Cargando…

Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the retention rate, efficacy, safety, and dosing of perampanel administered to patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care in the retrospective phase IV, PROVE Study (NCT03208660). METHODS: Exposure, efficacy, and safety data were obtained from the medical records of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheless, James, Wechsler, Robert T., Lancman, Marcelo, Aboumatar, Sami, Patten, Anna, Malhotra, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12445
_version_ 1783657897934192640
author Wheless, James
Wechsler, Robert T.
Lancman, Marcelo
Aboumatar, Sami
Patten, Anna
Malhotra, Manoj
author_facet Wheless, James
Wechsler, Robert T.
Lancman, Marcelo
Aboumatar, Sami
Patten, Anna
Malhotra, Manoj
author_sort Wheless, James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the retention rate, efficacy, safety, and dosing of perampanel administered to patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care in the retrospective phase IV, PROVE Study (NCT03208660). METHODS: Exposure, efficacy, and safety data were obtained from the medical records of patients initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, across 29 US study sites. The cutoff date for this interim analysis was October 10, 2018. The primary efficacy endpoint was retention rate. Secondary efficacy endpoints included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure‐freedom rate, and overall investigator impression of seizure effect. RESULTS: All enrolled patients (N = 1121) received perampanel. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) cumulative duration of exposure to perampanel was 16.6 (14.7) months; overall mean (SD) daily perampanel dose was 5.7 (2.7) mg. Perampanel uptitration occurred weekly (21.1%), biweekly (23.8%), every 3 weeks (1.5%), other (43.3%), and unknown (10.3%). Across the Safety Analysis Set (N = 1121), retention rate on perampanel at 24 months was 49.5% (n = 319/645). At 12 months, the median reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline in the small number of patients for whom data were available was 75.0% (n = 85), and 30/85 (35.3%) patients were seizure free. Based on investigator impression at the end of treatment, improvement, no change (ie, stable), or worsening of seizures was reported in 54.3%, 33.7%, and 12.0% of patients, respectively. Treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 500 (44.6%) patients; the most common were dizziness (9.2%), aggression (5.4%), and irritability (4.5%). Serious treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 32 (2.9%) patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Favorable retention and sustained efficacy were demonstrated for ≥12 months following initiation of perampanel during routine clinical care in patients with epilepsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7918328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79183282021-03-05 Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study Wheless, James Wechsler, Robert T. Lancman, Marcelo Aboumatar, Sami Patten, Anna Malhotra, Manoj Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the retention rate, efficacy, safety, and dosing of perampanel administered to patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care in the retrospective phase IV, PROVE Study (NCT03208660). METHODS: Exposure, efficacy, and safety data were obtained from the medical records of patients initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, across 29 US study sites. The cutoff date for this interim analysis was October 10, 2018. The primary efficacy endpoint was retention rate. Secondary efficacy endpoints included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure‐freedom rate, and overall investigator impression of seizure effect. RESULTS: All enrolled patients (N = 1121) received perampanel. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) cumulative duration of exposure to perampanel was 16.6 (14.7) months; overall mean (SD) daily perampanel dose was 5.7 (2.7) mg. Perampanel uptitration occurred weekly (21.1%), biweekly (23.8%), every 3 weeks (1.5%), other (43.3%), and unknown (10.3%). Across the Safety Analysis Set (N = 1121), retention rate on perampanel at 24 months was 49.5% (n = 319/645). At 12 months, the median reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline in the small number of patients for whom data were available was 75.0% (n = 85), and 30/85 (35.3%) patients were seizure free. Based on investigator impression at the end of treatment, improvement, no change (ie, stable), or worsening of seizures was reported in 54.3%, 33.7%, and 12.0% of patients, respectively. Treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 500 (44.6%) patients; the most common were dizziness (9.2%), aggression (5.4%), and irritability (4.5%). Serious treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 32 (2.9%) patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Favorable retention and sustained efficacy were demonstrated for ≥12 months following initiation of perampanel during routine clinical care in patients with epilepsy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7918328/ /pubmed/33681651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12445 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Wheless, James
Wechsler, Robert T.
Lancman, Marcelo
Aboumatar, Sami
Patten, Anna
Malhotra, Manoj
Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study
title Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study
title_full Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study
title_fullStr Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study
title_full_unstemmed Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study
title_short Perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study
title_sort perampanel in real‐world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: interim analysis of a phase iv study
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12445
work_keys_str_mv AT whelessjames perampanelinrealworldclinicalcareofpatientswithepilepsyinterimanalysisofaphaseivstudy
AT wechslerrobertt perampanelinrealworldclinicalcareofpatientswithepilepsyinterimanalysisofaphaseivstudy
AT lancmanmarcelo perampanelinrealworldclinicalcareofpatientswithepilepsyinterimanalysisofaphaseivstudy
AT aboumatarsami perampanelinrealworldclinicalcareofpatientswithepilepsyinterimanalysisofaphaseivstudy
AT pattenanna perampanelinrealworldclinicalcareofpatientswithepilepsyinterimanalysisofaphaseivstudy
AT malhotramanoj perampanelinrealworldclinicalcareofpatientswithepilepsyinterimanalysisofaphaseivstudy