Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India
OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS) in India. METHODS: Centers in India were iden...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12448 |
_version_ | 1783657898676584448 |
---|---|
author | Mehndiratta, Man M. Gulhane, Manoj Jabeen, Shaik A. Patten, Anna Dash, Amitabh Malhotra, Manoj |
author_facet | Mehndiratta, Man M. Gulhane, Manoj Jabeen, Shaik A. Patten, Anna Dash, Amitabh Malhotra, Manoj |
author_sort | Mehndiratta, Man M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS) in India. METHODS: Centers in India were identified from six double‐blind, randomized, Phase II and Phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (2–12 mg/day) and their open‐label extensions (OLEx). Efficacy assessments included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days, 50% and 75% responder and seizure‐freedom rates. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Overall, 128 patients (placebo, n = 39; perampanel, n = 89) were included in the double‐blind Safety Analysis Set and 126 (FS, n = 113 [placebo, n = 32; perampanel, n = 81]; FBTCS, n = 35 [placebo, n = 14; perampanel, n = 21]; GTCS, n = 13 [placebo, n = 6; perampanel, n = 7]) comprised the Full Analysis Set. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for placebo vs perampanel for Indian patients were as follows: 34.8% vs 49.8% (FS; not significant [NS]) and 43.1% vs 60.5% (FBTCS; NS) at 4–12 mg/day, respectively, and −22.4% vs 8.2% (GTCS; NS) at 8 mg/day, respectively. Fifty‐percent responder rates were 37.5% vs 55.1% (FS; NS), 42.9% vs 60.0% (FBTCS; NS), and 16.7% vs 42.9% (GTCS; NS), respectively; seizure‐freedom rates were 0.0% vs 5.8%, 7.1% vs 10.0%, and 0.0% vs 14.3%, respectively (all NS). Overall, 110 patients entered OLEx studies (FS, n = 99; GTCS, n = 11). Perampanel was efficacious for up to four years for FS and FBTCS and two years for GTCS. Across double‐blind and OLEx studies, TEAEs occurred in 58.4% and 83.6% of Indian perampanel‐treated patients, respectively; dizziness was most common. Efficacy and safety outcomes were generally similar overall between Indian and non‐Indian patients. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest adjunctive perampanel (up to 12 mg/day) may be a suitable anti‐seizure medication for patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with FS, with/without FBTCS, or GTCS in India. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7918331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79183312021-03-05 Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India Mehndiratta, Man M. Gulhane, Manoj Jabeen, Shaik A. Patten, Anna Dash, Amitabh Malhotra, Manoj Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS) in India. METHODS: Centers in India were identified from six double‐blind, randomized, Phase II and Phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (2–12 mg/day) and their open‐label extensions (OLEx). Efficacy assessments included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days, 50% and 75% responder and seizure‐freedom rates. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Overall, 128 patients (placebo, n = 39; perampanel, n = 89) were included in the double‐blind Safety Analysis Set and 126 (FS, n = 113 [placebo, n = 32; perampanel, n = 81]; FBTCS, n = 35 [placebo, n = 14; perampanel, n = 21]; GTCS, n = 13 [placebo, n = 6; perampanel, n = 7]) comprised the Full Analysis Set. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for placebo vs perampanel for Indian patients were as follows: 34.8% vs 49.8% (FS; not significant [NS]) and 43.1% vs 60.5% (FBTCS; NS) at 4–12 mg/day, respectively, and −22.4% vs 8.2% (GTCS; NS) at 8 mg/day, respectively. Fifty‐percent responder rates were 37.5% vs 55.1% (FS; NS), 42.9% vs 60.0% (FBTCS; NS), and 16.7% vs 42.9% (GTCS; NS), respectively; seizure‐freedom rates were 0.0% vs 5.8%, 7.1% vs 10.0%, and 0.0% vs 14.3%, respectively (all NS). Overall, 110 patients entered OLEx studies (FS, n = 99; GTCS, n = 11). Perampanel was efficacious for up to four years for FS and FBTCS and two years for GTCS. Across double‐blind and OLEx studies, TEAEs occurred in 58.4% and 83.6% of Indian perampanel‐treated patients, respectively; dizziness was most common. Efficacy and safety outcomes were generally similar overall between Indian and non‐Indian patients. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest adjunctive perampanel (up to 12 mg/day) may be a suitable anti‐seizure medication for patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with FS, with/without FBTCS, or GTCS in India. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7918331/ /pubmed/33681652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12448 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full‐length Original Research Mehndiratta, Man M. Gulhane, Manoj Jabeen, Shaik A. Patten, Anna Dash, Amitabh Malhotra, Manoj Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India |
title | Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: post hoc analysis of phase ii and phase iii double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in india |
topic | Full‐length Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehndirattamanm efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia AT gulhanemanoj efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia AT jabeenshaika efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia AT pattenanna efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia AT dashamitabh efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia AT malhotramanoj efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia |