Cargando…
Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy
Governance capacity and legitimacy as two important dimensions in crisis management are crucial for preparing for, making sense of, handling, and learning from crises like epidemics/pandemics. We compare governance capacity and legitimacy of the government in China in response to the SARS and COVID-...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921278/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00510-y |
_version_ | 1783658433840414720 |
---|---|
author | Christensen, Tom Ma, Liang |
author_facet | Christensen, Tom Ma, Liang |
author_sort | Christensen, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | Governance capacity and legitimacy as two important dimensions in crisis management are crucial for preparing for, making sense of, handling, and learning from crises like epidemics/pandemics. We compare governance capacity and legitimacy of the government in China in response to the SARS and COVID-19 pandemics. Our comparison of the handling processes of two pandemics suggests both positive changes and persistent inertia. Both governance capacity and legitimacy has been improved over time, and there is a tendency that they reinforce each other. Such comparisons help to facilitate learning from the past to be better prepared for the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7921278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79212782021-03-02 Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy Christensen, Tom Ma, Liang Public Organiz Rev Article Governance capacity and legitimacy as two important dimensions in crisis management are crucial for preparing for, making sense of, handling, and learning from crises like epidemics/pandemics. We compare governance capacity and legitimacy of the government in China in response to the SARS and COVID-19 pandemics. Our comparison of the handling processes of two pandemics suggests both positive changes and persistent inertia. Both governance capacity and legitimacy has been improved over time, and there is a tendency that they reinforce each other. Such comparisons help to facilitate learning from the past to be better prepared for the future. Springer US 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7921278/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00510-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Christensen, Tom Ma, Liang Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy |
title | Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy |
title_full | Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy |
title_fullStr | Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy |
title_short | Comparing SARS and COVID-19: Challenges of Governance Capacity and Legitimacy |
title_sort | comparing sars and covid-19: challenges of governance capacity and legitimacy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921278/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00510-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christensentom comparingsarsandcovid19challengesofgovernancecapacityandlegitimacy AT maliang comparingsarsandcovid19challengesofgovernancecapacityandlegitimacy |