Cargando…

Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China

The small size of microplastics and their wide distribution in water environments have attracted worldwide attention and heated discussion, because of their ingestion by aquatic organisms. At present, there are few studies on microplastics pollution in freshwater aquaculture ponds, especially shrimp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yizheng, Chen, Guanglong, Xu, Kaihang, Huang, Kai, Wang, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041869
_version_ 1783657984326369280
author Li, Yizheng
Chen, Guanglong
Xu, Kaihang
Huang, Kai
Wang, Jun
author_facet Li, Yizheng
Chen, Guanglong
Xu, Kaihang
Huang, Kai
Wang, Jun
author_sort Li, Yizheng
collection PubMed
description The small size of microplastics and their wide distribution in water environments have attracted worldwide attention and heated discussion, because of their ingestion by aquatic organisms. At present, there are few studies on microplastics pollution in freshwater aquaculture ponds, especially shrimp ponds. In this study, the aquaculture ponds in the Pearl River Estuary were investigated. The abundance and composition of microplastics in different environmental media were studied to explore the potential sources and risk levels of microplastics, so as to provide basic data for the study of microplastics pollution in aquaculture ponds. Microplastics were observed in water and sediment samples at all sampling sites, with the abundance of 6.6 × 10(3)–263.6 × 10(3) items/m(3) (surface water) and 566.67–2500 items/kg (sediment), respectively. Thirty-seven individuals collected in six ponds belong to four species. Microplastics were observed in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of all fishes and shrimps, with the abundance ranging from 3–92 items/individual (fish) and 4–21 items/individual (shrimp). Among all samples, microplastics with the size range of <1 mm and fiber shape were the most common. The main microplastic components were cellulose, polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene (PE). The results of potential risk assessment showed that the pollution investigation of microplastics should not only consider the abundance. Low abundance does not mean low risk. Taking the toxicity score and abundance of microplastics as evaluation indexes to reflect the pollution status of microplastics may make the results more reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7918702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79187022021-03-02 Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China Li, Yizheng Chen, Guanglong Xu, Kaihang Huang, Kai Wang, Jun Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The small size of microplastics and their wide distribution in water environments have attracted worldwide attention and heated discussion, because of their ingestion by aquatic organisms. At present, there are few studies on microplastics pollution in freshwater aquaculture ponds, especially shrimp ponds. In this study, the aquaculture ponds in the Pearl River Estuary were investigated. The abundance and composition of microplastics in different environmental media were studied to explore the potential sources and risk levels of microplastics, so as to provide basic data for the study of microplastics pollution in aquaculture ponds. Microplastics were observed in water and sediment samples at all sampling sites, with the abundance of 6.6 × 10(3)–263.6 × 10(3) items/m(3) (surface water) and 566.67–2500 items/kg (sediment), respectively. Thirty-seven individuals collected in six ponds belong to four species. Microplastics were observed in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of all fishes and shrimps, with the abundance ranging from 3–92 items/individual (fish) and 4–21 items/individual (shrimp). Among all samples, microplastics with the size range of <1 mm and fiber shape were the most common. The main microplastic components were cellulose, polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene (PE). The results of potential risk assessment showed that the pollution investigation of microplastics should not only consider the abundance. Low abundance does not mean low risk. Taking the toxicity score and abundance of microplastics as evaluation indexes to reflect the pollution status of microplastics may make the results more reliable. MDPI 2021-02-15 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7918702/ /pubmed/33671868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041869 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Yizheng
Chen, Guanglong
Xu, Kaihang
Huang, Kai
Wang, Jun
Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China
title Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China
title_full Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China
title_fullStr Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China
title_full_unstemmed Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China
title_short Microplastics Environmental Effect and Risk Assessment on the Aquaculture Systems from South China
title_sort microplastics environmental effect and risk assessment on the aquaculture systems from south china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041869
work_keys_str_mv AT liyizheng microplasticsenvironmentaleffectandriskassessmentontheaquaculturesystemsfromsouthchina
AT chenguanglong microplasticsenvironmentaleffectandriskassessmentontheaquaculturesystemsfromsouthchina
AT xukaihang microplasticsenvironmentaleffectandriskassessmentontheaquaculturesystemsfromsouthchina
AT huangkai microplasticsenvironmentaleffectandriskassessmentontheaquaculturesystemsfromsouthchina
AT wangjun microplasticsenvironmentaleffectandriskassessmentontheaquaculturesystemsfromsouthchina