Cargando…

Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system

Spatial acuity measured by 2-point discrimination (2PD) threshold and spatial summation of pain (SSp) are useful paradigms to probe the pain system in humans. Whether the results of these paradigms are influenced by different stimulus modalities and intensities is unclear. The aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamczyk, Wacław M., Szikszay, Tibor M., Kung, Tiffany, Carvalho, Gabriela F., Luedtke, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002069
_version_ 1783658289557405696
author Adamczyk, Wacław M.
Szikszay, Tibor M.
Kung, Tiffany
Carvalho, Gabriela F.
Luedtke, Kerstin
author_facet Adamczyk, Wacław M.
Szikszay, Tibor M.
Kung, Tiffany
Carvalho, Gabriela F.
Luedtke, Kerstin
author_sort Adamczyk, Wacław M.
collection PubMed
description Spatial acuity measured by 2-point discrimination (2PD) threshold and spatial summation of pain (SSp) are useful paradigms to probe the pain system in humans. Whether the results of these paradigms are influenced by different stimulus modalities and intensities is unclear. The aim of this study was to test 2PD controlling the stimulus modality and the intensity and to investigate the effect of modality on SSp. Thirty-seven healthy volunteers were tested for 2PDs with 2 stimulus modalities (electrocutaneous and mechanical) and intensity (noxious and innocuous). For each condition, participants received stimuli to either 1 or 2 points on their lower back with different distances (2-14 cm, steps of 2 cm). It was found that 2PDs were significantly smaller for noxious stimuli for both modalities. By contrast, between-modality comparison reproduced previous reports of impaired acuity for noxious stimulation. Higher pain intensities were reported when a larger area was stimulated (SSp), independent of the modality. Furthermore, reported pain intensities were higher when the distance between 2 stimulated areas was increased from 2 to 6 cm (P < 0.001), 8 cm (P < 0.01), and 14 cm (P < 0.01). 2PDs determined by mechanical and electrocutaneous stimuli were significantly correlated within both stimulus intensities, ie, innocuous (r = 0.34, P < 0.05) and noxious (r = 0.35, P < 0.05). The current results show 3 novel findings: (1) the precision of the pain system might be higher than in the innocuous (tactile) system when mechanical and electrocutaneous modalities are used, (2) the pattern of distance-based and area-based SSp seems to be comparable irrespective of the modality applied (mechanical and electrocutaneous), and (3) both modalities are moderately correlated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7920491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79204912021-03-22 Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system Adamczyk, Wacław M. Szikszay, Tibor M. Kung, Tiffany Carvalho, Gabriela F. Luedtke, Kerstin Pain Research Paper Spatial acuity measured by 2-point discrimination (2PD) threshold and spatial summation of pain (SSp) are useful paradigms to probe the pain system in humans. Whether the results of these paradigms are influenced by different stimulus modalities and intensities is unclear. The aim of this study was to test 2PD controlling the stimulus modality and the intensity and to investigate the effect of modality on SSp. Thirty-seven healthy volunteers were tested for 2PDs with 2 stimulus modalities (electrocutaneous and mechanical) and intensity (noxious and innocuous). For each condition, participants received stimuli to either 1 or 2 points on their lower back with different distances (2-14 cm, steps of 2 cm). It was found that 2PDs were significantly smaller for noxious stimuli for both modalities. By contrast, between-modality comparison reproduced previous reports of impaired acuity for noxious stimulation. Higher pain intensities were reported when a larger area was stimulated (SSp), independent of the modality. Furthermore, reported pain intensities were higher when the distance between 2 stimulated areas was increased from 2 to 6 cm (P < 0.001), 8 cm (P < 0.01), and 14 cm (P < 0.01). 2PDs determined by mechanical and electrocutaneous stimuli were significantly correlated within both stimulus intensities, ie, innocuous (r = 0.34, P < 0.05) and noxious (r = 0.35, P < 0.05). The current results show 3 novel findings: (1) the precision of the pain system might be higher than in the innocuous (tactile) system when mechanical and electrocutaneous modalities are used, (2) the pattern of distance-based and area-based SSp seems to be comparable irrespective of the modality applied (mechanical and electrocutaneous), and (3) both modalities are moderately correlated. Wolters Kluwer 2021-03 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7920491/ /pubmed/32925592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002069 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Adamczyk, Wacław M.
Szikszay, Tibor M.
Kung, Tiffany
Carvalho, Gabriela F.
Luedtke, Kerstin
Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system
title Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system
title_full Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system
title_fullStr Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system
title_full_unstemmed Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system
title_short Not as “blurred” as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system
title_sort not as “blurred” as expected? acuity and spatial summation in the pain system
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002069
work_keys_str_mv AT adamczykwacławm notasblurredasexpectedacuityandspatialsummationinthepainsystem
AT szikszaytiborm notasblurredasexpectedacuityandspatialsummationinthepainsystem
AT kungtiffany notasblurredasexpectedacuityandspatialsummationinthepainsystem
AT carvalhogabrielaf notasblurredasexpectedacuityandspatialsummationinthepainsystem
AT luedtkekerstin notasblurredasexpectedacuityandspatialsummationinthepainsystem