Cargando…

Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To understand contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative diseases (LONDs), and identify whether practices address the internationally accepted goals of genetic counseling: interpretation, counseling, education, and support. METHODS: Four databas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crook, Ashley, Jacobs, Chris, Newton-John, Toby, O’Shea, Rosie, McEwen, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10461-5
_version_ 1783658298751320064
author Crook, Ashley
Jacobs, Chris
Newton-John, Toby
O’Shea, Rosie
McEwen, Alison
author_facet Crook, Ashley
Jacobs, Chris
Newton-John, Toby
O’Shea, Rosie
McEwen, Alison
author_sort Crook, Ashley
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To understand contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative diseases (LONDs), and identify whether practices address the internationally accepted goals of genetic counseling: interpretation, counseling, education, and support. METHODS: Four databases were systematically searched for articles published from 2009 to 2020. Peer-reviewed research articles in English that reported research and clinical genetic counseling and testing practices for LONDs were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted to describe different practices and map genetic counseling activities to the goals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Qualsyst tool. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019121421). RESULTS: Sixty-one studies from 68 papers were included. Most papers focused on predictive testing (58/68) and Huntington’s disease (41/68). There was variation between papers in study design, study population, outcomes, interventions, and settings. Although there were commonalities, novel and inconsistent genetic counseling practices were identified. Eighteen papers addressed all four goals of genetic counseling. CONCLUSION: Contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for LONDs are varied and informed by regional differences and the presence of different health providers. A flexible, multidisciplinary, client- and family-centered care continues to emerge. As genetic testing becomes a routine part of care for patients (and their relatives), health providers must balance their limited time and resources with ensuring clients are safely and effectively counseled, and all four genetic counseling goals are addressed. Areas of further research include diagnostic and reproductive genetic counseling/testing practices, evaluations of novel approaches to care, and the role and use of different health providers in practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10461-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7920548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79205482021-03-02 Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review Crook, Ashley Jacobs, Chris Newton-John, Toby O’Shea, Rosie McEwen, Alison J Neurol Review OBJECTIVE: To understand contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative diseases (LONDs), and identify whether practices address the internationally accepted goals of genetic counseling: interpretation, counseling, education, and support. METHODS: Four databases were systematically searched for articles published from 2009 to 2020. Peer-reviewed research articles in English that reported research and clinical genetic counseling and testing practices for LONDs were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted to describe different practices and map genetic counseling activities to the goals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Qualsyst tool. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019121421). RESULTS: Sixty-one studies from 68 papers were included. Most papers focused on predictive testing (58/68) and Huntington’s disease (41/68). There was variation between papers in study design, study population, outcomes, interventions, and settings. Although there were commonalities, novel and inconsistent genetic counseling practices were identified. Eighteen papers addressed all four goals of genetic counseling. CONCLUSION: Contemporary genetic counseling and testing practices for LONDs are varied and informed by regional differences and the presence of different health providers. A flexible, multidisciplinary, client- and family-centered care continues to emerge. As genetic testing becomes a routine part of care for patients (and their relatives), health providers must balance their limited time and resources with ensuring clients are safely and effectively counseled, and all four genetic counseling goals are addressed. Areas of further research include diagnostic and reproductive genetic counseling/testing practices, evaluations of novel approaches to care, and the role and use of different health providers in practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10461-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-01 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC7920548/ /pubmed/33649871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10461-5 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review
Crook, Ashley
Jacobs, Chris
Newton-John, Toby
O’Shea, Rosie
McEwen, Alison
Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review
title Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review
title_full Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review
title_fullStr Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review
title_short Genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review
title_sort genetic counseling and testing practices for late-onset neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10461-5
work_keys_str_mv AT crookashley geneticcounselingandtestingpracticesforlateonsetneurodegenerativediseaseasystematicreview
AT jacobschris geneticcounselingandtestingpracticesforlateonsetneurodegenerativediseaseasystematicreview
AT newtonjohntoby geneticcounselingandtestingpracticesforlateonsetneurodegenerativediseaseasystematicreview
AT oshearosie geneticcounselingandtestingpracticesforlateonsetneurodegenerativediseaseasystematicreview
AT mcewenalison geneticcounselingandtestingpracticesforlateonsetneurodegenerativediseaseasystematicreview