Cargando…
A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery
OBJECTIVES: The Internet, especially YouTube, is an important and growing source of medical information. The content of this information is poorly evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the quality of YouTube video content on meniscus repair. The hypothesis was that this source of inf...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917866/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00013 |
_version_ | 1783657796131094528 |
---|---|
author | Sigonney, François Steltzlen, Camille Bouché, Pierre Alban Pujol, Nicolas |
author_facet | Sigonney, François Steltzlen, Camille Bouché, Pierre Alban Pujol, Nicolas |
author_sort | Sigonney, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Internet, especially YouTube, is an important and growing source of medical information. The content of this information is poorly evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the quality of YouTube video content on meniscus repair. The hypothesis was that this source of information is not relevant for patients. METHODS: A YouTube search was carried out using the keywords "meniscus repair". Videos had to have had more than 10,000 views to be included. The videos were analyzed by two evaluators. Various features of the videos were recorded (number of views, date of publication, "likes", "don’t likes", number of comments, source, type of content and the origin of the video). The quality of the video content was analyzed by two validated information system scores: the JAMA benchmark score (0 to 4) and the Modified DISCERN score (0 to 5). A specific meniscus repair score (MRSS scored out of 22) was developed for this study, in the same way that a specific score has been developed for other similar studies (anterior cruciate ligament, spine, etc.). RESULTS: Forty-four (44) videos were included in the study. The average number of views per video was 180,100 (± 222,000) for a total number of views of 7,924,095. The majority of the videos were from North America (90.9%). In most cases, the source (uploader) that published the video was a doctor (59.1%). A manufacturer, an institution and a non-medical source were the other sources. The content actually contained information on meniscus repair in only 50% of the cases. The mean scores for the JAMA benchmark, MD score and MRSS were 1.6/4± 0.75, 1.2/5 ± 1.02 and 4.5/22 (± 4.01) respectively. No correlation was found between the number of views and the quality of the videos. The quality of videos from medical sources was not superior to those from other sources. CONCLUSION: The content of YouTube videos on meniscus repair is of very low quality. Physicians should inform patients and, more importantly, contribute to the improvement of these contents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7917866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79178662021-03-11 A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery Sigonney, François Steltzlen, Camille Bouché, Pierre Alban Pujol, Nicolas Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The Internet, especially YouTube, is an important and growing source of medical information. The content of this information is poorly evaluated. The objective of this study was to analyze the quality of YouTube video content on meniscus repair. The hypothesis was that this source of information is not relevant for patients. METHODS: A YouTube search was carried out using the keywords "meniscus repair". Videos had to have had more than 10,000 views to be included. The videos were analyzed by two evaluators. Various features of the videos were recorded (number of views, date of publication, "likes", "don’t likes", number of comments, source, type of content and the origin of the video). The quality of the video content was analyzed by two validated information system scores: the JAMA benchmark score (0 to 4) and the Modified DISCERN score (0 to 5). A specific meniscus repair score (MRSS scored out of 22) was developed for this study, in the same way that a specific score has been developed for other similar studies (anterior cruciate ligament, spine, etc.). RESULTS: Forty-four (44) videos were included in the study. The average number of views per video was 180,100 (± 222,000) for a total number of views of 7,924,095. The majority of the videos were from North America (90.9%). In most cases, the source (uploader) that published the video was a doctor (59.1%). A manufacturer, an institution and a non-medical source were the other sources. The content actually contained information on meniscus repair in only 50% of the cases. The mean scores for the JAMA benchmark, MD score and MRSS were 1.6/4± 0.75, 1.2/5 ± 1.02 and 4.5/22 (± 4.01) respectively. No correlation was found between the number of views and the quality of the videos. The quality of videos from medical sources was not superior to those from other sources. CONCLUSION: The content of YouTube videos on meniscus repair is of very low quality. Physicians should inform patients and, more importantly, contribute to the improvement of these contents. SAGE Publications 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7917866/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00013 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions. |
spellingShingle | Article Sigonney, François Steltzlen, Camille Bouché, Pierre Alban Pujol, Nicolas A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair surgery |
title | A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair
surgery |
title_full | A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair
surgery |
title_fullStr | A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair
surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair
surgery |
title_short | A quality analysis of the YouTube video content on meniscus repair
surgery |
title_sort | quality analysis of the youtube video content on meniscus repair
surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7917866/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sigonneyfrancois aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery AT steltzlencamille aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery AT bouchepierrealban aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery AT pujolnicolas aqualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery AT sigonneyfrancois qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery AT steltzlencamille qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery AT bouchepierrealban qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery AT pujolnicolas qualityanalysisoftheyoutubevideocontentonmeniscusrepairsurgery |