Cargando…

Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival

Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and Dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatzis, Georgios, Syntila, Styliani, Markus, Birgit, Ahrens, Holger, Patsalis, Nikolaos, Luesebrink, Ulrich, Divchev, Dimitar, Parahuleva, Mariana, Al Eryani, Hanna, Schieffer, Bernhard, Karatolios, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040747
_version_ 1783657967276523520
author Chatzis, Georgios
Syntila, Styliani
Markus, Birgit
Ahrens, Holger
Patsalis, Nikolaos
Luesebrink, Ulrich
Divchev, Dimitar
Parahuleva, Mariana
Al Eryani, Hanna
Schieffer, Bernhard
Karatolios, Konstantinos
author_facet Chatzis, Georgios
Syntila, Styliani
Markus, Birgit
Ahrens, Holger
Patsalis, Nikolaos
Luesebrink, Ulrich
Divchev, Dimitar
Parahuleva, Mariana
Al Eryani, Hanna
Schieffer, Bernhard
Karatolios, Konstantinos
author_sort Chatzis, Georgios
collection PubMed
description Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and December 2019 and evaluated the risk factors of mortality in this setting. Mean age was 61.07 ± 10.7 and 54 (80.6%) patients were male. Main cause of RCS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (74.6%), while 44 (65.7%) were resuscitated prior to admission. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on admission was 73.54 ± 16.03 and 12.25 ± 2.71, respectively, corresponding to an expected mortality of higher than 80%. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support (p < 0.05 for both). Overall, 17 (25.4%) patients were discharged to cardiac rehabilitation and 5 patients (7.5%) were bridged successfully to ventricular assist device implantation, leading to a total of 32.8% survival on hospital discharge. The 6-month survival was 31.3%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, vasoactive score > 100 and pH < 7.26 on initiation of biventricular support, as well as Charlson comorbity index > 3 and prior resuscitation were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, biventricular support with Impella and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and efficient leading to a better survival than predicted through traditional risk scores, mainly via significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction in lactate levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7918629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79186292021-03-02 Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival Chatzis, Georgios Syntila, Styliani Markus, Birgit Ahrens, Holger Patsalis, Nikolaos Luesebrink, Ulrich Divchev, Dimitar Parahuleva, Mariana Al Eryani, Hanna Schieffer, Bernhard Karatolios, Konstantinos J Clin Med Article Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and December 2019 and evaluated the risk factors of mortality in this setting. Mean age was 61.07 ± 10.7 and 54 (80.6%) patients were male. Main cause of RCS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (74.6%), while 44 (65.7%) were resuscitated prior to admission. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on admission was 73.54 ± 16.03 and 12.25 ± 2.71, respectively, corresponding to an expected mortality of higher than 80%. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support (p < 0.05 for both). Overall, 17 (25.4%) patients were discharged to cardiac rehabilitation and 5 patients (7.5%) were bridged successfully to ventricular assist device implantation, leading to a total of 32.8% survival on hospital discharge. The 6-month survival was 31.3%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, vasoactive score > 100 and pH < 7.26 on initiation of biventricular support, as well as Charlson comorbity index > 3 and prior resuscitation were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, biventricular support with Impella and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and efficient leading to a better survival than predicted through traditional risk scores, mainly via significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction in lactate levels. MDPI 2021-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7918629/ /pubmed/33668590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040747 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chatzis, Georgios
Syntila, Styliani
Markus, Birgit
Ahrens, Holger
Patsalis, Nikolaos
Luesebrink, Ulrich
Divchev, Dimitar
Parahuleva, Mariana
Al Eryani, Hanna
Schieffer, Bernhard
Karatolios, Konstantinos
Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival
title Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival
title_full Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival
title_fullStr Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival
title_full_unstemmed Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival
title_short Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival
title_sort biventricular unloading with impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe refractory cardiogenic shock: implications from the combined use of the devices and prognostic risk factors of survival
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040747
work_keys_str_mv AT chatzisgeorgios biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT syntilastyliani biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT markusbirgit biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT ahrensholger biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT patsalisnikolaos biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT luesebrinkulrich biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT divchevdimitar biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT parahulevamariana biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT aleryanihanna biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT schiefferbernhard biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival
AT karatolioskonstantinos biventricularunloadingwithimpellaandvenoarterialextracorporealmembraneoxygenationinsevererefractorycardiogenicshockimplicationsfromthecombineduseofthedevicesandprognosticriskfactorsofsurvival