Cargando…

Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from dried blood spots (DBS) provides a fast, inexpensive, and convenient method for large-scale epidemiological studies. This study compared the performance of PCR between DNA extracted from DBS and DNA obtained from whole...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahittikorn, Aongart, Masangkay, Frederick Ramirez, Kotepui, Kwuntida Uthaisar, De Jesus Milanez, Giovanni, Kotepui, Manas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83977-5
_version_ 1783658509475250176
author Mahittikorn, Aongart
Masangkay, Frederick Ramirez
Kotepui, Kwuntida Uthaisar
De Jesus Milanez, Giovanni
Kotepui, Manas
author_facet Mahittikorn, Aongart
Masangkay, Frederick Ramirez
Kotepui, Kwuntida Uthaisar
De Jesus Milanez, Giovanni
Kotepui, Manas
author_sort Mahittikorn, Aongart
collection PubMed
description Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from dried blood spots (DBS) provides a fast, inexpensive, and convenient method for large-scale epidemiological studies. This study compared the performance of PCR between DNA extracted from DBS and DNA obtained from whole blood for detecting malarial parasites. Primary studies assessing the diagnostic performance of PCR using DNA extracted from DBS and whole blood for detecting malarial parasites were obtained from the ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted in forest plots using Review Manager version 5.3. Statistical analysis was performed via random-effects meta-analysis. Data heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. Of the 904 studies retrieved from the databases, seven were included in this study. The pooled meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the comparative performance of PCR for detecting malaria parasites between DNA extracted from DBS and that extracted from whole blood (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.62–1.16; I(2) = 78%). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that PCR using DNA extracted from DBS was less accurate in detecting Plasmodium vivax than that using DNA extracted from whole blood (OR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.77–0.94). In conclusion, a significant difference in detecting P. vivax was observed between PCR using DNA extracted from DBS and that using DNA extracted from whole blood. Therefore, P. vivax in endemic areas should be identified and detected with care with PCR using DNA obtained from DBS which potentially leads to a negative result. Further studies are required to investigate the performance of PCR using DBS for detecting P. vivax and other malarial parasites to provide data in research and routine surveillance of malaria, especially with renewed efforts towards the eradication of the disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7921648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79216482021-03-02 Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis Mahittikorn, Aongart Masangkay, Frederick Ramirez Kotepui, Kwuntida Uthaisar De Jesus Milanez, Giovanni Kotepui, Manas Sci Rep Article Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from dried blood spots (DBS) provides a fast, inexpensive, and convenient method for large-scale epidemiological studies. This study compared the performance of PCR between DNA extracted from DBS and DNA obtained from whole blood for detecting malarial parasites. Primary studies assessing the diagnostic performance of PCR using DNA extracted from DBS and whole blood for detecting malarial parasites were obtained from the ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted in forest plots using Review Manager version 5.3. Statistical analysis was performed via random-effects meta-analysis. Data heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) statistic. Of the 904 studies retrieved from the databases, seven were included in this study. The pooled meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the comparative performance of PCR for detecting malaria parasites between DNA extracted from DBS and that extracted from whole blood (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.62–1.16; I(2) = 78%). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that PCR using DNA extracted from DBS was less accurate in detecting Plasmodium vivax than that using DNA extracted from whole blood (OR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.77–0.94). In conclusion, a significant difference in detecting P. vivax was observed between PCR using DNA extracted from DBS and that using DNA extracted from whole blood. Therefore, P. vivax in endemic areas should be identified and detected with care with PCR using DNA obtained from DBS which potentially leads to a negative result. Further studies are required to investigate the performance of PCR using DBS for detecting P. vivax and other malarial parasites to provide data in research and routine surveillance of malaria, especially with renewed efforts towards the eradication of the disease. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7921648/ /pubmed/33649410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83977-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mahittikorn, Aongart
Masangkay, Frederick Ramirez
Kotepui, Kwuntida Uthaisar
De Jesus Milanez, Giovanni
Kotepui, Manas
Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis
title Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis
title_full Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis
title_short Comparative performance of PCR using DNA extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis
title_sort comparative performance of pcr using dna extracted from dried blood spots and whole blood samples for malaria diagnosis: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33649410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83977-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mahittikornaongart comparativeperformanceofpcrusingdnaextractedfromdriedbloodspotsandwholebloodsamplesformalariadiagnosisametaanalysis
AT masangkayfrederickramirez comparativeperformanceofpcrusingdnaextractedfromdriedbloodspotsandwholebloodsamplesformalariadiagnosisametaanalysis
AT kotepuikwuntidauthaisar comparativeperformanceofpcrusingdnaextractedfromdriedbloodspotsandwholebloodsamplesformalariadiagnosisametaanalysis
AT dejesusmilanezgiovanni comparativeperformanceofpcrusingdnaextractedfromdriedbloodspotsandwholebloodsamplesformalariadiagnosisametaanalysis
AT kotepuimanas comparativeperformanceofpcrusingdnaextractedfromdriedbloodspotsandwholebloodsamplesformalariadiagnosisametaanalysis