Cargando…
Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
GeneXpert-based testing with Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra assays is essential for tuberculosis diagnosis. However, testing may be affected by cartridge and staff shortages. More efficient testing strategies could help, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We searched the literature to syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2703.204090 |
_version_ | 1783658329275367424 |
---|---|
author | Cuevas, Luis E. Santos, Victor S. Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida Kontogianni, Konstantina Bimba, John S. Iem, Vibol Dominguez, Jose Adams, Emily Atienzar, Ana Cubas Edwards, Thomas Squire, S. Bertel Hall, Patricia J. Creswell, Jacob |
author_facet | Cuevas, Luis E. Santos, Victor S. Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida Kontogianni, Konstantina Bimba, John S. Iem, Vibol Dominguez, Jose Adams, Emily Atienzar, Ana Cubas Edwards, Thomas Squire, S. Bertel Hall, Patricia J. Creswell, Jacob |
author_sort | Cuevas, Luis E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | GeneXpert-based testing with Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra assays is essential for tuberculosis diagnosis. However, testing may be affected by cartridge and staff shortages. More efficient testing strategies could help, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We searched the literature to systematically review whether GeneXpert-based testing of pooled sputum samples achieves sensitivity and specificity similar to testing individual samples; this method could potentially save time and preserve the limited supply of cartridges. From 6 publications, we found 2-sample pools using Xpert MTB/RIF had 87.5% and 96.0% sensitivity (average sensitivity 94%; 95% CI 89.0%–98.0%) (2 studies). Four-sample pools averaged 91% sensitivity with Xpert MTB/RIF (2 studies) and 98% with Ultra (2 studies); combining >4 samples resulted in lower sensitivity. Two studies reported that pooling achieved 99%–100% specificity and 27%–31% in cartridge savings. Our results show that pooling may improve efficiency of GeneXpert-based testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7920689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79206892021-03-04 Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic Cuevas, Luis E. Santos, Victor S. Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida Kontogianni, Konstantina Bimba, John S. Iem, Vibol Dominguez, Jose Adams, Emily Atienzar, Ana Cubas Edwards, Thomas Squire, S. Bertel Hall, Patricia J. Creswell, Jacob Emerg Infect Dis Synopsis GeneXpert-based testing with Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra assays is essential for tuberculosis diagnosis. However, testing may be affected by cartridge and staff shortages. More efficient testing strategies could help, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We searched the literature to systematically review whether GeneXpert-based testing of pooled sputum samples achieves sensitivity and specificity similar to testing individual samples; this method could potentially save time and preserve the limited supply of cartridges. From 6 publications, we found 2-sample pools using Xpert MTB/RIF had 87.5% and 96.0% sensitivity (average sensitivity 94%; 95% CI 89.0%–98.0%) (2 studies). Four-sample pools averaged 91% sensitivity with Xpert MTB/RIF (2 studies) and 98% with Ultra (2 studies); combining >4 samples resulted in lower sensitivity. Two studies reported that pooling achieved 99%–100% specificity and 27%–31% in cartridge savings. Our results show that pooling may improve efficiency of GeneXpert-based testing. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7920689/ /pubmed/33622482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2703.204090 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Synopsis Cuevas, Luis E. Santos, Victor S. Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida Kontogianni, Konstantina Bimba, John S. Iem, Vibol Dominguez, Jose Adams, Emily Atienzar, Ana Cubas Edwards, Thomas Squire, S. Bertel Hall, Patricia J. Creswell, Jacob Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | systematic review of pooling sputum as an efficient method for xpert mtb/rif tuberculosis testing during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Synopsis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2703.204090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuevasluise systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT santosvictors systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT limashirleyveronicameloalmeida systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT kontogiannikonstantina systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT bimbajohns systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT iemvibol systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT dominguezjose systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT adamsemily systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT atienzaranacubas systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT edwardsthomas systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT squiresbertel systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT hallpatriciaj systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic AT creswelljacob systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic |