Cargando…

Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although the SF(6) technique was developed over 25 years ago with the intention that it could be used to measure enteric methane production from ruminants outdoors, no experiments have reported the influence of ambient wind speed, temperature, humidity or rainfall on the accuracy of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moate, Peter J., Pryce, Jennie E., Marett, Leah C., Garner, Josie B., Deighton, Matthew H., Ribaux, Brigid E., Hannah, Murray C., Wales, William J., Williams, S. Richard O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020528
_version_ 1783658792505835520
author Moate, Peter J.
Pryce, Jennie E.
Marett, Leah C.
Garner, Josie B.
Deighton, Matthew H.
Ribaux, Brigid E.
Hannah, Murray C.
Wales, William J.
Williams, S. Richard O.
author_facet Moate, Peter J.
Pryce, Jennie E.
Marett, Leah C.
Garner, Josie B.
Deighton, Matthew H.
Ribaux, Brigid E.
Hannah, Murray C.
Wales, William J.
Williams, S. Richard O.
author_sort Moate, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although the SF(6) technique was developed over 25 years ago with the intention that it could be used to measure enteric methane production from ruminants outdoors, no experiments have reported the influence of ambient wind speed, temperature, humidity or rainfall on the accuracy of the technique. Six different cohorts of dairy cows (40 per cohort) were kept outdoors and fed a common diet during spring in 3 consecutive years. Individual cow feed intakes and daily methane productions were measured over 5 consecutive days and an automatic weather station measured air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and rainfall every 10 min. Regression analyses were used to relate the average daily temperature, wind speed, humidity and rainfall to the average daily dry matter intake, methane production and methane yield of each cohort of cows. It was concluded that the modified SF(6) technique can be used outdoors during a range of weather conditions without a significant effect on the measurement of methane production or methane yield of dairy cows. ABSTRACT: Despite the fact that the sulphur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer technique was developed over 25 years ago to measure methane production from grazing and non-housed animals, no studies have specifically investigated whether ambient wind speed, temperature, relative humidity and rainfall influence the accuracy of the method. The aim of this research was to investigate how these weather factors influence the measurement of enteric methane production by the SF(6) technique. Six different cohorts of dairy cows (40 per cohort) were kept outdoors and fed a common diet during spring in 3 consecutive years. Methane production from individual cows was measured daily over the last 5 days of each 32-day period. An automated weather station measured air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and rainfall every 10 min. Regression analyses were used to relate the average daily wind speed, average daily temperature, average daily relative humidity and total daily rainfall measurements to dry matter intake, average daily methane production and methane yield of each cohort of cows. It was concluded that the modified SF(6) technique can be used outdoors during a range of wind speeds, ambient temperatures, relative humidities and rainfall conditions without causing a significant effect on the measurement of methane production or methane yield of dairy cows.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7922900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79229002021-03-03 Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions Moate, Peter J. Pryce, Jennie E. Marett, Leah C. Garner, Josie B. Deighton, Matthew H. Ribaux, Brigid E. Hannah, Murray C. Wales, William J. Williams, S. Richard O. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Although the SF(6) technique was developed over 25 years ago with the intention that it could be used to measure enteric methane production from ruminants outdoors, no experiments have reported the influence of ambient wind speed, temperature, humidity or rainfall on the accuracy of the technique. Six different cohorts of dairy cows (40 per cohort) were kept outdoors and fed a common diet during spring in 3 consecutive years. Individual cow feed intakes and daily methane productions were measured over 5 consecutive days and an automatic weather station measured air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and rainfall every 10 min. Regression analyses were used to relate the average daily temperature, wind speed, humidity and rainfall to the average daily dry matter intake, methane production and methane yield of each cohort of cows. It was concluded that the modified SF(6) technique can be used outdoors during a range of weather conditions without a significant effect on the measurement of methane production or methane yield of dairy cows. ABSTRACT: Despite the fact that the sulphur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer technique was developed over 25 years ago to measure methane production from grazing and non-housed animals, no studies have specifically investigated whether ambient wind speed, temperature, relative humidity and rainfall influence the accuracy of the method. The aim of this research was to investigate how these weather factors influence the measurement of enteric methane production by the SF(6) technique. Six different cohorts of dairy cows (40 per cohort) were kept outdoors and fed a common diet during spring in 3 consecutive years. Methane production from individual cows was measured daily over the last 5 days of each 32-day period. An automated weather station measured air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and rainfall every 10 min. Regression analyses were used to relate the average daily wind speed, average daily temperature, average daily relative humidity and total daily rainfall measurements to dry matter intake, average daily methane production and methane yield of each cohort of cows. It was concluded that the modified SF(6) technique can be used outdoors during a range of wind speeds, ambient temperatures, relative humidities and rainfall conditions without causing a significant effect on the measurement of methane production or methane yield of dairy cows. MDPI 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7922900/ /pubmed/33670674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020528 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moate, Peter J.
Pryce, Jennie E.
Marett, Leah C.
Garner, Josie B.
Deighton, Matthew H.
Ribaux, Brigid E.
Hannah, Murray C.
Wales, William J.
Williams, S. Richard O.
Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions
title Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions
title_full Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions
title_fullStr Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions
title_short Measurement of Enteric Methane Emissions by the SF(6) Technique Is Not Affected by Ambient Weather Conditions
title_sort measurement of enteric methane emissions by the sf(6) technique is not affected by ambient weather conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33670674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11020528
work_keys_str_mv AT moatepeterj measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT prycejenniee measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT marettleahc measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT garnerjosieb measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT deightonmatthewh measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT ribauxbrigide measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT hannahmurrayc measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT waleswilliamj measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions
AT williamssrichardo measurementofentericmethaneemissionsbythesf6techniqueisnotaffectedbyambientweatherconditions