Cargando…
A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells
Recent polymer and metal additive manufacturing technologies were proven capable of building complex structures with high accuracy. Although their final products differ significantly in terms of mechanical properties and building cost, many structural optimization studies were performed with either...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040883 |
_version_ | 1783657886383079424 |
---|---|
author | Laban, Othman Mahdi, Elsadig Samim, Samahat Cabibihan, John-John |
author_facet | Laban, Othman Mahdi, Elsadig Samim, Samahat Cabibihan, John-John |
author_sort | Laban, Othman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent polymer and metal additive manufacturing technologies were proven capable of building complex structures with high accuracy. Although their final products differ significantly in terms of mechanical properties and building cost, many structural optimization studies were performed with either one without systematic justification. Therefore, this study investigated whether the Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) and Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) methodologies can provide similar conclusions when performing geometrical manipulations for optimizing structural crashworthiness. Two identical sets of four shapes of stiffened hexagonal cells were built and crushed under quasi-static loading. The results were compared in terms of collapsing behavior, load-carrying performance, and energy-absorption capability. Although the observed failure modes were different since the base-materials differ, similar improvement trends in performance were observed between both fabrication approaches. Therefore, FDM was recommended as a fabrication method to optimize thin-walled cellular hexagonal parameters since it was 80% more time-efficient and 53.6% cheaper than the DMLS technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7918263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79182632021-03-02 A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells Laban, Othman Mahdi, Elsadig Samim, Samahat Cabibihan, John-John Materials (Basel) Article Recent polymer and metal additive manufacturing technologies were proven capable of building complex structures with high accuracy. Although their final products differ significantly in terms of mechanical properties and building cost, many structural optimization studies were performed with either one without systematic justification. Therefore, this study investigated whether the Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) and Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) methodologies can provide similar conclusions when performing geometrical manipulations for optimizing structural crashworthiness. Two identical sets of four shapes of stiffened hexagonal cells were built and crushed under quasi-static loading. The results were compared in terms of collapsing behavior, load-carrying performance, and energy-absorption capability. Although the observed failure modes were different since the base-materials differ, similar improvement trends in performance were observed between both fabrication approaches. Therefore, FDM was recommended as a fabrication method to optimize thin-walled cellular hexagonal parameters since it was 80% more time-efficient and 53.6% cheaper than the DMLS technique. MDPI 2021-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7918263/ /pubmed/33673333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040883 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Laban, Othman Mahdi, Elsadig Samim, Samahat Cabibihan, John-John A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells |
title | A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells |
title_full | A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells |
title_short | A Comparative Study between Polymer and Metal Additive Manufacturing Approaches in Investigating Stiffened Hexagonal Cells |
title_sort | comparative study between polymer and metal additive manufacturing approaches in investigating stiffened hexagonal cells |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14040883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT labanothman acomparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells AT mahdielsadig acomparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells AT samimsamahat acomparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells AT cabibihanjohnjohn acomparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells AT labanothman comparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells AT mahdielsadig comparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells AT samimsamahat comparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells AT cabibihanjohnjohn comparativestudybetweenpolymerandmetaladditivemanufacturingapproachesininvestigatingstiffenedhexagonalcells |