Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India

OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS) in India. METHODS: Centers in India were iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehndiratta, Man M., Gulhane, Manoj, Jabeen, Shaik A., Patten, Anna, Dash, Amitabh, Malhotra, Manoj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12448
_version_ 1783657898676584448
author Mehndiratta, Man M.
Gulhane, Manoj
Jabeen, Shaik A.
Patten, Anna
Dash, Amitabh
Malhotra, Manoj
author_facet Mehndiratta, Man M.
Gulhane, Manoj
Jabeen, Shaik A.
Patten, Anna
Dash, Amitabh
Malhotra, Manoj
author_sort Mehndiratta, Man M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS) in India. METHODS: Centers in India were identified from six double‐blind, randomized, Phase II and Phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (2–12 mg/day) and their open‐label extensions (OLEx). Efficacy assessments included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days, 50% and 75% responder and seizure‐freedom rates. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Overall, 128 patients (placebo, n = 39; perampanel, n = 89) were included in the double‐blind Safety Analysis Set and 126 (FS, n = 113 [placebo, n = 32; perampanel, n = 81]; FBTCS, n = 35 [placebo, n = 14; perampanel, n = 21]; GTCS, n = 13 [placebo, n = 6; perampanel, n = 7]) comprised the Full Analysis Set. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for placebo vs perampanel for Indian patients were as follows: 34.8% vs 49.8% (FS; not significant [NS]) and 43.1% vs 60.5% (FBTCS; NS) at 4–12 mg/day, respectively, and −22.4% vs 8.2% (GTCS; NS) at 8 mg/day, respectively. Fifty‐percent responder rates were 37.5% vs 55.1% (FS; NS), 42.9% vs 60.0% (FBTCS; NS), and 16.7% vs 42.9% (GTCS; NS), respectively; seizure‐freedom rates were 0.0% vs 5.8%, 7.1% vs 10.0%, and 0.0% vs 14.3%, respectively (all NS). Overall, 110 patients entered OLEx studies (FS, n = 99; GTCS, n = 11). Perampanel was efficacious for up to four years for FS and FBTCS and two years for GTCS. Across double‐blind and OLEx studies, TEAEs occurred in 58.4% and 83.6% of Indian perampanel‐treated patients, respectively; dizziness was most common. Efficacy and safety outcomes were generally similar overall between Indian and non‐Indian patients. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest adjunctive perampanel (up to 12 mg/day) may be a suitable anti‐seizure medication for patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with FS, with/without FBTCS, or GTCS in India.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7918331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79183312021-03-05 Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India Mehndiratta, Man M. Gulhane, Manoj Jabeen, Shaik A. Patten, Anna Dash, Amitabh Malhotra, Manoj Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic‐clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures (GTCS) in India. METHODS: Centers in India were identified from six double‐blind, randomized, Phase II and Phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (2–12 mg/day) and their open‐label extensions (OLEx). Efficacy assessments included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days, 50% and 75% responder and seizure‐freedom rates. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Overall, 128 patients (placebo, n = 39; perampanel, n = 89) were included in the double‐blind Safety Analysis Set and 126 (FS, n = 113 [placebo, n = 32; perampanel, n = 81]; FBTCS, n = 35 [placebo, n = 14; perampanel, n = 21]; GTCS, n = 13 [placebo, n = 6; perampanel, n = 7]) comprised the Full Analysis Set. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for placebo vs perampanel for Indian patients were as follows: 34.8% vs 49.8% (FS; not significant [NS]) and 43.1% vs 60.5% (FBTCS; NS) at 4–12 mg/day, respectively, and −22.4% vs 8.2% (GTCS; NS) at 8 mg/day, respectively. Fifty‐percent responder rates were 37.5% vs 55.1% (FS; NS), 42.9% vs 60.0% (FBTCS; NS), and 16.7% vs 42.9% (GTCS; NS), respectively; seizure‐freedom rates were 0.0% vs 5.8%, 7.1% vs 10.0%, and 0.0% vs 14.3%, respectively (all NS). Overall, 110 patients entered OLEx studies (FS, n = 99; GTCS, n = 11). Perampanel was efficacious for up to four years for FS and FBTCS and two years for GTCS. Across double‐blind and OLEx studies, TEAEs occurred in 58.4% and 83.6% of Indian perampanel‐treated patients, respectively; dizziness was most common. Efficacy and safety outcomes were generally similar overall between Indian and non‐Indian patients. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest adjunctive perampanel (up to 12 mg/day) may be a suitable anti‐seizure medication for patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with FS, with/without FBTCS, or GTCS in India. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7918331/ /pubmed/33681652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12448 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Mehndiratta, Man M.
Gulhane, Manoj
Jabeen, Shaik A.
Patten, Anna
Dash, Amitabh
Malhotra, Manoj
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India
title Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India
title_full Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India
title_short Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of Phase II and Phase III double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in India
title_sort efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal seizures or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures: post hoc analysis of phase ii and phase iii double‐blind and open‐label extension studies in india
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33681652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12448
work_keys_str_mv AT mehndirattamanm efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia
AT gulhanemanoj efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia
AT jabeenshaika efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia
AT pattenanna efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia
AT dashamitabh efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia
AT malhotramanoj efficacyandsafetyofadjunctiveperampanelinpatientswithfocalseizuresorgeneralizedtonicclonicseizuresposthocanalysisofphaseiiandphaseiiidoubleblindandopenlabelextensionstudiesinindia