Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design

The objective of this paper is to compare conventional, ultrasound, microwave, and French press methods for the extraction of antioxidant compounds from Decatropis bicolor in an aqueous medium. This plant is widely used in Mexican traditional medicine for breast cancer treatment. Despite that, there...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith, Contreras-López, Elizabeth, Hernández-Sánchez, Tania, González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo, Añorve-Morga, Javier, Ramírez-Godínez, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041042
_version_ 1783658814659100672
author Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith
Contreras-López, Elizabeth
Hernández-Sánchez, Tania
González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo
Añorve-Morga, Javier
Ramírez-Godínez, Juan
author_facet Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith
Contreras-López, Elizabeth
Hernández-Sánchez, Tania
González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo
Añorve-Morga, Javier
Ramírez-Godínez, Juan
author_sort Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith
collection PubMed
description The objective of this paper is to compare conventional, ultrasound, microwave, and French press methods for the extraction of antioxidant compounds from Decatropis bicolor in an aqueous medium. This plant is widely used in Mexican traditional medicine for breast cancer treatment. Despite that, there are few studies on D. bicolor. Two response surface designs were applied to establish the best conditions of the liberation of antioxidants from D. bicolor, which were determined by DPPH• and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) techniques. The total phenolic content was evaluated by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The results showed that D. bicolor is a source of antioxidants (669–2128 mg ET/100 g and 553–1920 mg EFe(2+)/100 g, respectively) and phenolic compounds (2232–9929 mg EGA/100 g). Among the physical factors that were analyzed, the temperature was the determinant factor to liberate the compounds of interest by using low concentrations of the sample and short times of extraction. The French press was the most efficient method, obtaining values of antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds even higher than those reported by using extraction methods with solvents such as methanol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7922995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79229952021-03-03 Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith Contreras-López, Elizabeth Hernández-Sánchez, Tania González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo Añorve-Morga, Javier Ramírez-Godínez, Juan Molecules Article The objective of this paper is to compare conventional, ultrasound, microwave, and French press methods for the extraction of antioxidant compounds from Decatropis bicolor in an aqueous medium. This plant is widely used in Mexican traditional medicine for breast cancer treatment. Despite that, there are few studies on D. bicolor. Two response surface designs were applied to establish the best conditions of the liberation of antioxidants from D. bicolor, which were determined by DPPH• and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) techniques. The total phenolic content was evaluated by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The results showed that D. bicolor is a source of antioxidants (669–2128 mg ET/100 g and 553–1920 mg EFe(2+)/100 g, respectively) and phenolic compounds (2232–9929 mg EGA/100 g). Among the physical factors that were analyzed, the temperature was the determinant factor to liberate the compounds of interest by using low concentrations of the sample and short times of extraction. The French press was the most efficient method, obtaining values of antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds even higher than those reported by using extraction methods with solvents such as methanol. MDPI 2021-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7922995/ /pubmed/33671156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041042 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jaimez-Ordaz, Judith
Contreras-López, Elizabeth
Hernández-Sánchez, Tania
González-Olivares, Luis Guillermo
Añorve-Morga, Javier
Ramírez-Godínez, Juan
Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design
title Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Four Extraction Methods of Antioxidant Compounds from Decatropis bicolor in Aqueous Medium Applying Response Surface Design
title_sort comparative evaluation of four extraction methods of antioxidant compounds from decatropis bicolor in aqueous medium applying response surface design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33671156
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041042
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimezordazjudith comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign
AT contreraslopezelizabeth comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign
AT hernandezsancheztania comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign
AT gonzalezolivaresluisguillermo comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign
AT anorvemorgajavier comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign
AT ramirezgodinezjuan comparativeevaluationoffourextractionmethodsofantioxidantcompoundsfromdecatropisbicolorinaqueousmediumapplyingresponsesurfacedesign