Cargando…

Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic

GeneXpert-based testing with Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra assays is essential for tuberculosis diagnosis. However, testing may be affected by cartridge and staff shortages. More efficient testing strategies could help, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We searched the literature to syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuevas, Luis E., Santos, Victor S., Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida, Kontogianni, Konstantina, Bimba, John S., Iem, Vibol, Dominguez, Jose, Adams, Emily, Atienzar, Ana Cubas, Edwards, Thomas, Squire, S. Bertel, Hall, Patricia J., Creswell, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2703.204090
_version_ 1783658329275367424
author Cuevas, Luis E.
Santos, Victor S.
Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida
Kontogianni, Konstantina
Bimba, John S.
Iem, Vibol
Dominguez, Jose
Adams, Emily
Atienzar, Ana Cubas
Edwards, Thomas
Squire, S. Bertel
Hall, Patricia J.
Creswell, Jacob
author_facet Cuevas, Luis E.
Santos, Victor S.
Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida
Kontogianni, Konstantina
Bimba, John S.
Iem, Vibol
Dominguez, Jose
Adams, Emily
Atienzar, Ana Cubas
Edwards, Thomas
Squire, S. Bertel
Hall, Patricia J.
Creswell, Jacob
author_sort Cuevas, Luis E.
collection PubMed
description GeneXpert-based testing with Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra assays is essential for tuberculosis diagnosis. However, testing may be affected by cartridge and staff shortages. More efficient testing strategies could help, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We searched the literature to systematically review whether GeneXpert-based testing of pooled sputum samples achieves sensitivity and specificity similar to testing individual samples; this method could potentially save time and preserve the limited supply of cartridges. From 6 publications, we found 2-sample pools using Xpert MTB/RIF had 87.5% and 96.0% sensitivity (average sensitivity 94%; 95% CI 89.0%–98.0%) (2 studies). Four-sample pools averaged 91% sensitivity with Xpert MTB/RIF (2 studies) and 98% with Ultra (2 studies); combining >4 samples resulted in lower sensitivity. Two studies reported that pooling achieved 99%–100% specificity and 27%–31% in cartridge savings. Our results show that pooling may improve efficiency of GeneXpert-based testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7920689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79206892021-03-04 Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic Cuevas, Luis E. Santos, Victor S. Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida Kontogianni, Konstantina Bimba, John S. Iem, Vibol Dominguez, Jose Adams, Emily Atienzar, Ana Cubas Edwards, Thomas Squire, S. Bertel Hall, Patricia J. Creswell, Jacob Emerg Infect Dis Synopsis GeneXpert-based testing with Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra assays is essential for tuberculosis diagnosis. However, testing may be affected by cartridge and staff shortages. More efficient testing strategies could help, especially during the coronavirus disease pandemic. We searched the literature to systematically review whether GeneXpert-based testing of pooled sputum samples achieves sensitivity and specificity similar to testing individual samples; this method could potentially save time and preserve the limited supply of cartridges. From 6 publications, we found 2-sample pools using Xpert MTB/RIF had 87.5% and 96.0% sensitivity (average sensitivity 94%; 95% CI 89.0%–98.0%) (2 studies). Four-sample pools averaged 91% sensitivity with Xpert MTB/RIF (2 studies) and 98% with Ultra (2 studies); combining >4 samples resulted in lower sensitivity. Two studies reported that pooling achieved 99%–100% specificity and 27%–31% in cartridge savings. Our results show that pooling may improve efficiency of GeneXpert-based testing. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7920689/ /pubmed/33622482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2703.204090 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Synopsis
Cuevas, Luis E.
Santos, Victor S.
Lima, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida
Kontogianni, Konstantina
Bimba, John S.
Iem, Vibol
Dominguez, Jose
Adams, Emily
Atienzar, Ana Cubas
Edwards, Thomas
Squire, S. Bertel
Hall, Patricia J.
Creswell, Jacob
Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short Systematic Review of Pooling Sputum as an Efficient Method for Xpert MTB/RIF Tuberculosis Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort systematic review of pooling sputum as an efficient method for xpert mtb/rif tuberculosis testing during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Synopsis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33622482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2703.204090
work_keys_str_mv AT cuevasluise systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT santosvictors systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT limashirleyveronicameloalmeida systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT kontogiannikonstantina systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT bimbajohns systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT iemvibol systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dominguezjose systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT adamsemily systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT atienzaranacubas systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT edwardsthomas systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT squiresbertel systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hallpatriciaj systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT creswelljacob systematicreviewofpoolingsputumasanefficientmethodforxpertmtbriftuberculosistestingduringthecovid19pandemic