Cargando…

Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis

We conducted quantitative analysis of the recovery process during pure iron annealing using the modified Williamson-Hall and Warren-Averbach methods. We prepared four types of specimens with different dislocation substructures. By increasing the annealing temperature, we confirmed a decrease in disl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugiyama, Shota, Ogawa, Toshio, He, Lei, Wang, Zhilei, Adachi, Yoshitaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040895
_version_ 1783657780606926848
author Sugiyama, Shota
Ogawa, Toshio
He, Lei
Wang, Zhilei
Adachi, Yoshitaka
author_facet Sugiyama, Shota
Ogawa, Toshio
He, Lei
Wang, Zhilei
Adachi, Yoshitaka
author_sort Sugiyama, Shota
collection PubMed
description We conducted quantitative analysis of the recovery process during pure iron annealing using the modified Williamson-Hall and Warren-Averbach methods. We prepared four types of specimens with different dislocation substructures. By increasing the annealing temperature, we confirmed a decrease in dislocation density. In particular, screw-dislocation density substantially decreased in the early stage of the recovery process, while edge-dislocation density gradually decreased as annealing temperature increased. Moreover, changes in hardness during the recovery process mainly depended on edge-dislocation density. Increases in annealing temperature weakly affected the dislocation arrangement parameter and crystallite size. Recovery-process modeling demonstrated that the decrease in screw-dislocation density during the recovery process was mainly dominated by glide and/or cross-slip with dislocation core diffusion. In contrast, the decrease in edge-dislocation density during the recovery process was governed by a climbing motion with both dislocation core diffusion and lattice self-diffusion. From the above results, we succeeded in quantitatively distinguishing between edge- and screw-dislocation density during the recovery process, which are difficult to distinguish using transmission electron microscope and electron backscatter diffraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7917800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79178002021-03-02 Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis Sugiyama, Shota Ogawa, Toshio He, Lei Wang, Zhilei Adachi, Yoshitaka Materials (Basel) Article We conducted quantitative analysis of the recovery process during pure iron annealing using the modified Williamson-Hall and Warren-Averbach methods. We prepared four types of specimens with different dislocation substructures. By increasing the annealing temperature, we confirmed a decrease in dislocation density. In particular, screw-dislocation density substantially decreased in the early stage of the recovery process, while edge-dislocation density gradually decreased as annealing temperature increased. Moreover, changes in hardness during the recovery process mainly depended on edge-dislocation density. Increases in annealing temperature weakly affected the dislocation arrangement parameter and crystallite size. Recovery-process modeling demonstrated that the decrease in screw-dislocation density during the recovery process was mainly dominated by glide and/or cross-slip with dislocation core diffusion. In contrast, the decrease in edge-dislocation density during the recovery process was governed by a climbing motion with both dislocation core diffusion and lattice self-diffusion. From the above results, we succeeded in quantitatively distinguishing between edge- and screw-dislocation density during the recovery process, which are difficult to distinguish using transmission electron microscope and electron backscatter diffraction. MDPI 2021-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7917800/ /pubmed/33668535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040895 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sugiyama, Shota
Ogawa, Toshio
He, Lei
Wang, Zhilei
Adachi, Yoshitaka
Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis
title Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis
title_full Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis
title_fullStr Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis
title_short Quantitative Analysis of the Recovery Process in Pure Iron Using X-ray Diffraction Line Profile Analysis
title_sort quantitative analysis of the recovery process in pure iron using x-ray diffraction line profile analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040895
work_keys_str_mv AT sugiyamashota quantitativeanalysisoftherecoveryprocessinpureironusingxraydiffractionlineprofileanalysis
AT ogawatoshio quantitativeanalysisoftherecoveryprocessinpureironusingxraydiffractionlineprofileanalysis
AT helei quantitativeanalysisoftherecoveryprocessinpureironusingxraydiffractionlineprofileanalysis
AT wangzhilei quantitativeanalysisoftherecoveryprocessinpureironusingxraydiffractionlineprofileanalysis
AT adachiyoshitaka quantitativeanalysisoftherecoveryprocessinpureironusingxraydiffractionlineprofileanalysis