Cargando…
High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review instantiates the efficacy and safety of HFNC in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Globally, the healthcare system is facing an unprecedented crisis of resources due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Fever, cough, dyspnea, myalg...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00439-4 |
_version_ | 1783658435088220160 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Abhishek Khanna, Puneet Sarkar, Soumya |
author_facet | Singh, Abhishek Khanna, Puneet Sarkar, Soumya |
author_sort | Singh, Abhishek |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review instantiates the efficacy and safety of HFNC in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Globally, the healthcare system is facing an unprecedented crisis of resources due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, fatigue, and pneumonia are the most common symptoms associated with it. The incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation in ICU patients ranges from 29.1 to 89.9%. Supplemental oxygen therapy is the main stay treatment for managing hypoxemic respiratory failure. The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a novel non-invasive strategy for better oxygenation and ventilation in critically ill patients. In this grim scenario, a reduction in mechanical ventilation by means of HFNC is of prime interest SUMMARY: HFNC is considered an aerosol-generating intervention with the risk of viral aerosolization with a concern of potential nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, there is no consensus regarding the use of HFNC in novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia (NCIP). HFNC seems to be an effective and safe treatment modality in acute respiratory failure with optimal settings and selection of ideal patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7921283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79212832021-03-02 High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review Singh, Abhishek Khanna, Puneet Sarkar, Soumya Curr Anesthesiol Rep Critical Care Anesthesia (BS Rasmussen, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review instantiates the efficacy and safety of HFNC in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Globally, the healthcare system is facing an unprecedented crisis of resources due to the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, fatigue, and pneumonia are the most common symptoms associated with it. The incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation in ICU patients ranges from 29.1 to 89.9%. Supplemental oxygen therapy is the main stay treatment for managing hypoxemic respiratory failure. The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a novel non-invasive strategy for better oxygenation and ventilation in critically ill patients. In this grim scenario, a reduction in mechanical ventilation by means of HFNC is of prime interest SUMMARY: HFNC is considered an aerosol-generating intervention with the risk of viral aerosolization with a concern of potential nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, there is no consensus regarding the use of HFNC in novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia (NCIP). HFNC seems to be an effective and safe treatment modality in acute respiratory failure with optimal settings and selection of ideal patients. Springer US 2021-03-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7921283/ /pubmed/33679254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00439-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Critical Care Anesthesia (BS Rasmussen, Section Editor) Singh, Abhishek Khanna, Puneet Sarkar, Soumya High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review |
title | High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review |
title_full | High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review |
title_fullStr | High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review |
title_full_unstemmed | High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review |
title_short | High-Flow Nasal Cannula, a Boon or a Bane for COVID-19 Patients? An Evidence-Based Review |
title_sort | high-flow nasal cannula, a boon or a bane for covid-19 patients? an evidence-based review |
topic | Critical Care Anesthesia (BS Rasmussen, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33679254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00439-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhabhishek highflownasalcannulaaboonorabaneforcovid19patientsanevidencebasedreview AT khannapuneet highflownasalcannulaaboonorabaneforcovid19patientsanevidencebasedreview AT sarkarsoumya highflownasalcannulaaboonorabaneforcovid19patientsanevidencebasedreview |