Cargando…

Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET

The recent introduction of solid-state detectors in clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners has significantly improved image quality and spatial resolution and shortened acquisition time compared to conventional analog PET scanners. In an initial evaluation of the performance of our new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loft, Mathias, Johnbeck, Camilla B., Carlsen, Esben A., Johannesen, Helle H., Oturai, Peter, Langer, Seppo W., Knigge, Ulrich, Kjaer, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7923227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020350
_version_ 1783658865986895872
author Loft, Mathias
Johnbeck, Camilla B.
Carlsen, Esben A.
Johannesen, Helle H.
Oturai, Peter
Langer, Seppo W.
Knigge, Ulrich
Kjaer, Andreas
author_facet Loft, Mathias
Johnbeck, Camilla B.
Carlsen, Esben A.
Johannesen, Helle H.
Oturai, Peter
Langer, Seppo W.
Knigge, Ulrich
Kjaer, Andreas
author_sort Loft, Mathias
collection PubMed
description The recent introduction of solid-state detectors in clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners has significantly improved image quality and spatial resolution and shortened acquisition time compared to conventional analog PET scanners. In an initial evaluation of the performance of our newly acquired Siemens Biograph Vision 600 PET/CT (digital PET/CT) scanner for (64)Cu-DOTATATE imaging, we compared PET/CT acquisitions from patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) grades 1 and 2 and stable disease on CT who were scanned on both our Siemens Biograph 128 mCT PET/CT (analog PET/CT) and digital PET/CT within 6 months as part of their routine clinical management. Five patients fulfilled the criteria and were included in the analysis. The digital PET acquisition time was less than 1/3 of the analog PET acquisition time (digital PET, mean (min:s): 08:20 (range, 07:59–09:45); analog PET, 25:28 (24:39–28:44), p < 0.001). All 44 lesions detected on the analog PET with corresponding structural correlates on the CT were also found on the digital PET performed 137 (107–176) days later. Our initial findings suggest that digital (64)Cu-DOTATATE PET can successfully be performed in patients with NENs using an image acquisition time of only 1/3 of what is used for an analog (64)Cu-DOTATATE PET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7923227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-79232272021-03-03 Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET Loft, Mathias Johnbeck, Camilla B. Carlsen, Esben A. Johannesen, Helle H. Oturai, Peter Langer, Seppo W. Knigge, Ulrich Kjaer, Andreas Diagnostics (Basel) Article The recent introduction of solid-state detectors in clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners has significantly improved image quality and spatial resolution and shortened acquisition time compared to conventional analog PET scanners. In an initial evaluation of the performance of our newly acquired Siemens Biograph Vision 600 PET/CT (digital PET/CT) scanner for (64)Cu-DOTATATE imaging, we compared PET/CT acquisitions from patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) grades 1 and 2 and stable disease on CT who were scanned on both our Siemens Biograph 128 mCT PET/CT (analog PET/CT) and digital PET/CT within 6 months as part of their routine clinical management. Five patients fulfilled the criteria and were included in the analysis. The digital PET acquisition time was less than 1/3 of the analog PET acquisition time (digital PET, mean (min:s): 08:20 (range, 07:59–09:45); analog PET, 25:28 (24:39–28:44), p < 0.001). All 44 lesions detected on the analog PET with corresponding structural correlates on the CT were also found on the digital PET performed 137 (107–176) days later. Our initial findings suggest that digital (64)Cu-DOTATATE PET can successfully be performed in patients with NENs using an image acquisition time of only 1/3 of what is used for an analog (64)Cu-DOTATATE PET. MDPI 2021-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7923227/ /pubmed/33669838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020350 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Loft, Mathias
Johnbeck, Camilla B.
Carlsen, Esben A.
Johannesen, Helle H.
Oturai, Peter
Langer, Seppo W.
Knigge, Ulrich
Kjaer, Andreas
Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET
title Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET
title_full Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET
title_fullStr Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET
title_full_unstemmed Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET
title_short Initial Experience with (64)Cu-DOTATATE Digital PET of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Comparison with Analog PET
title_sort initial experience with (64)cu-dotatate digital pet of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: comparison with analog pet
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7923227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33669838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020350
work_keys_str_mv AT loftmathias initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet
AT johnbeckcamillab initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet
AT carlsenesbena initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet
AT johannesenhelleh initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet
AT oturaipeter initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet
AT langerseppow initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet
AT kniggeulrich initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet
AT kjaerandreas initialexperiencewith64cudotatatedigitalpetofpatientswithneuroendocrineneoplasmscomparisonwithanalogpet