Cargando…
Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Several immune checkpoint molecules and immune targets in leukemic cells have been investigated. Recent studies have suggested the potential clinical benefits of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially targeting CD33, CD123, and CLL-1, as well as immune checkpoi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041944 |
_version_ | 1783658276777361408 |
---|---|
author | Tabata, Rikako Chi, SungGi Yuda, Junichiro Minami, Yosuke |
author_facet | Tabata, Rikako Chi, SungGi Yuda, Junichiro Minami, Yosuke |
author_sort | Tabata, Rikako |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several immune checkpoint molecules and immune targets in leukemic cells have been investigated. Recent studies have suggested the potential clinical benefits of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially targeting CD33, CD123, and CLL-1, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD (programmed cell death)-1 and anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) antibodies) with or without conventional chemotherapy. Early-phase clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T or natural killer (NK) cells for relapsed/refractory AML showed complete remission (CR) or marked reduction of marrow blasts in a few enrolled patients. Bi-/tri-specific antibodies (e.g., bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and dual-affinity retargeting (DART)) exhibited 11–67% CR rates with 13–78% risk of cytokine-releasing syndrome (CRS). Conventional chemotherapy in combination with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 antibody for relapsed/refractory AML showed 10–36% CR rates with 7–24 month-long median survival. The current advantages of IO therapy in the field of AML are summarized herein. However, although cancer vaccination should be included in the concept of IO therapy, it is not mentioned in this review because of the paucity of relevant evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7920435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79204352021-03-02 Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Tabata, Rikako Chi, SungGi Yuda, Junichiro Minami, Yosuke Int J Mol Sci Review Several immune checkpoint molecules and immune targets in leukemic cells have been investigated. Recent studies have suggested the potential clinical benefits of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy against acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially targeting CD33, CD123, and CLL-1, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., anti-PD (programmed cell death)-1 and anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) antibodies) with or without conventional chemotherapy. Early-phase clinical trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T or natural killer (NK) cells for relapsed/refractory AML showed complete remission (CR) or marked reduction of marrow blasts in a few enrolled patients. Bi-/tri-specific antibodies (e.g., bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and dual-affinity retargeting (DART)) exhibited 11–67% CR rates with 13–78% risk of cytokine-releasing syndrome (CRS). Conventional chemotherapy in combination with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 antibody for relapsed/refractory AML showed 10–36% CR rates with 7–24 month-long median survival. The current advantages of IO therapy in the field of AML are summarized herein. However, although cancer vaccination should be included in the concept of IO therapy, it is not mentioned in this review because of the paucity of relevant evidence. MDPI 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7920435/ /pubmed/33669431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041944 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Tabata, Rikako Chi, SungGi Yuda, Junichiro Minami, Yosuke Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title | Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full | Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_fullStr | Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_short | Emerging Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_sort | emerging immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tabatarikako emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT chisunggi emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT yudajunichiro emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT minamiyosuke emergingimmunotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia |