Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design
The objective of this paper is to compare conventional, ultrasound, microwave, and French press methods for the extraction of antioxidant compounds from Decatropis bicolor in an aqueous medium. This plant is widely used in Mexican traditional medicine for breast cancer treatment. Despite that, there...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041042 |
_version_ | 1783658814659100672 |
---|---|
author | Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith Contreras-López, Elizabeth Hernández-Sánchez, Tania González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo Añorve-Morga, Javier Ramírez-Godínez, Juan |
author_facet | Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith Contreras-López, Elizabeth Hernández-Sánchez, Tania González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo Añorve-Morga, Javier Ramírez-Godínez, Juan |
author_sort | Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this paper is to compare conventional, ultrasound, microwave, and French press methods for the extraction of antioxidant compounds from Decatropis bicolor in an aqueous medium. This plant is widely used in Mexican traditional medicine for breast cancer treatment. Despite that, there are few studies on D. bicolor. Two response surface designs were applied to establish the best conditions of the liberation of antioxidants from D. bicolor, which were determined by DPPH• and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) techniques. The total phenolic content was evaluated by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The results showed that D. bicolor is a source of antioxidants (669–2128 mg ET/100 g and 553–1920 mg EFe(2+)/100 g, respectively) and phenolic compounds (2232–9929 mg EGA/100 g). Among the physical factors that were analyzed, the temperature was the determinant factor to liberate the compounds of interest by using low concentrations of the sample and short times of extraction. The French press was the most efficient method, obtaining values of antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds even higher than those reported by using extraction methods with solvents such as methanol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7922995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-79229952021-03-03 Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith Contreras-López, Elizabeth Hernández-Sánchez, Tania González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo Añorve-Morga, Javier Ramírez-Godínez, Juan Molecules Article The objective of this paper is to compare conventional, ultrasound, microwave, and French press methods for the extraction of antioxidant compounds from Decatropis bicolor in an aqueous medium. This plant is widely used in Mexican traditional medicine for breast cancer treatment. Despite that, there are few studies on D. bicolor. Two response surface designs were applied to establish the best conditions of the liberation of antioxidants from D. bicolor, which were determined by DPPH• and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) techniques. The total phenolic content was evaluated by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The results showed that D. bicolor is a source of antioxidants (669–2128 mg ET/100 g and 553–1920 mg EFe(2+)/100 g, respectively) and phenolic compounds (2232–9929 mg EGA/100 g). Among the physical factors that were analyzed, the temperature was the determinant factor to liberate the compounds of interest by using low concentrations of the sample and short times of extraction. The French press was the most efficient method, obtaining values of antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds even higher than those reported by using extraction methods with solvents such as methanol. MDPI 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7922995/ /pubmed/33671156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041042 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith Contreras-López, Elizabeth Hernández-Sánchez, Tania González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo Añorve-Morga, Javier Ramírez-Godínez, Juan Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of four extraction methods of antioxidant compounds from decatropis bicolor in aqueous medium applying response surface design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaimezordazjudith comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign AT contreraslopezelizabeth comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign AT hernandezsancheztania comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign AT gonzalezolivaresluisguillermo comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign AT anorvemorgajavier comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign AT ramirezgodinezjuan comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign |