Cargando…
Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study
BACKGROUND: The need to expand and better engage patients in primary care improvement persists. PURPOSE: Recognizing a continuum of forms of engagement, this study focused on identifying lessons for optimizing patient partnerships, wherein engagement is characterized by shared decision-making and pr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7919701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250 |
_version_ | 1783658175934758912 |
---|---|
author | Alidina, Shehnaz Martelli, Peter F. J. Singer, Sara Aveling, Emma-Louise |
author_facet | Alidina, Shehnaz Martelli, Peter F. J. Singer, Sara Aveling, Emma-Louise |
author_sort | Alidina, Shehnaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The need to expand and better engage patients in primary care improvement persists. PURPOSE: Recognizing a continuum of forms of engagement, this study focused on identifying lessons for optimizing patient partnerships, wherein engagement is characterized by shared decision-making and practice improvement codesign. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-three semistructured interviews with providers and patients involved in improvement efforts in seven U.S. primary care practices in the Academic Innovations Collaborative (AIC). The AIC aimed to implement primary care improvement, emphasizing patient engagement in the process. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Sites varied in their achievement of patient partnerships, encountering material, technical, and sociocultural obstacles. Time was a challenge for all sites, as was engaging a diversity of patients. Technical training on improvement processes and shared learning “on the job” were important. External, organizational, and individual-level resources helped overcome sociocultural challenges: The AIC drove provider buy-in, a team-based improvement approach helped shift relationships from providers and recipients toward teammates, and individual qualities and behaviors that flattened hierarchies and strengthened interpersonal relationships further enhanced “teamness.” A key factor influencing progress toward transformative partnerships was a strong shared learning journey, characterized by frequent interactions, proximity to improvement decision-making, and learning together from the “lived experience” of practice improvement. Teams came to value not only patients’ knowledge but also changes wrought by working collaboratively over time. CONCLUSION: Establishing practice improvement partnerships remains challenging, but partnering with patients on improvement journeys offers distinctive gains for high-quality patient-centered care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Engaging diverse patient partners requires significant disruption to organizational norms and routines, and the trend toward team-based primary care offers a fertile context for patient partnerships. Material, technical, and sociocultural resources should be evaluated not only for whether they overcome specific challenges but also for how they enhance the shared learning journey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7919701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79197012021-03-01 Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study Alidina, Shehnaz Martelli, Peter F. J. Singer, Sara Aveling, Emma-Louise Health Care Manage Rev Features BACKGROUND: The need to expand and better engage patients in primary care improvement persists. PURPOSE: Recognizing a continuum of forms of engagement, this study focused on identifying lessons for optimizing patient partnerships, wherein engagement is characterized by shared decision-making and practice improvement codesign. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-three semistructured interviews with providers and patients involved in improvement efforts in seven U.S. primary care practices in the Academic Innovations Collaborative (AIC). The AIC aimed to implement primary care improvement, emphasizing patient engagement in the process. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Sites varied in their achievement of patient partnerships, encountering material, technical, and sociocultural obstacles. Time was a challenge for all sites, as was engaging a diversity of patients. Technical training on improvement processes and shared learning “on the job” were important. External, organizational, and individual-level resources helped overcome sociocultural challenges: The AIC drove provider buy-in, a team-based improvement approach helped shift relationships from providers and recipients toward teammates, and individual qualities and behaviors that flattened hierarchies and strengthened interpersonal relationships further enhanced “teamness.” A key factor influencing progress toward transformative partnerships was a strong shared learning journey, characterized by frequent interactions, proximity to improvement decision-making, and learning together from the “lived experience” of practice improvement. Teams came to value not only patients’ knowledge but also changes wrought by working collaboratively over time. CONCLUSION: Establishing practice improvement partnerships remains challenging, but partnering with patients on improvement journeys offers distinctive gains for high-quality patient-centered care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Engaging diverse patient partners requires significant disruption to organizational norms and routines, and the trend toward team-based primary care offers a fertile context for patient partnerships. Material, technical, and sociocultural resources should be evaluated not only for whether they overcome specific challenges but also for how they enhance the shared learning journey. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7919701/ /pubmed/33630504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Features Alidina, Shehnaz Martelli, Peter F. J. Singer, Sara Aveling, Emma-Louise Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study |
title | Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study |
title_full | Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study |
title_short | Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study |
title_sort | optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: a qualitative study |
topic | Features |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7919701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alidinashehnaz optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy AT martellipeterf optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy AT jsingersara optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy AT avelingemmalouise optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy |