Cargando…

Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The need to expand and better engage patients in primary care improvement persists. PURPOSE: Recognizing a continuum of forms of engagement, this study focused on identifying lessons for optimizing patient partnerships, wherein engagement is characterized by shared decision-making and pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alidina, Shehnaz, Martelli, Peter F., J. Singer, Sara, Aveling, Emma-Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7919701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250
_version_ 1783658175934758912
author Alidina, Shehnaz
Martelli, Peter F.
J. Singer, Sara
Aveling, Emma-Louise
author_facet Alidina, Shehnaz
Martelli, Peter F.
J. Singer, Sara
Aveling, Emma-Louise
author_sort Alidina, Shehnaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need to expand and better engage patients in primary care improvement persists. PURPOSE: Recognizing a continuum of forms of engagement, this study focused on identifying lessons for optimizing patient partnerships, wherein engagement is characterized by shared decision-making and practice improvement codesign. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-three semistructured interviews with providers and patients involved in improvement efforts in seven U.S. primary care practices in the Academic Innovations Collaborative (AIC). The AIC aimed to implement primary care improvement, emphasizing patient engagement in the process. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Sites varied in their achievement of patient partnerships, encountering material, technical, and sociocultural obstacles. Time was a challenge for all sites, as was engaging a diversity of patients. Technical training on improvement processes and shared learning “on the job” were important. External, organizational, and individual-level resources helped overcome sociocultural challenges: The AIC drove provider buy-in, a team-based improvement approach helped shift relationships from providers and recipients toward teammates, and individual qualities and behaviors that flattened hierarchies and strengthened interpersonal relationships further enhanced “teamness.” A key factor influencing progress toward transformative partnerships was a strong shared learning journey, characterized by frequent interactions, proximity to improvement decision-making, and learning together from the “lived experience” of practice improvement. Teams came to value not only patients’ knowledge but also changes wrought by working collaboratively over time. CONCLUSION: Establishing practice improvement partnerships remains challenging, but partnering with patients on improvement journeys offers distinctive gains for high-quality patient-centered care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Engaging diverse patient partners requires significant disruption to organizational norms and routines, and the trend toward team-based primary care offers a fertile context for patient partnerships. Material, technical, and sociocultural resources should be evaluated not only for whether they overcome specific challenges but also for how they enhance the shared learning journey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7919701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79197012021-03-01 Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study Alidina, Shehnaz Martelli, Peter F. J. Singer, Sara Aveling, Emma-Louise Health Care Manage Rev Features BACKGROUND: The need to expand and better engage patients in primary care improvement persists. PURPOSE: Recognizing a continuum of forms of engagement, this study focused on identifying lessons for optimizing patient partnerships, wherein engagement is characterized by shared decision-making and practice improvement codesign. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-three semistructured interviews with providers and patients involved in improvement efforts in seven U.S. primary care practices in the Academic Innovations Collaborative (AIC). The AIC aimed to implement primary care improvement, emphasizing patient engagement in the process. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Sites varied in their achievement of patient partnerships, encountering material, technical, and sociocultural obstacles. Time was a challenge for all sites, as was engaging a diversity of patients. Technical training on improvement processes and shared learning “on the job” were important. External, organizational, and individual-level resources helped overcome sociocultural challenges: The AIC drove provider buy-in, a team-based improvement approach helped shift relationships from providers and recipients toward teammates, and individual qualities and behaviors that flattened hierarchies and strengthened interpersonal relationships further enhanced “teamness.” A key factor influencing progress toward transformative partnerships was a strong shared learning journey, characterized by frequent interactions, proximity to improvement decision-making, and learning together from the “lived experience” of practice improvement. Teams came to value not only patients’ knowledge but also changes wrought by working collaboratively over time. CONCLUSION: Establishing practice improvement partnerships remains challenging, but partnering with patients on improvement journeys offers distinctive gains for high-quality patient-centered care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Engaging diverse patient partners requires significant disruption to organizational norms and routines, and the trend toward team-based primary care offers a fertile context for patient partnerships. Material, technical, and sociocultural resources should be evaluated not only for whether they overcome specific challenges but also for how they enhance the shared learning journey. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021 2019-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7919701/ /pubmed/33630504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Features
Alidina, Shehnaz
Martelli, Peter F.
J. Singer, Sara
Aveling, Emma-Louise
Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study
title Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study
title_full Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study
title_short Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study
title_sort optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: a qualitative study
topic Features
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7919701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33630504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250
work_keys_str_mv AT alidinashehnaz optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy
AT martellipeterf optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy
AT jsingersara optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy
AT avelingemmalouise optimizingpatientpartnershipinprimarycareimprovementaqualitativestudy