Cargando…

Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing liver imaging in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR5) for diagnosing HCC and LI-RADS category M (LR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Lingling, Hu, Yixin, Han, Jing, Li, Qing, Peng, Chuan, Zhou, Jianhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020323
_version_ 1783658567317848064
author Li, Lingling
Hu, Yixin
Han, Jing
Li, Qing
Peng, Chuan
Zhou, Jianhua
author_facet Li, Lingling
Hu, Yixin
Han, Jing
Li, Qing
Peng, Chuan
Zhou, Jianhua
author_sort Li, Lingling
collection PubMed
description The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing liver imaging in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR5) for diagnosing HCC and LI-RADS category M (LRM) for characterizing other non-HCC malignancies (OM) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multiple databases were searched for articles evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS and/or CT/MRI LI-RADS. A random-effects model was adopted to synthesize the summary estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of LR5 for diagnosing HCC and LRM for characterizing OM using CEUS and CT/MRI. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS LR5 for the diagnosis of HCC were 69% and 93%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity was 67% and the specificity, 93% of CT/MRI LR5 for HCC diagnosis. There was no significant difference between the overall diagnostic accuracy for HCC diagnosis of CEUS LR5 and that of CT/MRI LR5 in terms of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (p = 0.55). The sensitivity was 84% with a specificity of 90% in the CEUS LRM for characterizing OM, while the sensitivity and specificity of CT/MRI LRM for characterizing OM was 63% and 95%. The DOR of CEUS LRM for characterizing OM was higher than that of CT/MRI LRM without significant difference (50.59 vs. 36.06, p = 0.34). This meta-analysis indicated that CEUS LI-RADS is qualified to characterize HCC and OM and may provide complementary information on liver nodules to CT/MRI LI-RADS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7921912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79219122021-03-03 Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis Li, Lingling Hu, Yixin Han, Jing Li, Qing Peng, Chuan Zhou, Jianhua Diagnostics (Basel) Review The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing liver imaging in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category 5 (LR5) for diagnosing HCC and LI-RADS category M (LRM) for characterizing other non-HCC malignancies (OM) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Multiple databases were searched for articles evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS and/or CT/MRI LI-RADS. A random-effects model was adopted to synthesize the summary estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of LR5 for diagnosing HCC and LRM for characterizing OM using CEUS and CT/MRI. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS LR5 for the diagnosis of HCC were 69% and 93%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity was 67% and the specificity, 93% of CT/MRI LR5 for HCC diagnosis. There was no significant difference between the overall diagnostic accuracy for HCC diagnosis of CEUS LR5 and that of CT/MRI LR5 in terms of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (p = 0.55). The sensitivity was 84% with a specificity of 90% in the CEUS LRM for characterizing OM, while the sensitivity and specificity of CT/MRI LRM for characterizing OM was 63% and 95%. The DOR of CEUS LRM for characterizing OM was higher than that of CT/MRI LRM without significant difference (50.59 vs. 36.06, p = 0.34). This meta-analysis indicated that CEUS LI-RADS is qualified to characterize HCC and OM and may provide complementary information on liver nodules to CT/MRI LI-RADS. MDPI 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7921912/ /pubmed/33671158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020323 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Li, Lingling
Hu, Yixin
Han, Jing
Li, Qing
Peng, Chuan
Zhou, Jianhua
Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical application of liver imaging reporting and data system for characterizing liver neoplasms: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020323
work_keys_str_mv AT lilingling clinicalapplicationofliverimagingreportinganddatasystemforcharacterizingliverneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT huyixin clinicalapplicationofliverimagingreportinganddatasystemforcharacterizingliverneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT hanjing clinicalapplicationofliverimagingreportinganddatasystemforcharacterizingliverneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT liqing clinicalapplicationofliverimagingreportinganddatasystemforcharacterizingliverneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT pengchuan clinicalapplicationofliverimagingreportinganddatasystemforcharacterizingliverneoplasmsametaanalysis
AT zhoujianhua clinicalapplicationofliverimagingreportinganddatasystemforcharacterizingliverneoplasmsametaanalysis