Cargando…

Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2019)

Background and purpose — Dislocation is one of the most frequent reasons for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for an acute fracture. A dual mobility cup (DMC) might reduce this risk. We determined the cup revision rate after THA for an acute fracture according to type of cup. Patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bloemheuvel, Esther M, Van Steenbergen, Liza N, Swierstra, Bart A
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7919868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33172317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1845031

Ejemplares similares

Dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasties: trend over time in use, patient characteristics, and mid-term revision in 3,038 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016)
por: Bloemheuvel, Esther M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Lower 5-year cup re-revision rate for dual mobility cups compared with unipolar cups: report of 15,922 cup revision cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016)
por: Bloemheuvel, Esther M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparable mortality but higher revision rate after uncemented compared with cemented total hip arthroplasties in patients 80 years and older: report of 43,053 cases of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: BLOEMHEUVEL, Esther M, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Mortality and revision rate of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty after hip fracture: an analysis of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: Duijnisveld, Bouke J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Kuijpers, Martijn F L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Similar revision rate after cemented and cementless femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 1,879 revision hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: VAN DOOREN, Bart, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision
por: Moerman, Sophie, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The effect of bearing type on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of 209,912 primary total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Peters, Rinne M, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Survival and reasons for revision of the uncemented Symax hip stem: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study
por: Kruijntjens, Dennis S. M. G., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty: A Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register study of 1,780 revisions
por: Lazarinis, Stergios, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Revision risk of salvage compared with acute total hip arthroplasty following femoral neck fracture: an analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: SCHMITZ, Peter P, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Revision risk by using the direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty compared with postero-lateral approach: early nationwide results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: VAN DOOREN, Bart, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) and the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA): comparison of patient and procedure characteristics in 475,685 cases
por: Van Steenbergen, Liza N, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 166,231 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: Zijlstra, Wierd P, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A significant change towards cemented fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years in the Netherlands: results of an observational cohort study in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register in 28,516 primary hip replacements and 1285 revision procedures
por: Kuijpers, Martijn FL, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk for re-revision and type of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in hip or knee arthroplasty revisions: report of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: BOS, Pieter K, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

No increased risk of early revision during the implementation phase of new cup designs: Analysis of 52,903 hip arthroplasties reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Mohaddes, Maziar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Nationwide review of mixed and non-mixed components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study
por: Peters, Rinne M, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty
por: García-Rey, Eduardo, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Survival of uncemented acetabular monoblock cups: Evaluation of 210 hips in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Weiss, Rüdiger J, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Higher risk of 2-year cup revision of ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing: analysis of 33,454 primary press-fit total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: van Loon, Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Population-based 10-year cumulative revision risks after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis to inform patients in clinical practice: a competing risk analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Gademan, Maaike G J, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The learning curve of the direct anterior approach is 100 cases: an analysis based on 15,875 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: PETERS, Rinne M, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cup Arthroplasty in Hip Joint Surgery
por: Kini, M. G., et al.
Publicado: (1950)

Total hip arthroplasty after hip fracture
por: Chaudhry, Harman
Publicado: (2016)

More hip complications after total hip arthroplasty than after hemiarthroplasty as hip fracture treatment: analysis of 5,815 matched pairs in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Hansson, Susanne, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Acute total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures using modern porous metal cup
por: Malhotra, Rajesh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
por: Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register
por: Kuijpers, M. F. L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Navigated Acetabular Cup Fixation for Acetabular Deformity or Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
por: Yun, Ho Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Gundtoft, Per Hviid, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of dual-mobility cup and unipolar cup for prevention of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty
por: Gonzalez, Amanda Inez, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Fractures: Time to Surgery With Respect to Surgical Revision, Failure, and Mortality
por: Müller, Franz, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Increased risk of revision of acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite: A Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register study involving 8,043 total hip replacements
por: Lazarinis, Stergios, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Fracture of Ceramic Liner and Head in a Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Sandwich Type Cup
por: Reátegui, Diego, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery: Analysis of 2,460 first-time cup revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Mohaddes, Maziar, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

No clinically relevant difference in patient-reported outcomes between the direct superior approach and the posterolateral or anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 37,976 primary hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry
por: VAN DOOREN, Bart, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Survival of 11,390 Continuum cups in primary total hip arthroplasty based on data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register
por: Hemmilä, Matias, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

High risk of hip dislocation following polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty—is cup revision necessary?
por: Dammerer, D., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Survival and revision causes of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and the Mitch proximal epiphyseal replacement: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Tang-Jensen, Maja, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_f6toq5os3ssjdu2hlcbk1tdarp