Cargando…

In Vitro Co-Exposure to CeO(2) Nanomaterials from Diesel Engine Exhaust and Benzo(a)Pyrene Induces Additive DNA Damage in Sperm and Cumulus Cells but Not in Oocytes

Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) is a recognized reprotoxic compound and the most widely investigated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in ambient air; it is widespread by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels along with cerium dioxide nanomaterials (CeO(2) NMs), which are used in nano-based diesel additives...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cotena, Martina, Auffan, Mélanie, Tassistro, Virginie, Resseguier, Noémie, Rose, Jérôme, Perrin, Jeanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7918929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33668575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11020478
Descripción
Sumario:Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) is a recognized reprotoxic compound and the most widely investigated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in ambient air; it is widespread by the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels along with cerium dioxide nanomaterials (CeO(2) NMs), which are used in nano-based diesel additives to decrease the emission of toxic compounds and to increase fuel economy. The toxicity of CeO(2) NMs on reproductive organs and cells has also been shown. However, the effect of the combined interactions of BaP and CeO(2) NMs on reproduction has not been investigated. Herein, human and rat gametes were exposed in vitro to combusted CeO(2) NMs or BaP or CeO(2) NMs and BaP in combination. CeO(2) NMs were burned at 850 °C prior to mimicking their release after combustion in a diesel engine. We demonstrated significantly higher amounts of DNA damage after exposure to combusted CeO(2) NMs (1 µg·L(−1)) or BaP (1.13 µmol·L(−1)) in all cell types considered compared to unexposed cells. Co-exposure to the CeO(2) NMs-BaP mixture induced additive DNA damage in sperm and cumulus cells, whereas no additive effect was observed in rat oocytes. This result could be related to the structural protection of the oocyte by cumulus cells and to the oocyte’s efficient system to repair DNA damage compared to that of cumulus and sperm cells.