Cargando…

Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems

The conventional two-dimensional (2D) culture is available as an in vitro experimental model. However, the culture system reportedly does not recapitulate the in vivo cancer microenvironment. We recently developed a tissueoid cell culture system using Cellbed, which resembles the loose connective ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikari, Ryo, Mukaisho, Ken-ichi, Kageyama, Susumu, Nagasawa, Masayuki, Kubota, Shigehisa, Nakayama, Takahisa, Murakami, Shoko, Taniura, Naoko, Tanaka, Hiroyuki, Kushima, Ryoji P., Kawauchi, Akihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041805
_version_ 1783657751206952960
author Ikari, Ryo
Mukaisho, Ken-ichi
Kageyama, Susumu
Nagasawa, Masayuki
Kubota, Shigehisa
Nakayama, Takahisa
Murakami, Shoko
Taniura, Naoko
Tanaka, Hiroyuki
Kushima, Ryoji P.
Kawauchi, Akihiro
author_facet Ikari, Ryo
Mukaisho, Ken-ichi
Kageyama, Susumu
Nagasawa, Masayuki
Kubota, Shigehisa
Nakayama, Takahisa
Murakami, Shoko
Taniura, Naoko
Tanaka, Hiroyuki
Kushima, Ryoji P.
Kawauchi, Akihiro
author_sort Ikari, Ryo
collection PubMed
description The conventional two-dimensional (2D) culture is available as an in vitro experimental model. However, the culture system reportedly does not recapitulate the in vivo cancer microenvironment. We recently developed a tissueoid cell culture system using Cellbed, which resembles the loose connective tissue in living organisms. The present study performed 2D and three-dimensional (3D) culture using prostate and bladder cancer cell lines and a comprehensive metabolome analysis. Compared to 3D, the 2D culture had significantly lower levels of most metabolites. The 3D culture system did not impair mitochondrial function in the cancer cells and produce energy through the mitochondria simultaneously with aerobic glycolysis. Conversely, ATP production, biomass (nucleotides, amino acids, lipids and NADPH) synthesis and redox balance maintenance were conducted in 3D culture. In contrast, in 2D culture, biomass production was delayed due to the suppression of metabolic activity. The 3D metabolome analysis using the tissueoid cell culture system capable of in vivo cancer cell culture yielded results consistent with previously reported cancer metabolism theories. This system is expected to be an essential experimental tool in a wide range of cancer research fields, especially in preclinical stages while transitioning from in vitro to in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7917672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79176722021-03-02 Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems Ikari, Ryo Mukaisho, Ken-ichi Kageyama, Susumu Nagasawa, Masayuki Kubota, Shigehisa Nakayama, Takahisa Murakami, Shoko Taniura, Naoko Tanaka, Hiroyuki Kushima, Ryoji P. Kawauchi, Akihiro Int J Mol Sci Article The conventional two-dimensional (2D) culture is available as an in vitro experimental model. However, the culture system reportedly does not recapitulate the in vivo cancer microenvironment. We recently developed a tissueoid cell culture system using Cellbed, which resembles the loose connective tissue in living organisms. The present study performed 2D and three-dimensional (3D) culture using prostate and bladder cancer cell lines and a comprehensive metabolome analysis. Compared to 3D, the 2D culture had significantly lower levels of most metabolites. The 3D culture system did not impair mitochondrial function in the cancer cells and produce energy through the mitochondria simultaneously with aerobic glycolysis. Conversely, ATP production, biomass (nucleotides, amino acids, lipids and NADPH) synthesis and redox balance maintenance were conducted in 3D culture. In contrast, in 2D culture, biomass production was delayed due to the suppression of metabolic activity. The 3D metabolome analysis using the tissueoid cell culture system capable of in vivo cancer cell culture yielded results consistent with previously reported cancer metabolism theories. This system is expected to be an essential experimental tool in a wide range of cancer research fields, especially in preclinical stages while transitioning from in vitro to in vivo. MDPI 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7917672/ /pubmed/33670390 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041805 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ikari, Ryo
Mukaisho, Ken-ichi
Kageyama, Susumu
Nagasawa, Masayuki
Kubota, Shigehisa
Nakayama, Takahisa
Murakami, Shoko
Taniura, Naoko
Tanaka, Hiroyuki
Kushima, Ryoji P.
Kawauchi, Akihiro
Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems
title Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems
title_full Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems
title_fullStr Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems
title_short Differences in the Central Energy Metabolism of Cancer Cells between Conventional 2D and Novel 3D Culture Systems
title_sort differences in the central energy metabolism of cancer cells between conventional 2d and novel 3d culture systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041805
work_keys_str_mv AT ikariryo differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT mukaishokenichi differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT kageyamasusumu differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT nagasawamasayuki differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT kubotashigehisa differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT nakayamatakahisa differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT murakamishoko differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT taniuranaoko differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT tanakahiroyuki differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT kushimaryojip differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems
AT kawauchiakihiro differencesinthecentralenergymetabolismofcancercellsbetweenconventional2dandnovel3dculturesystems