Cargando…

A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery

OBJECTIVES: The Internet, especially YouTube, is an important and growing source of medical information. The content of this information is poorly evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the quality of YouTube video content on meniscus repair. The hypothesis was that this source of inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigonney, François, Steltzlen, Camille, Bouché, Pierre Alban, Pujol, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917866/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00013
_version_ 1783657796131094528
author Sigonney, François
Steltzlen, Camille
Bouché, Pierre Alban
Pujol, Nicolas
author_facet Sigonney, François
Steltzlen, Camille
Bouché, Pierre Alban
Pujol, Nicolas
author_sort Sigonney, François
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Internet, especially YouTube, is an important and growing source of medical information. The content of this information is poorly evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the quality of YouTube video content on meniscus repair. The hypothesis was that this source of information is not relevant for patients. METHODS: A YouTube search was carried out using the keywords "meniscus repair". Videos had to have had more than 10,000 views to be included. The videos were analyzed by two evaluators. Various features of the videos were recorded (number of views, date of publication, "likes", "don’t likes", number of comments, source, type of content and the origin of the video). The quality of the video content was analyzed by two validated information system scores: the JAMA benchmark score (0 to 4) and the Modified DISCERN score (0 to 5). A specific meniscus repair score (MRSS scored out of 22) was developed for this study, in the same way that a specific score has been developed for other similar studies (anterior cruciate ligament, spine, etc.). RESULTS: Forty-four (44) videos were included in the study. The average number of views per video was 180,100 (± 222,000) for a total number of views of 7,924,095. The majority of the videos were from North America (90.9%). In most cases, the source (uploader) that published the video was a doctor (59.1%). A manufacturer, an institution and a non-medical source were the other sources. The content actually contained information on meniscus repair in only 50% of the cases. The mean scores for the JAMA benchmark, MD score and MRSS were 1.6/4± 0.75, 1.2/5 ± 1.02 and 4.5/22 (± 4.01) respectively. No correlation was found between the number of views and the quality of the videos. The quality of videos from medical sources was not superior to those from other sources. CONCLUSION: The content of YouTube videos on meniscus repair is of very low quality. Physicians should inform patients and, more importantly, contribute to the improvement of these contents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7917866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79178662021-03-11 A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery Sigonney, François Steltzlen, Camille Bouché, Pierre Alban Pujol, Nicolas Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The Internet, especially YouTube, is an important and growing source of medical information. The content of this information is poorly evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the quality of YouTube video content on meniscus repair. The hypothesis was that this source of information is not relevant for patients. METHODS: A YouTube search was carried out using the keywords "meniscus repair". Videos had to have had more than 10,000 views to be included. The videos were analyzed by two evaluators. Various features of the videos were recorded (number of views, date of publication, "likes", "don’t likes", number of comments, source, type of content and the origin of the video). The quality of the video content was analyzed by two validated information system scores: the JAMA benchmark score (0 to 4) and the Modified DISCERN score (0 to 5). A specific meniscus repair score (MRSS scored out of 22) was developed for this study, in the same way that a specific score has been developed for other similar studies (anterior cruciate ligament, spine, etc.). RESULTS: Forty-four (44) videos were included in the study. The average number of views per video was 180,100 (± 222,000) for a total number of views of 7,924,095. The majority of the videos were from North America (90.9%). In most cases, the source (uploader) that published the video was a doctor (59.1%). A manufacturer, an institution and a non-medical source were the other sources. The content actually contained information on meniscus repair in only 50% of the cases. The mean scores for the JAMA benchmark, MD score and MRSS were 1.6/4± 0.75, 1.2/5 ± 1.02 and 4.5/22 (± 4.01) respectively. No correlation was found between the number of views and the quality of the videos. The quality of videos from medical sources was not superior to those from other sources. CONCLUSION: The content of YouTube videos on meniscus repair is of very low quality. Physicians should inform patients and, more importantly, contribute to the improvement of these contents. SAGE Publications 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7917866/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00013 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Sigonney, François
Steltzlen, Camille
Bouché, Pierre Alban
Pujol, Nicolas
A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery
title A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery
title_full A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery
title_fullStr A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery
title_full_unstemmed A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery
title_short A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery
title_sort quality analysis of the youtube video content on meniscus repair surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917866/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00013
work_keys_str_mv AT sigonneyfrancois aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery
AT steltzlencamille aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery
AT bouchepierrealban aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery
AT pujolnicolas aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery
AT sigonneyfrancois qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery
AT steltzlencamille qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery
AT bouchepierrealban qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery
AT pujolnicolas qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery