Cargando…

Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy

Governance capacity and legitimacy as two important dimensions in crisis management are crucial for preparing for, making sense of, handling, and learning from crises like epidemics/pandemics. We compare governance capacity and legitimacy of the government in China in response to the SARS and COVID-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Tom, Ma, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921278/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00510-y
_version_ 1783658433840414720
author Christensen, Tom
Ma, Liang
author_facet Christensen, Tom
Ma, Liang
author_sort Christensen, Tom
collection PubMed
description Governance capacity and legitimacy as two important dimensions in crisis management are crucial for preparing for, making sense of, handling, and learning from crises like epidemics/pandemics. We compare governance capacity and legitimacy of the government in China in response to the SARS and COVID-19 pandemics. Our comparison of the handling processes of two pandemics suggests both positive changes and persistent inertia. Both governance capacity and legitimacy has been improved over time, and there is a tendency that they reinforce each other. Such comparisons help to facilitate learning from the past to be better prepared for the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7921278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79212782021-03-02 Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy Christensen, Tom Ma, Liang Public Organiz Rev Article Governance capacity and legitimacy as two important dimensions in crisis management are crucial for preparing for, making sense of, handling, and learning from crises like epidemics/pandemics. We compare governance capacity and legitimacy of the government in China in response to the SARS and COVID-19 pandemics. Our comparison of the handling processes of two pandemics suggests both positive changes and persistent inertia. Both governance capacity and legitimacy has been improved over time, and there is a tendency that they reinforce each other. Such comparisons help to facilitate learning from the past to be better prepared for the future. Springer US 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7921278/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00510-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Christensen, Tom
Ma, Liang
Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
title Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
title_full Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
title_fullStr Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
title_full_unstemmed Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
title_short Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
title_sort comparing sars and covid-19: challenges of governance capacity and legitimacy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921278/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00510-y
work_keys_str_mv AT christensentom comparingsarsandcovid19challengesofgovernancecapacityandlegitimacy
AT maliang comparingsarsandcovid19challengesofgovernancecapacityandlegitimacy