Cargando…

Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Several immune checkpoint molecules and immune targets in leukemic cells have been investigated. Recent studies have suggested the potential clinical benefits of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially targeting CD33, CD123, and CLL-1, as well as immune checkpoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tabata, Rikako, Chi, SungGi, Yuda, Junichiro, Minami, Yosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041944
_version_ 1783658276777361408
author Tabata, Rikako
Chi, SungGi
Yuda, Junichiro
Minami, Yosuke
author_facet Tabata, Rikako
Chi, SungGi
Yuda, Junichiro
Minami, Yosuke
author_sort Tabata, Rikako
collection PubMed
description Several immune checkpoint molecules and immune targets in leukemic cells have been investigated. Recent studies have suggested the potential clinical benefits of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially targeting CD33, CD123, and CLL-1, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD (programmed cell death)-1 and anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) antibodies) with or without conventional chemotherapy. Early-phase clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T or natural killer (NK) cells for relapsed/refractory AML showed complete remission (CR) or marked reduction of marrow blasts in a few enrolled patients. Bi-/tri-specific antibodies (e.g., bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and dual-affinity retargeting (DART)) exhibited 11–67% CR rates with 13–78% risk of cytokine-releasing syndrome (CRS). Conventional chemotherapy in combination with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 antibody for relapsed/refractory AML showed 10–36% CR rates with 7–24 month-long median survival. The current advantages of IO therapy in the field of AML are summarized herein. However, although cancer vaccination should be included in the concept of IO therapy, it is not mentioned in this review because of the paucity of relevant evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7920435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79204352021-03-02 Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Tabata, Rikako Chi, SungGi Yuda, Junichiro Minami, Yosuke Int J Mol Sci Review Several immune checkpoint molecules and immune targets in leukemic cells have been investigated. Recent studies have suggested the potential clinical benefits of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially targeting CD33, CD123, and CLL-1, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD (programmed cell death)-1 and anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) antibodies) with or without conventional chemotherapy. Early-phase clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T or natural killer (NK) cells for relapsed/refractory AML showed complete remission (CR) or marked reduction of marrow blasts in a few enrolled patients. Bi-/tri-specific antibodies (e.g., bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and dual-affinity retargeting (DART)) exhibited 11–67% CR rates with 13–78% risk of cytokine-releasing syndrome (CRS). Conventional chemotherapy in combination with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 antibody for relapsed/refractory AML showed 10–36% CR rates with 7–24 month-long median survival. The current advantages of IO therapy in the field of AML are summarized herein. However, although cancer vaccination should be included in the concept of IO therapy, it is not mentioned in this review because of the paucity of relevant evidence. MDPI 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7920435/ /pubmed/33669431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041944 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tabata, Rikako
Chi, SungGi
Yuda, Junichiro
Minami, Yosuke
Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_fullStr Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_short Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_sort emerging immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041944
work_keys_str_mv AT tabatarikako emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT chisunggi emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT yudajunichiro emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia
AT minamiyosuke emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia