had higher modified DISCERN and GQS scores indicating higher reliability and quality. This study demonstrated that the majority of YouTube videos on gout provide useful information. However, physicians should be aware of the limited nature of YouTube and correct any misinformation during face-to-face meetings. YouTube should consider avoiding misleading videos using validity scales such as modified DISCERN and GQS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7917371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79173712021-03-01 YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis Onder, Mustafa Erkut Zengin, Orhan Rheumatol Int Observational Research YouTube is a popular video-sharing platform commonly visited by patients and healthcare professionals for medical information. Gout is the most frequent cause of inflammatory arthritis in adults. However, the accuracy and quality of gout-related information on YouTube are not fully known. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the reliability and quality of YouTube videos pertaining to gout. A YouTube search was conducted using the keywords “gout”, “gout arthritis”, “gout treatment”, and “gout diet”. Of the 240 videos screened, 114 that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The number of days since upload, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments and duration of the videos were recorded. A Modified DISCERN tool and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) were used to evaluate the reliability and quality of the videos. Of the 114 analyzed videos, 87.72% were deemed as useful while 12.28% contained misleading information with higher viewership. The most common topic was “gout diet”. The majority of the videos demonstrated high quality (57.89%), followed by intermediate quality (28.95%) while the percentage of low-quality videos was 13.16%. Videos posted by academic institutions/professional organizations and physicians had higher modified DISCERN and GQS scores indicating higher reliability and quality. This study demonstrated that the majority of YouTube videos on gout provide useful information. However, physicians should be aware of the limited nature of YouTube and correct any misinformation during face-to-face meetings. YouTube should consider avoiding misleading videos using validity scales such as modified DISCERN and GQS. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-01 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7917371/ /pubmed/33646342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Observational Research
Onder, Mustafa Erkut
Zengin, Orhan
YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis
title YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis
title_full YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis
title_fullStr YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis
title_full_unstemmed YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis
title_short YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis
title_sort youtube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis
topic Observational Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33646342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04813-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ondermustafaerkut youtubeasasourceofinformationongoutaqualityanalysis
AT zenginorhan youtubeasasourceofinformationongoutaqualityanalysis