Cargando…

An optical coherence tomography comparison of coronary arterial plaque calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease and diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: Coronary arterial plaques in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are assumed to have increased calcification due to underlying renal disease or initiation of dialysis. This relationship may be confounded by comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: From a single-center OC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Joseph R, Martin, Brendan, Kassis, Nicholas, Shah, Kunal, Kovarnik, Tomas, Mattix-Kramer, Holly, Lopez, John J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7919205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32981349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479164120958425
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Coronary arterial plaques in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are assumed to have increased calcification due to underlying renal disease or initiation of dialysis. This relationship may be confounded by comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: From a single-center OCT registry, 60 patients were analyzed. Twenty patients with ESRD and diabetes (ESRD-DM) were compared to 2 groups of non-ESRD patients: 20 with and 20 without diabetes. In each patient, one 20 mm segment within the culprit vessel was analyzed. RESULTS: ESRD-DM patients exhibited similar calcium burden, arc, and area compared to patients with diabetes alone. When compared to patients without diabetes, patients with diabetes exhibited a greater summed area of calcium (DM: Median 9.0, IQR [5.3–28] mm(2) vs Non-DM: 3.5 [0.1–14] mm(2), p = 0.04) and larger calcium deposits by arc (DM: Mean 45 ± SE 6.2° vs Non-DM: 21 ± 6.2°, p = 0.01) and area (DM: 0.58 ± 0.10 mm(2) vs Non-DM: 0.26 ± 0.10 mm(2), p = 0.03). Calcification deposits in ESRD-DM patients (0.14 ± 0.02 mm) and patients with diabetes (0.14 ± 0.02 mm) were more superficially located relative to patients without diabetes (0.21 ± 0.02 mm), p = 0.01 for both. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary calcification in DM and ESRD-DM groups exhibited similar burden, deposit size, and depth within the arterial wall. The increase in coronary calcification and cardiovascular disease events seen in ESRD-DM patients may not be secondary to ESRD and dialysis, but instead due to a combination of declining renal function and diabetes.