Cargando…

Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon

Infection after reconstructive surgery for microtia is a technical challenge. This can be a sign of cholesteatoma formation by entrapment of epithelium in the middle or outer ear, specifically when the patient does not respond to first choice antibiotic therapy and debridement. Two patients with mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Hogezand, R.M., Smit, A.L., Breugem, C.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.01.011
_version_ 1783658531561406464
author van Hogezand, R.M.
Smit, A.L.
Breugem, C.C.
author_facet van Hogezand, R.M.
Smit, A.L.
Breugem, C.C.
author_sort van Hogezand, R.M.
collection PubMed
description Infection after reconstructive surgery for microtia is a technical challenge. This can be a sign of cholesteatoma formation by entrapment of epithelium in the middle or outer ear, specifically when the patient does not respond to first choice antibiotic therapy and debridement. Two patients with microtia presented themselves with severe infections after ear reconstruction. In both cases cholesteatoma was diagnosed as the cause of the infection. After cholesteatoma management an additional surgical procedure was necessary to improve the esthetic outcome. The plastic surgeon should identify possible signs of cholesteatoma after reconstruction of the auricle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7921746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79217462021-03-12 Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon van Hogezand, R.M. Smit, A.L. Breugem, C.C. JPRAS Open Case Report Infection after reconstructive surgery for microtia is a technical challenge. This can be a sign of cholesteatoma formation by entrapment of epithelium in the middle or outer ear, specifically when the patient does not respond to first choice antibiotic therapy and debridement. Two patients with microtia presented themselves with severe infections after ear reconstruction. In both cases cholesteatoma was diagnosed as the cause of the infection. After cholesteatoma management an additional surgical procedure was necessary to improve the esthetic outcome. The plastic surgeon should identify possible signs of cholesteatoma after reconstruction of the auricle. Elsevier 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7921746/ /pubmed/33718565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.01.011 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
van Hogezand, R.M.
Smit, A.L.
Breugem, C.C.
Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon
title Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon
title_full Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon
title_fullStr Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon
title_full_unstemmed Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon
title_short Microtia and cholesteatoma: Implications for the reconstructive surgeon
title_sort microtia and cholesteatoma: implications for the reconstructive surgeon
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33718565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.01.011
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhogezandrm microtiaandcholesteatomaimplicationsforthereconstructivesurgeon
AT smital microtiaandcholesteatomaimplicationsforthereconstructivesurgeon
AT breugemcc microtiaandcholesteatomaimplicationsforthereconstructivesurgeon