Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT

Plantar heel pain is a common cause of foot pain that affects patients’ quality of life and represents a significant cost for the healthcare system. Dry needling and percutaneous needle electrolysis are two minimally invasive treatments that were shown to be effective for the management of plantar h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández, Daniel, Al-Boloushi, Zaid, Bellosta-López, Pablo, Herrero, Pablo, Gómez, Manuel, Calvo, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041777
_version_ 1783657957821513728
author Fernández, Daniel
Al-Boloushi, Zaid
Bellosta-López, Pablo
Herrero, Pablo
Gómez, Manuel
Calvo, Sandra
author_facet Fernández, Daniel
Al-Boloushi, Zaid
Bellosta-López, Pablo
Herrero, Pablo
Gómez, Manuel
Calvo, Sandra
author_sort Fernández, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Plantar heel pain is a common cause of foot pain that affects patients’ quality of life and represents a significant cost for the healthcare system. Dry needling and percutaneous needle electrolysis are two minimally invasive treatments that were shown to be effective for the management of plantar heel pain. The aim of our study was to compare these two treatments in terms of health and economic consequences based on the results of a published randomized controlled trial. For this, we evaluated the costs from the point of view of the hospital and we carried out a cost-effectiveness study using quality of life as the main variable according to the Eq-5D-5L questionnaire. The cost of the complete treatment with dry needling (DN) was €178.86, while the percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) was €200.90. The quality of life of patients improved and was translated into +0.615 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for DN and +0.669 for PNE. PNE presented an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €411.34/QALY against DN. These results indicate that PNE had a better cost-effectiveness ratio for the treatment of plantar heel pain than DN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7918589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79185892021-03-02 Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT Fernández, Daniel Al-Boloushi, Zaid Bellosta-López, Pablo Herrero, Pablo Gómez, Manuel Calvo, Sandra Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Plantar heel pain is a common cause of foot pain that affects patients’ quality of life and represents a significant cost for the healthcare system. Dry needling and percutaneous needle electrolysis are two minimally invasive treatments that were shown to be effective for the management of plantar heel pain. The aim of our study was to compare these two treatments in terms of health and economic consequences based on the results of a published randomized controlled trial. For this, we evaluated the costs from the point of view of the hospital and we carried out a cost-effectiveness study using quality of life as the main variable according to the Eq-5D-5L questionnaire. The cost of the complete treatment with dry needling (DN) was €178.86, while the percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) was €200.90. The quality of life of patients improved and was translated into +0.615 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for DN and +0.669 for PNE. PNE presented an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €411.34/QALY against DN. These results indicate that PNE had a better cost-effectiveness ratio for the treatment of plantar heel pain than DN. MDPI 2021-02-12 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7918589/ /pubmed/33673068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041777 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fernández, Daniel
Al-Boloushi, Zaid
Bellosta-López, Pablo
Herrero, Pablo
Gómez, Manuel
Calvo, Sandra
Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT
title Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT
title_sort cost-effectiveness of two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a secondary analysis of an rct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041777
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezdaniel costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct
AT alboloushizaid costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct
AT bellostalopezpablo costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct
AT herreropablo costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct
AT gomezmanuel costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct
AT calvosandra costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct