Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT
Plantar heel pain is a common cause of foot pain that affects patients’ quality of life and represents a significant cost for the healthcare system. Dry needling and percutaneous needle electrolysis are two minimally invasive treatments that were shown to be effective for the management of plantar h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041777 |
_version_ | 1783657957821513728 |
---|---|
author | Fernández, Daniel Al-Boloushi, Zaid Bellosta-López, Pablo Herrero, Pablo Gómez, Manuel Calvo, Sandra |
author_facet | Fernández, Daniel Al-Boloushi, Zaid Bellosta-López, Pablo Herrero, Pablo Gómez, Manuel Calvo, Sandra |
author_sort | Fernández, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plantar heel pain is a common cause of foot pain that affects patients’ quality of life and represents a significant cost for the healthcare system. Dry needling and percutaneous needle electrolysis are two minimally invasive treatments that were shown to be effective for the management of plantar heel pain. The aim of our study was to compare these two treatments in terms of health and economic consequences based on the results of a published randomized controlled trial. For this, we evaluated the costs from the point of view of the hospital and we carried out a cost-effectiveness study using quality of life as the main variable according to the Eq-5D-5L questionnaire. The cost of the complete treatment with dry needling (DN) was €178.86, while the percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) was €200.90. The quality of life of patients improved and was translated into +0.615 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for DN and +0.669 for PNE. PNE presented an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €411.34/QALY against DN. These results indicate that PNE had a better cost-effectiveness ratio for the treatment of plantar heel pain than DN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7918589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79185892021-03-02 Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT Fernández, Daniel Al-Boloushi, Zaid Bellosta-López, Pablo Herrero, Pablo Gómez, Manuel Calvo, Sandra Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Plantar heel pain is a common cause of foot pain that affects patients’ quality of life and represents a significant cost for the healthcare system. Dry needling and percutaneous needle electrolysis are two minimally invasive treatments that were shown to be effective for the management of plantar heel pain. The aim of our study was to compare these two treatments in terms of health and economic consequences based on the results of a published randomized controlled trial. For this, we evaluated the costs from the point of view of the hospital and we carried out a cost-effectiveness study using quality of life as the main variable according to the Eq-5D-5L questionnaire. The cost of the complete treatment with dry needling (DN) was €178.86, while the percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE) was €200.90. The quality of life of patients improved and was translated into +0.615 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for DN and +0.669 for PNE. PNE presented an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €411.34/QALY against DN. These results indicate that PNE had a better cost-effectiveness ratio for the treatment of plantar heel pain than DN. MDPI 2021-02-12 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7918589/ /pubmed/33673068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041777 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fernández, Daniel Al-Boloushi, Zaid Bellosta-López, Pablo Herrero, Pablo Gómez, Manuel Calvo, Sandra Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT |
title | Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness of Two Dry Needling Interventions for Plantar Heel Pain: A Secondary Analysis of an RCT |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a secondary analysis of an rct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33673068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezdaniel costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct AT alboloushizaid costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct AT bellostalopezpablo costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct AT herreropablo costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct AT gomezmanuel costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct AT calvosandra costeffectivenessoftwodryneedlinginterventionsforplantarheelpainasecondaryanalysisofanrct |